Aller au contenu principal
Deferral of Paid Leave in Case of Illness: The Decision That Changes Everything for Employees
Droit-immobilier

Deferral of Paid Leave in Case of Illness: The Decision That Changes Everything for Employees

📅 Decision of 24 February 2009🔄 Updated on 18 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 views📖 6 min read

Can an employee defer unused paid leave due to illness? Yes, according to the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation), which requires deferral after a long illness. Discover employees' rights and employers' obligations.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 07-44.488 • 2009-02-24 • View Decision →

Imagine the scene: in Villeneuve-lès-Avignon, Sophie, a care assistant in a nursing home (Ehpad), falls seriously ill in November 2005. She is on sick leave until March 2007. Upon her return, her employer informs her that she has lost her 12.5 days of paid leave accrued in 2005 because she did not take them before her leave. This situation, you may be experiencing it now, or you fear it might happen to a loved one. The question is simple: can an employee defer unused paid leave due to illness? The answer is yes, and it comes from the French Supreme Court in a decision of 24 February 2009 (No. 07-44.488). This decision, based on European law, protects employees who could not take their leave due to absence for illness, work accident or occupational disease. But what exactly does it change? Let's dive into the details.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

The case begins in Creil, in the Oise department. An employee, employed by the Primary Health Insurance Fund (CPAM) of Creil, is absent due to illness from 17 November 2005 to 1 March 2007. Before her leave, she had accrued 12.5 days of paid leave for the year 2005, but she could not take them due to her state of health. Upon her return, she requests the deferral of these days to the year 2007. Her employer refuses, considering that the leave not taken before 31 May 2006 is lost, in accordance with the French Labour Code. The employee then brings the matter before the employment tribunal's interim relief judge, who orders the deferral. The employer challenges this, but the French Supreme Court confirms the decision. The judges' reasoning is based on European Directive 2003/88/EC, which sets out the purpose of annual leave: to allow the employee to rest and recuperate. However, if the employee could not take their leave because they were ill, this purpose is not fulfilled. In clear terms, the right to leave does not automatically expire at the end of the reference period. What few people know is that this solution also applies to work accidents and occupational diseases. undefined, I have encountered cases where employees, after a long absence, were deprived of their leave, creating a deeply unfair situation.

The Reasoning of the Court — Dissected

The French Supreme Court relies on European Directive 2003/88/EC, which requires Member States to guarantee every worker at least four weeks of paid annual leave. The purpose of this leave is to allow the employee to rest and preserve their health. If the employee is ill during the period when they should have taken their leave, they cannot fully benefit from it. The judges therefore consider that the accrued leave must be deferred after the return to work, otherwise the right to leave would be rendered meaningless. Concretely, the Court ordered the deferral of the 12.5 days of leave not taken in 2005 to the year 2007. However, this deferral is not automatic for all leave. It concerns employees who were unable to take their leave due to an absence related to illness, work accident or occupational disease. In other words, if the employee chose not to take their leave while in good health, the deferral is not owed. The decision confirms an evolution of French law towards better protection of employees, in compliance with European law. The employer's arguments (loss of leave not taken within the legal deadline) were dismissed in favour of the purpose of leave.

What This Changes for You — Concretely

For an employee, this decision is a lifeline. If you are absent due to illness or accident and could not take your leave, you can demand its deferral after your return. For example, an employee in Bagnols-sur-Cèze, absent for six months due to an occupational disease, can defer their 15 days of leave to the following year. For the employer, this means anticipating: providing in the payroll software the possibility of deferring unused leave for medical reasons, and informing employees of their rights. If you are a landlord, this decision has no direct impact, but it illustrates the importance of European law in labour relations. For a co-owner, it is a reminder that rights do not always expire on a deadline. How to react? If you are an employee, keep your sick leave certificates and send a written request to your employer as soon as you return, citing this decision. In case of refusal, bring the matter before the employment tribunal. Time limits: you have up to 2 years after your return to act. The amounts involved can be significant: 12.5 days of leave represent about half a month's salary.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • For employees: Keep all your sick leave certificates and request in writing the deferral of your unused leave as soon as you return. Use registered mail with acknowledgement of receipt.
  • For employers: Set up an internal procedure to manage the deferral of leave in case of illness. Train your HR staff on the French Supreme Court's case law.
  • For both parties: Check the applicable collective agreement: some provide for more favourable deferral rules.
  • In case of dispute: Consult a lawyer specialising in labour law before initiating proceedings. Mediation can sometimes resolve the conflict without going to court.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Before this 2009 decision, the French Supreme Court considered that leave not taken within the year was lost, unless the employer agreed. The 2009 decision marks a reversal, influenced by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). For example, in the Schultz-Hoff case (2006), the CJEU had already held that the right to leave does not expire at the end of the reference period if the employee was on sick leave. Since 2009, French courts have extended this principle: deferral is possible even for non-occupational illnesses, provided the absence prevented the effective taking of leave. The trend is clear: judges protect the right to rest. For the future, we can expect employers to be required to systematically offer deferral, subject to damages.

Key Points to Remember

  1. Who is affected? Any employee on sick leave, work accident or occupational disease.
  2. Which leave? Paid leave accrued before the absence and not taken due to the absence.
  3. When to request deferral? As soon as you return to work, in writing.
  4. What to do in case of refusal? Bring the matter before the employment tribunal within 2 years.
  5. Caution: Deferral is not automatic if the employee refused to take their leave while in good health.

Are you in a similar situation? An initial 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 07-44.488
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 24 February 2009

Keywords

congés payésreport congés maladiejurisprudencedroit du travailCour de cassation

Practical use cases

1

Employee on Long-Term Sick Leave

Sophie, a care assistant in Villeneuve-lès-Avignon, is on sick leave for 16 months. She had 12.5 days of unused leave. Upon her return, her employer refuses deferral. She takes the case to the employment tribunal and wins thanks to the 2009 decision.

Practical application:

Sophie must send a registered letter to her employer immediately upon her return, requesting deferral of her 12.5 days. In case of refusal, she can bring the matter before the employment tribunal of Nîmes within 2 years. She will recover her days and can take them within the year following her return.

2

Employer Facing a Deferral Request

A small shop in Bagnols-sur-Cèze employs a salesperson who was on sick leave due to a work accident for 6 months. Upon his return, he requests deferral of 10 days of leave. The employer hesitates because the leave of other employees has already been planned.

Practical application:

The employer must grant the deferral, even if it disrupts organisation. He can propose alternative dates. If he refuses, he risks a conviction by the employment tribunal. It is better to anticipate by including a clause in the internal regulations.

3

Employee Who Chose Not to Take Leave

A healthy employee in Nîmes decides not to take his 15 days of leave in 2022 to accumulate them with the following year. His employer refuses. He invokes the 2009 decision, but it does not apply because he was not ill.

Practical application:

The employee cannot demand deferral. Leave not taken by choice is lost as of 31 May of the following year. He must negotiate with his employer for an exceptional deferral, but without guarantee. The only legal solution is to take the leave on time.

Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide