Aller au contenu principal
The Application of Article L
Droit Immobilier

The Application of Article L

📅 Decision of 12 May 2004🔄 Updated on 6 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 views📖 2 min read

The application of Article L. 231-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, which does not require the builder to systematically carry out soil surveys prior to the signing of construction contracts, the only penalty provided being the impossibility for the builder to demand from the project owner any sums other than those contractually provided for, does not prevent the builder from claiming, on the basis of Article 1382 of the Civil Code, from a third party at fault, the costs of soil surveys that he cannot claim from the project owner.

Reference decision: cc • No. 02-20.911 • 2004-05-12 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your real estate law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The application of Article L. 231-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, which does not require the builder to systematically carry out soil surveys prior to the signing of construction contracts, the only penalty provided being the impossibility for the builder to demand from the project owner any sums other than those contractually provided for, does not prevent the builder from claiming, on the basis of Article 1382 of the Civil Code, from a third party at fault, the costs of soil surveys that he cannot claim from the project owner.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for bringing an action
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: a 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 02-20.911
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 12 May 2004

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide