Aller au contenu principal
Must be declared inadmissible by
Droit Immobilier

Must be declared inadmissible by

📅 Decision of 26 September 1984🔄 Updated on 4 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 11 views📖 2 min read

Must be declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 607 of the new Code of Civil Procedure, the appeal lodged against the decision of a Court of Appeal which implicitly dismisses the plea of inadmissibility raised by the insurer of a construction company declared in a state of judicial liquidation, based on the lack of standing of the company which sold to third parties the houses affected by defects, to bring an action for repair thereof, and which merely confirms the judgment under appeal which had declared the action admissible and ordered an expert appraisal before ruling on the merits.

Reference decision: Cass. • No. 83-13.369 • 26 September 1984 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Must be declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 607 of the new Code of Civil Procedure, the appeal lodged against the decision of a Court of Appeal which implicitly dismisses the plea of inadmissibility raised by the insurer of a construction company declared in a state of judicial liquidation, based on the lack of standing of the company which sold to third parties the houses affected by defects, to bring an action for repair thereof, and which merely confirms the judgment under appeal which had declared the action admissible and ordered an expert appraisal before ruling on the merits.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, contracts, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 83-13.369
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 26 September 1984

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide