Aller au contenu principal
A company, of which it is not
Droit Immobilier

A company, of which it is not

📅 Decision of 07 April 2016🔄 Updated on 18 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 20 views📖 2 min read

A company, which it is not disputed took over the obligations arising from a contract of sale entered into by its members during its period of formation, is deemed, in view of the retroactive effect attached to that act of assumption, to have owned the property in question from the outset and thereby establishes its standing, since it brought an action for a reduction in the price less than one year after the sale, irrespective of the fact that that act occurred after the one-year period laid down in Article 46 of Law No. 65-557 of 10 July 1965.

Reference decision: cc • N° 15-10.881 • 2016-04-07 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A company, which it is not disputed took over the obligations arising from a contract of sale entered into by its members during its period of formation, is deemed, in view of the retroactive effect attached to that act of assumption, to have owned the property in question from the outset and thereby establishes its standing, since it brought an action for a reduction in the price less than one year after the sale, irrespective of the fact that that act occurred after the one-year period laid down in Article 46 of Law No. 65-557 of 10 July 1965

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Comply strictly with the legal time limits for bringing an action
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 15-10.881
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 07 April 2016

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide