Commercial Lease and Registration: Assumption of Obligations Preserves Eviction Compensation

Picture the scene: you own a commercial premises in Cagnes-sur-Mer, leased to a small company that has just bought the business. You give it notice to quit for 30 September 2022, refusing to renew the lease. But then it claims an eviction indemnity (compensation payable to an evicted tenant for the loss suffered) of €80,000, arguing that it has been trading for years. Problem: on the date you served the notice, the company was not yet registered in the Trade and Companies Register (RCS). So you think this notice is valid and the indemnity is not payable? Not so fast. The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 7 December 2011, ruled: if the company has assumed the obligations undertaken on its behalf before registration, it is deemed to have existed from the date of those obligations. And therefore, the notice given between the transfer of the business and registration may give rise to a right to compensation. A decision that made many landlords tremble, and which deserves closer examination.

The Facts: A Common Story

Ms X, owner of commercial premises in Bordeaux, had leased her premises to Mr Y for the operation of a business. In 2006, Mr Y transfers his business to a company in formation (not yet registered). On 31 March 2007, Ms X gives notice (an act by which the landlord notifies the tenant that the lease will not be renewed) to this company, refusing renewal without compensation. For her, no question of paying eviction compensation because the company was not registered at the time of the notice, so it did not have legal personality (capacity to hold rights and obligations). The company, on the other hand, argues that the notice is void and claims the indemnity. The Bordeaux Court of Appeal, on 14 September 2010, rules in favour of the owner: according to it, at the date of the notice, the company did not legally exist, so the notice is valid and no compensation. Except that the company, after the notice, had been registered and had assumed all the obligations undertaken on its behalf before registration, notably the lease and the business. The Court of Cassation quashes the judgment: due to this assumption, the company is deemed to have had legal personality from the date of the transfer, therefore at the date of the notice. Result: the notice was given to an existing company, and eviction compensation may be due. A case that shows that formalism should not prevail over economic reality.

The Court's Reasoning — Dissected

The Court of Cassation relies on Article L. 210-6 of the Commercial Code. This provision states that commercial companies enjoy legal personality from their registration, but if they assume obligations incurred on their behalf before that registration, they are deemed to have been the holders of those rights and obligations from the date of those obligations. In everyday language: a company that is not yet officially created can act through its founders, and if it 'ratifies' those acts after registration, it is as if it had acted from the outset. Here, the company had assumed the lease and the business before being registered. However, the notice was given after this assumption but before registration. For the Court, the subsequent assumption of obligations retroactively makes the legal personality effective from the date of the transfer. Therefore, the notice was given to a legally existing company, and the landlord cannot rely on the lack of registration to refuse compensation. Warning: this is not a reversal, but a classic application of the provision. However, it reminds lower courts that they must verify whether the assumption of obligations actually took place. If the company had not assumed the obligations, the notice would have been valid. In practice, this forces landlords to check not only the date of registration but also the date of assumption of obligations.

What This Means for You — Concretely

For the landlord: if you give notice to a company in formation, you cannot hide behind the lack of registration if the company has assumed the obligations. You risk having to pay eviction compensation (often several years' rent, e.g. €50,000 to €100,000 for an average premises in Villefranche-sur-Mer). Before giving notice, demand a Kbis extract (registration certificate) or, failing that, check whether the company has assumed the obligations. For the tenant: if you are in formation and receive a notice, do not panic. Ensure that you expressly assume the obligations (by a clause in the articles of association or a decision of the shareholders) after registration. You will then be able to claim the compensation. For the buyer of a business: upon the transfer, verify that the company assumes the prior obligations. This will protect you in case of a dispute. Concrete example: in Cagnes-sur-Mer, a buyer purchased a bakery business on 1 March 2022, registration on 15 April 2022, landlord's notice on 10 May 2022. If the articles of association assume the obligations, the notice was given to a company existing from 1 March, so compensation is due. Otherwise, no compensation. Beware of time limits: the notice must be given at least 6 months before the lease expiry date (Article L. 145-9 of the Commercial Code).

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Check the Kbis extract before any notice: always ask for a Kbis extract less than 3 months old. If the company is not registered, demand a certificate of assumption of obligations.
• Include assumption clauses in the articles of association: if you create a company, expressly provide that it assumes all obligations incurred before registration (lease, loans, etc.).
• Prepare a formal resolution of assumption: after registration, have the shareholders vote on a resolution assuming the obligations. Keep it safe.
• Consult a lawyer before giving notice: a lawyer specialising in property law can analyse the situation and prevent an unjustified refusal of compensation. The cost of a consultation (around €150-200) is trivial compared to a judgment for €80,000.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

The Court of Cassation has already applied this principle in other contexts. For example, in a judgment of 20 March 2007 (No. 05-21.508), it held that the assumption of obligations by a company after registration results in the retroactivity of legal personality for prior acts. Similarly, in a judgment of 9 July 2008 (No. 07-18.956), it specified that this retroactivity applies to all acts, including leases. The trend is therefore consistent: the courts favour economic reality over formalism. This means that landlords must be particularly vigilant when a business is transferred to a company in formation. In the future, one can expect courts to require clear proof of the assumption (written, unequivocal). If the assumption is not formalised, the notice would be valid. In summary, legal certainty requires written documents.

Checklist Before Acting

FAQ:

• Can I give notice to an unregistered company? Yes, but if it later assumes the obligations, the notice will be considered as given to an existing company, and you may have to pay eviction compensation.
• What is the deadline for assuming obligations? There is no legal deadline, but it is prudent to do so upon registration. In practice, the assumption must be express.
• What if I have already given notice without checking registration? Consult a lawyer. If the company is registered and has assumed the obligations, you risk having to pay compensation. Possibly negotiate a settlement.
• How to prove the assumption of obligations? By the company's articles of association, a shareholders' decision, or a notarial deed. Keep a copy.
• Should the notice be served on the company or its founders? On the company in formation, at the premises address. If it is registered later, the notice remains valid if obligations are assumed.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) may save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →