Aller au contenu principal
Advertising relating to a sale,
Droit Immobilier

Advertising relating to a sale,

📅 Decision of 27 February 1996🔄 Updated on 4 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 views📖 2 min read

Advertising relating to a sale, the valuation of movable property, the receipt of sale requisitions, purchase orders, and the settlement of sale costs exceed mere preparatory acts for public auction sales. Consequently, such activity, in the departments of Haut-Rhin, Bas-Rhin and Moselle, infringes the monopoly of the bailiffs and notaries of those departments in organising and conducting public auction sales, irrespective of the fact that a local ministerial officer conducted the sale.

Reference decision: cc • N° 93-16.368 • 1996-02-27 • View decision →

This decision provides important insight into your real estate law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Advertising relating to a sale, the valuation of movable property, the receipt of sale requisitions, purchase orders, and the settlement of sale costs exceed mere preparatory acts for public auction sales. Consequently, such activity, in the departments of Haut-Rhin, Bas-Rhin and Moselle, infringes the monopoly of the bailiffs and notaries of those departments in organising and conducting public auction sales, irrespective of the fact that a local ministerial officer conducted the sale.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 93-16.368
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 27 February 1996

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide