Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Are referred to the Court of Justice of

📅 Décision du 15 November 2018⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Are referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union the following questions for a preliminary ruling: Does Directive 2006/123/EC of 12 December 2006 apply to the letting for valuable consideration, even on a non-professional basis, repeatedly and for short periods, of furnished premises for residential use which do not constitute the lessor's main residence, to a transient clientele who do not take up residence there? Does legislation such as that provided for by Article L. 631-7 of the Construction and Housing Code constitute an authorisation scheme within the meaning of Articles 9 to 13 of that directive? If so: - must Article 9(b) of that directive be interpreted as meaning that the objective of combating the shortage of housing for rent constitutes an overriding reason in the public interest capable of justifying a national measure which, in certain geographical areas, makes the letting of furnished premises intended for residential use repeatedly for short periods to a transient clientele who do not take up residence there subject to authorisation and, if so, is such a measure proportionate to the objective pursued? - does Article 10(2) preclude a national measure which makes the letting of furnished premises intended for residential use 'repeatedly', for 'short periods', to a 'transient clientele who do not take up residence there' subject to authorisation and which provides that the conditions for granting authorisation are to be determined by a resolution of the municipal council, in the light of social mix objectives, in particular depending on the characteristics of the local housing markets and the need not to aggravate the housing shortage?

Reference decision: cc • N° 17-26.156 • 2018-11-15 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your real estate law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Are referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union the following questions for a preliminary ruling: Does Directive 2006/123/EC of 12 December 2006 apply to the letting for valuable consideration, even on a non-professional basis, repeatedly and for short periods, of furnished premises for residential use which do not constitute the lessor's main residence, to a transient clientele who do not take up residence there? Does legislation such as that provided for by Article L. 631-7 of the Construction and Housing Code constitute an authorisation scheme within the meaning of Articles 9 to 13 of that directive? If so: - must Article 9(b) of that directive be interpreted as meaning that the objective of combating the shortage of housing for rent constitutes an overriding reason in the public interest capable of justifying a national measure which, in certain geographical areas, makes the letting of furnished premises intended for residential use repeatedly for short periods to a transient clientele who do not take up residence there subject to authorisation and, if so, is such a measure proportionate to the objective pursued? - does Article 10(2) preclude a national measure which makes the letting of furnished premises intended for residential use 'repeatedly', for 'short periods', to a 'transient clientele who do not take up residence there' subject to authorisation and which provides that the conditions for granting authorisation are to be determined by a resolution of the municipal council, in the light of social mix objectives, in particular depending on the characteristics of the local housing markets and the need not to aggravate the housing shortage?

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (titles, deeds, letters)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 17-26.156
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 15 novembre 2018

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide