Aller au contenu principal
The lease granted to a prospective tenant
Droit Immobilier

The lease granted to a prospective tenant

📅 Decision of 25 April 1983🔄 Updated on 4 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 18 views📖 2 min read

The lease granted to a tenant for the purpose of carrying on his business has, as regards him, the character of a commercial act whose proof is not subject to the provisions of article 1328 of the Civil Code. This tenant is therefore entitled to rely on his lease, which has not acquired a fixed date, against another tenant, also a trader, who had the benefit of a lease concerning the same thing, granted subsequently and registered.

Reference decision: cc • No. 81-16.804 • 25 April 1983 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The lease granted to a tenant for the purpose of carrying on his business has, as regards him, the character of a commercial act whose proof is not subject to the provisions of article 1328 of the Civil Code. This tenant is therefore entitled to rely on his lease, which has not acquired a fixed date, against another tenant, also a trader, who had the benefit of a lease concerning the same thing, granted subsequently and registered.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Scrupulously comply with the legal time limits for bringing proceedings
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 81-16.804
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 25 April 1983

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Practical use cases

1

Bakery Tenant's Unregistered Lease Prevails Over Later Registered Lease

In Lyon, a baker signed a 9-year commercial lease in January 2023 with a monthly rent of €1,200 but did not register it. In June 2023, the landlord leased the same premises to a rival café, who registered their lease immediately. The café now demands the baker vacate, claiming priority due to registration.

Practical application:

Under this case law, the baker's lease is a commercial act, so its proof against the café does not require a fixed date (date certaine) from registration. The baker can enforce his earlier lease against the later tenant even without registration. He should formally notify the café and landlord of his priority, ideally via a bailiff's notice (huissier), and if necessary, initiate legal proceedings to maintain possession. Keeping the original signed lease and all correspondence is crucial.

2

Landlord's Double Lease: Unregistered First Tenant Wins

A landlord in Bordeaux rented a shop to a florist under a 3-6-9 commercial lease in March 2022 at €800/month, but the florist never registered it. Seeking higher income, the landlord signed a second lease with a boutique in September 2022 for €1,100/month, which was promptly registered. The florist refuses to leave, and the boutique demands vacant possession.

Practical application:

Because the florist's lease is a commercial act, it is enforceable against the boutique without a fixed date, giving the florist priority. The landlord faces potential liability: the boutique can claim damages for failure to deliver vacant possession (obligation de délivrance) and possibly seek annulment of their lease. The landlord should negotiate a buyout of the florist's leasehold rights (droit au bail) or compensate the boutique for its losses to avoid litigation.

3

Registered Lease Cannot Override Prior Unregistered Commercial Lease

In Nice, a restaurateur signed a commercial lease in April 2024 with a €3,000 monthly rent and registered it immediately. Unbeknownst to him, the landlord had already leased the same premises to a bookshop in January 2024 without registration. The bookshop occupies the property and refuses to vacate, while the restaurateur demands to take possession.

Practical application:

The restaurateur's timely registration does not grant priority over the bookshop's earlier lease, as the bookshop's lease is a commercial act not subject to the fixed date rule. The restaurateur should put the landlord on formal notice to resolve the conflict and provide vacant possession. If the landlord cannot, the restaurateur may terminate his lease for non-performance and claim damages, including reimbursement of registration costs and lost profits. Consulting a French real estate lawyer promptly is advised to enforce these rights.

Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide