Aller au contenu principal
Subrogation occurs by operation of law
Droit Immobilier

Subrogation occurs by operation of law

📅 Decision of 03 December 1985🔄 Updated on 16 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 20 views📖 2 min read

Subrogation occurs by operation of law for the benefit of a person who, being bound with others or for others to pay the debt, had an interest in paying it. The Court of Appeal violates this provision where, in order to declare a company's claim preferential, it held that, following payment of the tax debts of property companies guaranteed by it, that company was legally subrogated to the rights of the Treasury against a company in receivership which had granted it a counter-guarantee, whereas the judgment had noted that the latter company "was not liable to the Treasury".

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 84-11.929 • 1985-12-03 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Subrogation occurs by operation of law for the benefit of a person who, being bound with others or for others to pay the debt, had an interest in paying it. The Court of Appeal violates this provision where, in order to declare a company's claim preferential, it held that, following payment of the tax debts of property companies guaranteed by it, that company was legally subrogated to the rights of the Treasury against a company in receivership which had granted it a counter-guarantee, whereas the judgment had noted that the latter company "was not liable to the Treasury".

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Scrupulously respect the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, acts, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 84-11.929
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 03 December 1985

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide