Aller au contenu principal
By noting that the document on which
Droit Immobilier

By noting that the document on which

📅 Decision of 04 January 1995🔄 Updated on 14 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 17 views📖 2 min read

By noting that the document on which a party intended to rely to establish the lack of jurisdiction of the court seised was not an administrative act but a mere letter from the head of the Advertising and Rights of Way Department at the Paris town hall, the trial judges did not interpret an administrative act in order to uphold the jurisdiction of the ordinary courts.

Reference decision: cc • No. 92-21.434 • 1995-01-04 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

By noting that the document on which a party intended to rely to establish the lack of jurisdiction of the court seised was not an administrative act but a mere letter from the head of the Advertising and Rights of Way Department at the Paris town hall, the trial judges did not interpret an administrative act in order to uphold the jurisdiction of the ordinary courts.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Comply strictly with statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 92-21.434
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 04 January 1995

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide