Reference decision: cc • No. 11-21.822 • 2012-10-31 • View the decision →
Imagine: you have been an employee at a notary's office in Capbreton for thirty years. Your employer dismisses you on grounds of physical incapacity. You believe you are entitled to a redundancy payment enhanced by 25% under the national collective agreement for the notarial profession. But your employer argues that the statutory payment is more favourable and pays you that amount. Who is right? This is precisely the question the Court of Cassation decided in its judgment of 31 October 2012.
Although this decision dates back to 2012, it remains highly relevant for all notarial professionals and, more broadly, for any employee covered by a collective agreement. It recalls a fundamental principle: in employment law, the most favourable rule to the employee always applies. But beware, this principle has its limits, as we shall see.
In short, the Court of Cassation upheld the reasoning of the Court of Appeal, which had set aside the contractual 25% enhancement on the ground that, after legislative amendments, the statutory payment had become more advantageous. Thus, only the statutory payment was due. A decision that surprised more than one employee, but which rests on an implacable logic: the collective agreement cannot create a payment less favourable than the law.
The facts: a story that happens every day
Mr X had worked for over thirty years at a notary's office in Saint-Vincent-de-Tyrosse. Dismissed for physical incapacity, he claimed the benefit of the contractual redundancy payment enhanced by 25% pursuant to article 30 of the national collective agreement for the notarial profession of 8 June 2001. This enhancement was provided for employees with more than thirty years' service. In his view, the enhanced contractual payment should apply because it was more favourable than the statutory payment.
The employer, for its part, argued that the enhancement applied only to the calculation of the basic contractual payment, and that since the 2008 and 2010 reforms, the statutory payment had become more favourable. It therefore paid Mr X the statutory payment without the enhancement.
The employee brought the matter before the Dax employment tribunal, then the Pau Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal ruled against him, holding that the statutory payment was indeed more favourable. Mr X then appealed to the Court of Cassation. The High Court upheld the appeal decision: the 25% enhancement applies only to the contractual payment, and if that payment becomes less favourable than the statutory payment, only the latter is due. A real thunderbolt for notarial employees!
The reasoning of the court — dissected
To understand this judgment, we must revisit the principle of favour in employment law. This principle means that when an employee may be entitled to several redundancy payments (statutory, contractual, contractual), the most favourable one applies. Classic.
But here, the problem was different. The collective agreement provided for a contractual payment calculated on the basis of 1/10th of a month's salary per year of service from 10 years onwards, plus a 25% enhancement for employees with more than 30 years' service. However, the law had meanwhile modified the statutory payment. The result: for an employee with 30 years' service, the statutory payment (calculated on the basis of 1/5th of a month's salary per year up to 10 years, then 1/3rd of a month's salary per year beyond) had become higher than the enhanced contractual payment.
The Court of Appeal therefore compared the enhanced contractual payment (with the 25% enhancement) and the statutory payment. Finding that the statutory payment was higher, it logically applied the latter. The Court of Cassation approved this reasoning: the 25% enhancement applies only to the contractual payment; it does not cumulate with the statutory payment. In other words, if you are entitled to the statutory payment, you are not entitled to the contractual enhancement on top.
What few people know is that this judgment enshrines a very strict reading of the collective agreement. The judges considered that the intention of the social partners was to enhance the contractual payment, but not to create an autonomous right to an enhanced statutory payment. In short, the collective agreement cannot be more favourable than the law if the law already offers better.
What this means for you — practically
For notarial employees, this judgment means that you cannot cumulate the statutory payment and the contractual enhancement. Concretely, if you are dismissed after 30 years' service, your employer must calculate both the statutory payment and the enhanced contractual payment, and pay you the higher of the two. But the 25% enhancement only comes into play if the contractual payment (without enhancement) is more favourable than the statutory payment. However, in most cases today, the statutory payment is higher for long careers.
Let's take a numerical example: an employee in Saint-Vincent-de-Tyrosse, with 30 years' service and a reference salary of €2,000. The statutory payment (since 2008) would be: (1/5 * 2,000 * 10) + (1/3 * 2,000 * 20) = 4,000 + 13,333 = €17,333. The contractual payment (article 30) would be: (1/10 * 2,000 * 20 years beyond 10) = €4,000, enhanced by 25% = €5,000. The statutory payment is therefore much more favourable (€17,333 against €5,000). You will therefore receive €17,333, not the enhancement.
For employers, this is good news: they can pay the statutory payment without fear of back pay. But beware: if the contractual payment (without enhancement) were one day to become more favourable, it would apply. So each dismissal must be checked.
undefined, I have come across cases where employees wrongly claimed the enhancement on top of the statutory payment. This judgment puts an end to that confusion. If you are in this situation, you must ask your employer for a comparative calculation of the two payments. If in doubt, do not hesitate to consult a specialised lawyer.
Four tips to avoid this type of dispute
- Systematically check the calculation of your redundancy payment: compare the statutory payment and the contractual payment (with or without enhancement) and retain the highest. Do not rely on a simple reading of the collective agreement without legislative updates.
- Keep your payslips and employment contract: seniority is a key element. In case of a dispute, these documents will allow precise recalculation of your entitlements.
- In case of dismissal for incapacity, request a meeting with your employer to obtain the detailed calculation. The law imposes an obligation to inform, but it is better to be proactive.
- Consult a lawyer before signing any receipt for final settlement: once signed, you can no longer challenge the amount of the payment, except in cases of fraud. Simple advice can save you thousands of euros.
Further reading: related case law and developments
This judgment is part of a consistent line of case law from the Court of Cassation on the principle of favour. Reference can be made to the judgment of 5 March 2008 (No. 06-45.186) which recalls that collective agreements can only derogate from statutory provisions in a sense more favourable to the employee. But the Court also held, in a judgment of 13 November 2013 (No. 12-23.017), that the comparison must be made globally and not element by element.
The trend of the courts is therefore to favour the protection of the employee, but by applying the texts strictly. For the future, if the notarial collective agreement were revised to provide for a more favourable contractual payment, it would take precedence again. In the meantime, employees must rely on the statutory payment, which has been increased several times.
Summary and next steps
FAQ:
- Can I cumulate the statutory payment and the contractual 25% enhancement? No, the enhancement applies only to the contractual payment. You are entitled to the higher of the two, not both.
- What should I do if my employer pays me a payment lower than what I am entitled to? Bring the matter before the employment tribunal within 12 months of the termination of the employment contract. Provide all evidence of your seniority and salary.
- What are the time limits to challenge my dismissal? The limitation period is 12 months from the termination to challenge the amount of the payment, and 2 years to challenge the dismissal itself (except in cases of gross misconduct).
- Does this decision apply to other collective agreements? Yes, the principle is general: any contractual provision less favourable than the law is set aside. But each agreement must be examined on a case-by-case basis.
- Can I negotiate a supra-statutory payment with my employer? Yes, nothing prevents providing for a more favourable contractual payment, but it must be expressly stipulated in the employment contract.
Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.
Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →
