Aller au contenu principal
Action in Liability
Droit Immobilier

Action in Liability

📅 Decision of 16 October 2002🔄 Updated on 17 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 26 views📖 2 min read

The action in contractual liability against builders is time-barred after ten years from acceptance of the works, with or without reservations. It follows that the general contractual liability of a builder, for breach of the duty to advise, cannot be invoked, as regards defects affecting the works, beyond a period of ten years from acceptance (judgment no. 1). Likewise, the action of an individual house builder against a works contractor, relating to defects that were the subject of reservations at acceptance, is inadmissible where that action was brought more than ten years after acceptance; and the action of the purchasers against the building owner, brought before the expiry of the statutory warranty period, does not have the effect of rendering admissible the recourse action brought by the latter against the works contractors after the expiry of that period (judgment no. 2).

Reference decision: cc • No. 01-10.330 • 2002-10-16 • View the decision →

This decision provides important clarity on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The action in contractual liability against builders is time-barred after ten years from acceptance of the works, with or without reservations. It follows that the general contractual liability of a builder, for breach of the duty to advise, cannot be invoked, as regards defects affecting the works, beyond a period of ten years from acceptance (judgment no. 1). Likewise, the action of an individual house builder against a works contractor, relating to defects that were the subject of reservations at acceptance, is inadmissible where that action was brought more than ten years after acceptance; and the action of the purchasers against the building owner, brought before the expiry of the statutory warranty period, does not have the effect of rendering admissible the recourse action brought by the latter against the works contractors after the expiry of that period (judgment no. 2).

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for bringing claims
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 01-10.330
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 16 October 2002

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide