Aller au contenu principal
Division of Condominium Lots: When the Law Does Not Apply (Cass. 3e civ., 3 June 2021, No. 20-16.777)
Droit-immobilier

Division of Condominium Lots: When the Law Does Not Apply (Cass. 3e civ., 3 June 2021, No. 20-16.777)

📅 Decision of 03 June 2021🔄 Updated on 12 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 18 views📖 2 min read

The Court of Cassation clarifies that Article L. 111-6-1 of the Construction and Housing Code, which imposes strict conditions for dividing residential premises, does not apply to the division of condominium lots carried out to legally and accountingly individualise lots corresponding to the existing structure of the building. This decision clarifies a crucial point for co-owners and managing agents.

Reference Decision: Cass. 3e civ. • No. 20-16.777 • 2021-06-03 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are the owner of a flat in Vallauris, in a building from the 1970s. The general meeting votes to divide certain condominium lots to regularise the cadastral situation. But a co-owner challenges this, arguing that the division is subject to a strict law intended to prevent substandard housing. Who is right? Until this decision of the Court of Cassation of 3 June 2021, the answer was unclear. Now the judges have ruled: Article L. 111-6-1 of the Construction and Housing Code, which governs the division of residential premises, does not apply to the division of condominium lots carried out for legal and accounting reasons, without the creation of new dwellings.

This decision, handed down by the Third Civil Chamber, is a victory for the legal certainty of condominiums. It clarifies that the law on the division of dwellings only targets operations that result in the making available of new residential premises. On the other hand, when a lot is divided to make two lots corresponding to parts already distinct in the building (for example, a 'cellar' lot and a 'flat' lot which were artificially combined), it does not fall within the scope of this regulation. Detailed explanation below.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Legal information

  • Number: 20-16.777
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 03 June 2021

Keywords

division de lotscopropriététantièmesarticle L111-6-1Cour de cassation2021droit immobilier

Practical use cases

1

Co-owner wishing to divide his lot to sell it separately

Mr Dupont, owner in Vallauris, owns a lot that includes a studio and a cellar. He wants to divide this lot to sell the cellar independently. The general meeting votes on the division. Another co-owner challenges it, invoking Article L. 111-6-1.

Practical application:

Thanks to this decision, Mr Dupont can prove that the division is purely legal: the studio and the cellar are already physically distinct. The law does not apply. He must have the division recorded in the condominium regulations and modify the shares.

2

Managing agent regularising poorly described lots

The managing agent of a residence in Sophia-Antipolis notes that the condominium regulations describe a lot 'flat with cellar' whereas the cellar is actually a separate lot. He proposes a division to reflect reality.

Practical application:

The division is legal without going through Article L. 111-6-1. The managing agent must convene a general meeting, explain the modification of the shares, and have the vote passed with the required majority. Opposing co-owners cannot invoke this law to block it.

3

Purchaser of a divided lot without apparent compliance with the law

Mrs Martin buys a flat in Grasse. The deed mentions a lot 'A' which, according to the regulations, is actually the division of a larger lot. She fears that the division is unlawful.

Practical application:

If the division was made to individualise already existing parts, it is valid. The purchaser must check the minutes of the general meeting that authorised the division. In case of doubt, a specialised lawyer will examine whether the division created a new dwelling or not.

Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide