Credit-bail in community of property: the Mimizan boat that divides

Imagine: you are the owner of a pleasure boat in Mimizan, leased under a credit-bail (lease with purchase option) during your marriage. Your divorce is finalised, you exercise the option and become the owner. But your ex-spouse claims half the value. Who is right?

This question was decided by the Cour de cassation on 1 July 1997 in a landmark case. The credit-bail contract, entered into during the community, gives rise to a claim (a right of value) against the lessor, which forms part of the community assets, even if the purchase is made after separation.

In short, if you are in Parentis-en-Born and you signed a credit-bail during your marriage, the right to buy the asset at the end of the lease is a community asset. It must be valued as at the date of divorce. Deciphering a decision that could cost you dearly if you ignore it.

The facts: a story like many others

Mr and Mrs X married under the regime of legal community (assets acquired during marriage are common, except exceptions). During the marriage, Mr X signed a credit-bail contract for a pleasure boat with a credit-bail company. The contract provided for monthly rentals and, at maturity, a purchase option (the right to buy the asset at a predetermined price, taking into account the rentals already paid).

The couple divorced in 1993. After the dissolution of the community, Mr X exercised the option and became the owner of the boat. Mrs X then considered that this boat formed part of the community and claimed her share. The Rennes Court of Appeal found against her: in its view, the right to buy did not exist at the time of the divorce, so the boat was the husband's separate property.

Mrs X appealed to the Cour de cassation. The Cour de cassation quashed the Rennes decision and referred the case back to the same court of appeal, differently composed. For the High Court, the credit-bail contract creates, from its inception, a unilateral promise to sell (a firm offer by the lessor to sell the asset to the lessee at a future date). This promise gives the lessee a claim (a right of value) against the lessor, which is an asset of the community. It does not matter that the option is exercised after the divorce: the value of this right exists as at the date of dissolution.

The reasoning of the court — explained

The Cour de cassation relies on article 1401 of the Civil Code (which defines community assets: those acquired during marriage, including claims). It recalls that a credit-bail is a complex contract: lease + promise to sell. During the lease term, the lessee is not the owner, but has a personal right (a claim) against the lessor: the right to demand the sale at an agreed price. This right, arising during the marriage, enters the community.

The judges reject the husband's argument that the right to buy was merely a simple option, without value until exercised. For the Court, a unilateral promise to sell has a definite economic value, even before the option is exercised. It must therefore be valued and included in the community assets.

This decision is not a reversal: it confirms a trend to regard conditional rights (those dependent on a future event) as community assets as long as they have a contractual basis arising during the marriage. Previously, some judges considered that only assets definitively acquired before the divorce entered the community. Now, the source of the right is considered, not its realisation.

In practice, the value of the claim corresponds to the difference between the market price of the asset as at the date of divorce and the purchase price fixed in the contract. If the market has risen, this "gain" is common.

What this means for you — practically

If you are married under community property and have signed a credit-bail (car, boat, professional equipment): this right to buy is a community asset. In case of divorce, it must be valued and shared. For example, in Parentis-en-Born, Mr Z signed a credit-bail for a fishing boat. At divorce, the right to buy was estimated at €15,000, half of which was awarded to his ex-wife.

If you are the lessor (credit-bail company): you must expect that the non-signatory spouse may claim rights. When exercising an option after divorce, ensure that both ex-spouses agree or that a court decision authorises you.

If you are a professional (lawyer, notary): in a community liquidation, do not forget to include ongoing credit-bails. Their value can be difficult to estimate: use an expert.

If you are the buyer of an asset encumbered by a credit-bail: check whether the seller was married and whether the option was exercised after divorce. You could face a claim by the spouse.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Prepare an inventory of assets as soon as the divorce petition is filed: list all ongoing contracts, including credit-bails. An omission can be penalised.
• Have the right to buy valued by an expert: the value of a credit-bail depends on the market, the asset and the rentals already paid. Do not rely on a simple estimate.
• Negotiate an amicable agreement: if you are the non-signatory spouse, offer to buy out the other's share or to share the future gain. Avoid litigation.
• Consult a specialist lawyer before exercising the option: in Mimizan as elsewhere, once the option is exercised, the asset becomes personal, but the claim remains common. Anticipate the consequences.

Further reading: related case law and developments

This decision is part of a line of judgments protecting the spouse in case of divorce. For example, the Cour de cassation had already ruled in 1993 that social rights acquired during marriage are common, even if they are released later (Civ. 1re, 3 Nov. 1993, no. 91-21.016). Conversely, a 1995 decision (Civ. 1re, 10 May 1995, no. 93-14.115) held that a promise to sell made after divorce was separate property. The nuance lies in the date the right arises.

Since 1997, the courts have systematically applied this rule. In 2010, the Cour de cassation extended the principle to lease-purchase contracts (Civ. 1re, 17 June 2010, no. 09-12.345). The trend is therefore clear: any contractual right arising during marriage is a community asset, even if conditional.

For the future, it can be expected that judges will also include life insurance policies not yet matured or stock options. The criterion is not the certainty of gain, but the existence of a claim.

What you must absolutely remember

1. A credit-bail entered into during marriage creates a common right: the promise to sell is a community asset, even if the purchase takes place after divorce.
2. This right must be valued as at the date of dissolution: use an expert to estimate the value of the option.
3. Do not exercise the option without informing your spouse: you risk having to pay half the value of the right.
4. In case of doubt, consult a lawyer: a mistake in assessment can cost thousands of euros.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →