Aller au contenu principal
If, under Article L
Droit Immobilier

If, under Article L

📅 Decision of 12 July 2018🔄 Updated on 5 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 18 views📖 2 min read

If, under Article L. 323-6 of the Social Security Code, as amended by Law No. 2010-1594 of 20 December 2010, the courts with jurisdiction over general social security disputes review, in the event of an appeal against decisions relating to the recovery of the daily allowances it provides for, the proportionality of the penalty imposed by the fund to the seriousness of the breach committed by the insured person, these provisions do not give the recovery of undue payments the character of a punitive sanction and therefore do not preclude the application of the financial penalty provided for by Article L. 162-1-14, now L. 114-17-1 of the same Code. A court with jurisdiction over general social security disputes therefore infringes those provisions if it holds that such a penalty cannot be combined, pursuant to the ne bis in idem principle, with a claim for recovery of unduly paid daily allowances.

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 17-16.539 • 2018-07-12 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

If, under Article L. 323-6 of the Social Security Code, as amended by Law No. 2010-1594 of 20 December 2010, the courts with jurisdiction over general social security disputes review, in the event of an appeal against decisions relating to the recovery of the daily allowances it provides for, the proportionality of the penalty imposed by the fund to the seriousness of the breach committed by the insured person, these provisions do not give the recovery of undue payments the character of a punitive sanction and therefore do not preclude the application of the financial penalty provided for by Article L. 162-1-14, now L. 114-17-1 of the same Code. A court with jurisdiction over general social security disputes therefore infringes those provisions if it holds that such a penalty cannot be combined, pursuant to the ne bis in idem principle, with a claim for recovery of unduly paid daily allowances.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Scrupulously comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 17-16.539
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 12 July 2018

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide