Aller au contenu principal
Does not commit an offence under Article
Droit Foncier

Does not commit an offence under Article

📅 Decision of 03 May 1983🔄 Updated on 16 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 29 views📖 2 min read

A mayor who orders the interruption of the water supply to dwellings in his municipality following non-payment of tax and water supply charges does not commit an offence under Article 14 of the Yvelines departmental health regulations, since this provision only prescribes measures intended to ensure the supply of drinking water to dwellings in satisfactory conditions and in no way imposes on a mayor the obligation to distribute water free of charge to all inhabitants of the municipality.

Reference decision: cc • N° 82-93.708 • 1983-05-03 • View decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A mayor who orders the interruption of the water supply to dwellings in his municipality following non-payment of tax and water supply charges does not commit an offence under Article 14 of the Yvelines departmental health regulations, since this provision only prescribes measures intended to ensure the supply of drinking water to dwellings in satisfactory conditions and in no way imposes on a mayor the obligation to distribute water free of charge to all inhabitants of the municipality.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to note

  • Comply strictly with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 82-93.708
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 03 May 1983

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide