Aller au contenu principal
The contribution due in respect of
Droit Immobilier

The contribution due in respect of

📅 Decision of 21 June 1989🔄 Updated on 17 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 6 views📖 2 min read

The contribution due in respect of accidents at work for salaried workers in inland waterway navigation belonging to the navigating personnel must be determined solely by the regional health insurance fund of Ile-de-France (CRAMIF), Decree No. 67-1232 of 22 December 1967 providing that this personnel falls under a single primary health insurance fund whose area of jurisdiction encompasses the entire national territory and that this Fund, which has its registered office in Paris, is attached to the CRAMIF to the extent of the latter's powers.

Reference decision: cc • N° 87-10.816 • 1989-06-21 • Consult the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The contribution due in respect of accidents at work for salaried workers in inland waterway navigation belonging to the navigating personnel must be determined solely by the regional health insurance fund of Ile-de-France (CRAMIF), Decree No. 67-1232 of 22 December 1967 providing that this personnel falls under a single primary health insurance fund whose area of jurisdiction encompasses the entire national territory and that this Fund, which has its registered office in Paris, is attached to the CRAMIF to the extent of the latter's powers.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for legal remedies
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 87-10.816
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 21 June 1989

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide