Aller au contenu principal
Se rend complice du délit de fraude
Droit Immobilier

Se rend complice du délit de fraude

📅 Decision of 22 December 1986🔄 Updated on 9 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 views📖 2 min read

Se rend complice du délit de fraude fiscale commis par son client le notaire qui prête son concours, bien que sachant que les actes pour l'établissement desquels son office est requis, constituent compte tenu de leur simultanéité et des majorations fictives de prix l'instrument nécessaire et obligé de la fraude (1).

Décision de référence : cc • N° 85-91.140 • 1986-12-22 • Consulter la décision →

Cette décision apporte un éclairage important sur votre droit immobilier. Voici ce qu'elle change pour vous.

La situation

Se rend complice du délit de fraude fiscale commis par son client le notaire qui prête son concours, bien que sachant que les actes pour l'établissement desquels son office est requis, constituent compte tenu de leur simultanéité et des majorations fictives de prix l'instrument nécessaire et obligé de la fraude (1).

Ce que dit la loi

Cette décision confirme les principes fondamentaux du droit de la propriété.

Points à retenir

  • Respectez scrupuleusement les délais légaux de recours
  • Conservez tous vos documents justificatifs (titres, actes, courriers)
  • Anticipez : un conseil préventif coûte toujours moins cher qu'un litige

Pour une analyse de votre situation : consultation 30 min à 45€ avec Maître Zakine.

📌 Cet article vous concerne ? Maître Cécile Zakine, avocate en droit immobilier et foncier, Docteur en droit, intervient dans toute la France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Tous nos articles juridiques

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 85-91.140
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 22 December 1986

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Practical use cases

1

Buyer pressured to under-declare Paris apartment price

A first-time buyer in Paris (10th arrondissement) finds a two-bedroom flat at €450,000. The seller suggests declaring only €350,000 to the notary and paying the difference in cash, claiming it is common practice.

Practical application:

This case law confirms that a notary who knowingly drafts such under-valued deeds can be treated as an accomplice to tax fraud. You risk heavy tax penalties and criminal liability if you accept the arrangement. Refuse the under-declaration, insist that the full price appears in the official deed, and if necessary, report the proposal to the notary or the tax authorities.

2

Farmer selling land with inflated price to get credit

A farmer near Lyon (Rhône) plans to sell a field to a developer for €200,000. The developer asks to sign two simultaneous deeds—one for €300,000 and a second, void deed—so the developer can obtain a larger bank loan; the farmer fears being sued later for complicity.

Practical application:

The court ruled that a notary who lends his office to simultaneous deeds containing fictitious price increases provides the necessary instrument of fraud. Such a scheme is illegal and can render the sale void, exposing both parties to criminal charges. The farmer should insist on a single deed reflecting the true price and consult an agricultural-law solicitor before signing if the developer continues to press the arrangement.

3

Developer discovers notary's loan fraud scheme in Marseille

A property developer in Marseille (Bouches-du-Rhône) learns that his usual notary has been overstating sale prices on several developments to help foreign buyers secure visas and loans. The developer worries about being drawn into tax fraud charges for transactions completed during the past two years.

Practical application:

This decision warns that any professional—including a notary—who knowingly supplies the means for fraud can be prosecuted as a co-offender. If you have unwittingly participated, stop immediately and seek legal advice on how to disclose past transactions to the tax authorities. Commission a forensic audit of all sale deeds and change notary to demonstrate good faith and avoid further liability.

Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide