Aller au contenu principal
The Criminal Court Cannot
Droit Foncier

The Criminal Court Cannot

📅 Decision of 03 April 2001🔄 Updated on 17 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 17 views📖 2 min read

The criminal court cannot rule on a contentious incident concerning the execution of a previous decision without all interested parties having been able to present their observations. Therefore, a judgment that granted the application for annulment of the enforcement order issued by a municipal collector for the recovery of a periodic penalty payment in an urban planning matter, assessed by the mayor, without the mayor or the commune, a civil party, having been called to present their observations, must be quashed.

Reference decision: Cass. • No. 00-87.294 • 3 April 2001 • Consult the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The criminal court cannot rule on a contentious incident concerning the execution of a previous decision without all interested parties having been able to present their observations. Therefore, a judgment that granted the application for annulment of the enforcement order issued by a municipal collector for the recovery of a periodic penalty payment in an urban planning matter, assessed by the mayor, without the mayor or the commune, a civil party, having been called to present their observations, must be quashed.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 00-87.294
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 03 April 2001

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide