Aller au contenu principal
Failure to Notify a
Droit Immobilier

Failure to Notify a

📅 Decision of 24 September 2014🔄 Updated on 6 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 29 views📖 2 min read

The failure to notify a co-owner of the order appointing a provisional administrator is not penalised by the unenforceability of the acts he performs but has the consequence of not starting the time limit for appeal in respect of that co-owner.

Reference decision: cc • No. 13-20.169 • 2014-09-24 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The failure to notify a co-owner of the order appointing a provisional administrator is not penalised by the unenforceability of the acts he performs but has the consequence of not starting the time limit for appeal in respect of that co-owner.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly adhere to legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 13-20.169
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 24 September 2014

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Practical use cases

1

Co-owner discovers un-notified provisional administrator after 6 months

Sophie, a co-owner in a Nice apartment block, receives a letter about unexpected charge increases. She learns that a court appointed a provisional administrator six months ago, but she never received official notification—no registered mail, no email. She wants to challenge the appointment as she questions its necessity.

Practical application:

Because Sophie was not properly notified of the appointment order, the appeal time limit never started for her. She should gather evidence of non-notification (e.g., absence of postal receipts, witness statements) and file an appeal against the owner’s association without delay. This court decision protects her right to contest the appointment even months after it was made.

2

Overseas landlord misses administrator notification, faces property decisions

Marc, a British landlord renting out his flat in Paris, only discovers that a provisional administrator took charge of the co-ownership when his tenant casually mentions workmen in communal areas. The notice was sent to the flat, not his registered UK address, so he never received it. The administrator has already approved costly façade repairs.

Practical application:

The failure to notify Marc personally means the appeal period against the administrator’s appointment and subsequent decisions has not begun. He should immediately instruct a French lawyer to formally contest the appointment and the repair authorisations, relying on this case law. To prevent future issues, he must update his correspondence address with the property manager, using a reliable forwarding method.

3

First-time buyers inherit undisclosed provisional administrator and special levies

Emma and Julien, first-time buyers in Lyon, moved into their apartment two months ago. They were shocked to receive a bill for a special levy of €3,500 from a provisional administrator appointed before their purchase. Neither the seller nor the notary mentioned this, and they never received any notification from the court or the administrator.

Practical application:

As new co-owners, Emma and Julien were entitled to be notified of the administration order. If they weren’t, the appeal deadline never started for them. They should contact the notary who handled the sale to confirm how the seller was notified, then consider appealing the appointment on grounds of non-notification, citing this decision. If the levy is excessive, they may also challenge the administrator’s authority to impose it without proper notice.

Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide