Aller au contenu principal
Provisions of the Decree of 30 September 1953
Droit Immobilier

Provisions of the Decree of 30 September 1953

📅 Decision of 25 January 1983🔄 Updated on 11 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 26 views📖 2 min read

The provisions of the Decree of 30 September 1953 may only be invoked by the owner of the business operated on the premises. The judgment is legally justified which rejects the claim brought by the lease-manager of an educational business operated in part of a building and seeking to have the lease of premises located in another part of the same building declared governed by the provisions of the Decree of 30 September 1953, since the Court of Appeal finds that the lease-manager does not prove the existence in the leased premises of a business distinct from the one he operates under the lease-management contract.

Reference decision: cc • N° 81-13.588 • 1983-01-25 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your real estate law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The provisions of the Decree of 30 September 1953 may only be invoked by the owner of the business operated on the premises. The judgment is legally justified which rejects the claim brought by the lease-manager of an educational business operated in part of a building and seeking to have the lease of premises located in another part of the same building declared governed by the provisions of the Decree of 30 September 1953, since the Court of Appeal finds that the lease-manager does not prove the existence in the leased premises of a business distinct from the one he operates under the lease-management contract.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly respect the legal deadlines for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (titles, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 81-13.588
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 25 January 1983

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide