Aller au contenu principal
Additional Paid Leave: How to Calculate Their Remuneration According to the Cour de cassation
Droit-immobilier

Additional Paid Leave: How to Calculate Their Remuneration According to the Cour de cassation

📅 Decision of 26 February 1997🔄 Updated on 18 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 8 views📖 6 min read

The Cour de cassation has reaffirmed that additional paid leave provided for by a collective agreement must be remunerated according to the rule most favourable to the employee. This decision impacts employers and employees in the real estate sector and beyond.

Reference decision: cc • No. 93-46.579 • 1997-02-26 • Consult the decision →

Imagine you are the owner of a real estate agency in Saint-Vincent-de-Tyrosse. You have negotiated additional leave with your employees through the collective agreement, thinking you were doing the right thing. But then one day, one of them claims a different remuneration for these rest days. Who is right? How to calculate these conventional leave days?

This situation, although drawn from employment law, indirectly affects all real estate professionals who employ staff. Because behind the walls of agencies, law firms or development companies, remuneration issues are at play that can generate costly disputes.

The Cour de cassation, in a 1997 ruling that remains relevant today, provides a clear answer: the protective rules of the French Labour Code also apply to additional leave. But what exactly does this change for you, as a property owner, tenant or professional in the sector?

The facts: a story as it happens every day

In this case, we are in 1993. Mr. Dupont, an employee of a company in the transport sector, benefits from a collective agreement that grants him six additional days of paid annual leave. These days are added to the statutory leave and are spread over three quarters outside the main holiday period.

The employer, a company based in an industrial region similar to that of Tarnos with its business zones, applies an internal practice to remunerate this additional leave: it pays salary maintenance, i.e., the normal salary, without applying the one-tenth rule provided for by the French Labour Code for paid leave.

Mr. Dupont challenges this practice. He believes that the one-tenth rule (which consists of calculating the paid leave allowance by taking 10% of the total remuneration lost during the reference period) is more favourable and must apply. The employer resists, arguing that since this leave is conventional, it can apply its own rules.

The dispute goes up to the industrial tribunal (specialised jurisdiction in employment law), then to the Court of Appeal. At each stage, positions clash. Finally, the Cour de cassation is seized. The judicial process will have lasted nearly four years, a typical timeframe for this type of litigation.

The court's reasoning — dissected

The judges of the Cour de cassation analysed the case with impeccable logic. They relied on Article L. 223-11 of the French Labour Code (which determines the method of calculating the paid leave allowance). This article provides for two methods: salary maintenance or the one-tenth rule, retaining the one most favourable to the employee.

The crucial point? The court qualified these provisions as being of public policy. In other words, they are binding on everyone and cannot be overridden by less favourable agreements. What few people know is that this notion of public policy protects the employee against provisions that would disadvantage them.

The court then extended this principle to additional leave of conventional origin. In short, even if this leave is not provided for by law but by a collective agreement, its remuneration must respect the protective rules of the French Labour Code. The employer cannot invoke an internal practice to impose less advantageous conditions.

In this case, the one-tenth rule proved more favourable. The court therefore confirmed that Mr. Dupont could claim the benefit of this calculation method. This decision represents a confirmation of the protective case law for employees, but it has the merit of clarifying a grey area: the application of legal rules to conventional benefits.

What this changes for you — concretely

If you are a landlord employing staff to manage your properties in Tarnos, this decision directly concerns you. You must check how you remunerate your employees' additional leave. For example, for an employee earning €2,000 gross monthly with additional leave, the calculation can vary by several hundred euros.

For a tenant, the impact is indirect but real: if your landlord employs a caretaker or maintenance agent, disputes over leave could affect the management of your building. undefined, I have come across cases where employment disputes delayed essential works in co-ownership.

Real estate professionals (agents, developers, surveyors) must pay particular attention to their collective agreements. How to react? First, conduct an audit of your practices for remunerating leave. Secondly, anticipate potential regularisations that could go back three years (limitation period for salary matters).

Be careful, however: this decision does not create new rights, but it reminds us of the strict application of existing rules. If you are in this situation, you must systematically compare the two calculation methods and retain the one most favourable to the employee.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Check your collective agreement: Precisely identify the additional leave provided for and their indicated remuneration method. Do not rely on internal practices.
  • Systematically calculate both methods: For each employee, compare salary maintenance and the one-tenth rule. Document this calculation to prove your good faith in case of an inspection.
  • Train your HR staff: Ensure that the people in charge of payroll know this legal obligation. A repeated calculation error over several years can generate significant arrears.
  • Consult a specialised lawyer: Before changing your practices or responding to a claim, have your situation checked by a professional. A preventive consultation costs less than a lawsuit.

This 1997 decision fits into a consistent line of case law. Already in 1985, the Cour de cassation had affirmed the public policy nature of the rules on paid leave (ruling No. 83-40.187). It has since regularly recalled this principle, notably in a 2015 ruling concerning the construction sector.

The trend of the courts is clear: maximum protection of the employee, with an extensive interpretation of favourable rules. Judges consider that conventional benefits must not be used to circumvent legal guarantees.

For the future, this case law remains solid. Reforms of employment law have not called these fundamental principles into question. However, the increasing complexity of collective agreements and the multiplication of special statuses make the verification of calculations more and more technical.

In practice: what to do

FAQ: Frequently asked questions

1. How to know if the one-tenth rule is more favourable?
Calculate: 1) Salary maintenance = normal salary during leave. 2) One-tenth rule = 10% of the total remuneration lost during the reference period. Compare the two amounts.

2. Does this rule apply to self-employed individuals?
No, only to employees bound by an employment contract. Self-employed real estate agents are not concerned.

3. What risks does an employer face if they do not comply with this rule?
Salary arrears for up to 3 years, late payment interest, and potentially damages for moral prejudice.

4. Can the collective agreement be modified to circumvent this rule?
No, any less favourable clause would be void as contrary to public policy.

5. How to check retroactively?
Keep the payslips for the last 3 years and recalculate with an accountant or lawyer.

Do you find yourself in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

Legal information

  • Number: 93-46.579
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 26 February 1997

Keywords

droit du travailcongés payésconvention collectiverémunérationlitige employeur

Practical use cases

1

Real estate agency owner in Lyon facing leave pay dispute

A real estate agency owner in Lyon (Lyon) negotiated a collective agreement granting employees 5 additional paid leave days annually. When an employee claimed these days should be paid using the one-tenth rule from the French Labour Code, the owner argued conventional leave could follow company rules. The dispute involves approximately €2,500 in potential back pay over two years.

Practical application:

This case law confirms that protective rules of the French Labour Code, including the one-tenth rule for calculating paid leave allowance, apply to additional conventional leave. As an employer, you must calculate remuneration for these days by taking 10% of total remuneration lost during the reference period, not just salary maintenance. Immediately review your payroll practices for all employees with conventional leave to ensure compliance and avoid costly litigation. Consult a labour law specialist to adjust calculations and potentially settle any outstanding claims.

2

Property management company in Nice with staff leave issues

A property management company in Nice (Nice) employs 15 staff members under a collective agreement providing 4 extra leave days per year. The company has been paying these days at normal salary rates, but an employee recently filed a complaint seeking application of the one-tenth rule, affecting leave taken over the past 18 months in amounts around €1,800 per employee.

Practical application:

The Cour de cassation ruling mandates that the one-tenth rule applies to all paid leave, including conventional additional days, as it is generally more favourable to employees. You must recalculate leave payments using 10% of total remuneration lost during the reference period, not just base salary. Audit past leave payments to identify discrepancies and prepare for potential adjustments or negotiations. Implement updated payroll procedures to prevent future disputes and consider training HR staff on these legal requirements.

3

Real estate developer in Bordeaux handling employee leave claims

A real estate developer in Bordeaux (Bordeaux) has a collective agreement with 8 additional leave days for project managers. After a manager demanded recalculation using the one-tenth rule for leave taken in 2023, the developer faces potential back pay of about €3,000 per affected employee, totaling €24,000 across the team.

Practical application:

This case law establishes that employers cannot bypass the French Labour Code's protective rules for conventional leave; the one-tenth rule must be applied if it benefits employees. Calculate the leave allowance by taking 10% of total remuneration (including bonuses and commissions) lost during the reference period. Proactively address the claim by consulting legal counsel to assess liability and negotiate a settlement if needed. Update employment contracts and internal policies to clearly outline leave remuneration methods to ensure ongoing compliance.

Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide