Aller au contenu principal
Violates Articles 15, 16 and 68 of the New Code of Civil Procedure
Droit Immobilier

Violates Articles 15, 16 and 68 of the New Code of Civil Procedure

📅 Decision of 10 July 1991🔄 Updated on 9 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 views📖 2 min read

The employment tribunal violates Articles 15, 16 and 68 of the New Code of Civil Procedure when, where the amicable liquidator of a company has not appeared, it takes note of the modification of an employee's claim and allows it, given that, on the one hand, it does not appear from the proceedings that the opposing party was duly informed of the employee's new claim, and that, on the other hand, since a new claim is admissible until the close of the proceedings, it is for the court to ensure that the principle of adversarial proceedings is observed in relation to it.

Reference decision: cc • No. 88-41.902 • 1991-07-10 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The employment tribunal violates Articles 15, 16 and 68 of the New Code of Civil Procedure when, where the amicable liquidator of a company has not appeared, it takes note of the modification of an employee's claim and allows it, given that, on the one hand, it does not appear from the proceedings that the opposing party was duly informed of the employee's new claim, and that, on the other hand, since a new claim is admissible until the close of the proceedings, it is for the court to ensure that the principle of adversarial proceedings is observed in relation to it.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Strictly comply with statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 88-41.902
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 10 July 1991

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide