Aller au contenu principal
Violates Articles 17 and 18 of the Law
Droit Immobilier

Violates Articles 17 and 18 of the Law

📅 Decision of 12 December 2001🔄 Updated on 18 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 33 views📖 2 min read

Violates Articles 17 and 18 of the Law of 10 July 1965 a court of appeal which, in order to limit the amount of damages owed to a co-ownership syndicate by its provisional administrator, holds that the administrator cannot be blamed for not having suspended works decided by a general meeting judicially annulled before his appointment, as he acted to safeguard the rights of the co-ownership, and that the fees paid to the project manager were justified, his intervention being necessary given the winding-up of the company which had entered into the initial works contract, without specifying the conditions under which the continuation of the works was decided and the contract was concluded with the project manager.

Reference decision: cc • No. 00-12.482 • 2001-12-12 • Consult the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Violates Articles 17 and 18 of the Law of 10 July 1965 a court of appeal which, in order to limit the amount of damages owed to a co-ownership syndicate by its provisional administrator, holds that the administrator cannot be blamed for not having suspended works decided by a general meeting judicially annulled before his appointment, as he acted to safeguard the rights of the co-ownership, and that the fees paid to the project manager were justified, his intervention being necessary given the winding-up of the company which had entered into the initial works contract, without specifying the conditions under which the continuation of the works was decided and the contract was concluded with the project manager.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Scrupulously respect the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 00-12.482
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 12 December 2001

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Practical use cases

1

Co-owner faces unexpected charge for unauthorised works

You own a flat in a co-ownership building in Lyon and receive a special levy of €5,000 for façade renovation works. The works were started by a provisional administrator after the original general meeting resolution was annulled, and you suspect proper procedures weren't followed.

Practical application:

Under the case law, a provisional administrator cannot simply continue annulled works without specifying the conditions of that continuation and how the new contract with the project manager was concluded. Request the minutes of any decision approving the works and the project manager contract. If none exist, contest the levy in writing to the syndic and, if necessary, seek a court order to have the charge invalidated. Gather evidence such as the annulment judgment and correspondence with the administrator.

2

Landlord hit with high service charges after provisional administrator acts

You own three flats in a co-ownership in Nice and have been charged €15,000 for lift replacement works. A provisional administrator appointed after the previous decision was annulled went ahead with the works and hired a new contractor without clear authorisation.

Practical application:

Vous pouvez exiger du syndic qu'il convoque une assemblée générale pour régulariser la situation, en vous appuyant sur l'obligation de préciser les conditions de la poursuite des travaux selon cet arrêt. En l'absence de régularisation, vous pouvez refuser de payer votre quote-part et solliciter des dommages-intérêts pour le préjudice subi. Il est recommandé d'adresser une mise en demeure écrite et de conserver toutes les preuves de l'annulation antérieure.

3

First-time buyer inherits debt from invalidated works

You've just bought a studio in a Paris co-ownership and now face a €3,500 demand for roof works that were ordered by a provisional administrator before your purchase, but the original authorising general meeting resolution was judicially annulled.

Practical application:

This case clarifies that a provisional administrator cannot be held harmless for continuing annulled works unless the court specifies how the continuation was decided and the contract was concluded. As a new owner, you are liable for charges voted before your purchase, but if the works lacked proper authorisation, you can dispute the debt. Ask the seller for the administrator's decisions and any court rulings. If no valid justification exists, refuse payment and seek legal advice to annul the levy.

Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide