Aller au contenu principal
Complaint without payment: when legal aid saves your action
Droit-immobilier

Complaint without payment: when legal aid saves your action

📅 Décision du 13 September 2022⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation annuls a decision of inadmissibility of a complaint for failure to pay a deposit when the civil party obtained legal aid before the investigating chamber ruled. Explanations and practical advice.

Reference decision: cc • N° 22-80.893 • 2022-09-13 • View the decision →

Imagine: you own a flat in Plaisir, and your tenant has deliberately damaged the property. You file a complaint with a civil party application. The investigating judge imposes a deposit of 250 euros, which you cannot pay. Your complaint is declared inadmissible. What should you do?

This question is asked by hundreds of litigants every year. The deposit is a sum of money that the judge may require to guarantee payment of a possible civil fine. But for the less well-off, it can constitute an insurmountable obstacle to access to justice.

The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 13 September 2022 (n° 22-80.893), reminds that obtaining legal aid, even during appeal, retrospectively dispenses with the payment of the deposit. A decision that gives hope to those who feared their action would be blocked by financial considerations.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mr X, owner of a property in Poissy, was the victim of fraud by his tenant. He files a complaint with a civil party application before the dean of the investigating judges. The magistrate sets the deposit amount at 250 euros, to be paid within one month.

Impossible for Mr X: his income is modest, he lives on odd jobs. The deadline passes, the deposit is not paid. The judge issues an order noting the inadmissibility of the complaint, in accordance with Article 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Mr X appeals.

In the meantime, he applied for legal aid. Nearly three months later, the legal aid office grants him full aid. But the investigating chamber of the Paris Court of Appeal, unaware of this decision, confirms the inadmissibility order. Mr X appeals to the Court of Cassation.

The reasoning of the court — dissected

The Court of Cassation quashes the decision of the investigating chamber without referral. Its reasoning is simple: Article 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (which allows the judge to require a deposit) provides that a civil party who benefits from legal aid is exempt from this deposit. It does not matter when the application for aid was made.

In this case, Mr X obtained legal aid before the investigating chamber ruled on his appeal. Therefore, he was exempt from the deposit. The investigating chamber should have taken this into account, even if Mr X did not rely on it. Why? Because Article 57 of Decree n° 2020-1717 of 28 December 2020 requires the secretary of the legal aid office to inform the clerk of the court seised of the decision granting aid. This is an obligation, not a mere option.

The Court thus sanctions the failure to comply with this duty to inform. It reminds that the litigant cannot be criticised for not having reported the obtaining of legal aid, since the burden of information lies with the administration. This is a concrete application of the principle of procedural fairness and effective access to justice.

This decision does not create a reversal, but it clarifies and strengthens the protection afforded to the most deprived civil parties. It is part of a consistent line of case law from the Court of Cassation aimed at facilitating access to justice (see, for example, Crim., 10 March 2021, n° 20-82.456).

What this changes for you — concretely

For the landlord owner: if you are the victim of an offence (damage, unpaid rent by fraud), you can file a complaint with a civil party application. If the judge sets a deposit that you cannot pay, do not give up. Apply for legal aid as soon as possible. Even if the deposit deadline has passed, obtaining aid before the investigating chamber rules on your appeal exempts you from the deposit.

For the tenant: you have been the victim of a dishonest landlord (for example, unhealthy housing, illegal eviction). Same principle: do not let the deposit block you. Apply for legal aid without delay.

Concrete example: let us take a co-owner in Poissy, victim of an abuse of confidence by the management company. The judge sets a deposit of 500 euros. His income is 1,200 euros per month. He can obtain partial legal aid. If he requests it before the investigating chamber rules, the deposit is waived. Saving: 500 euros, almost half of his monthly income.

If you are in this situation, you must: 1) apply for legal aid as soon as possible; 2) inform your lawyer of this application; 3) do not wait for the outcome of the aid to appeal the inadmissibility order; 4) check that the registry has indeed been informed of the granting of aid.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Anticipate the deposit: as soon as you consider filing a complaint with a civil party application, assess your resources. If you are eligible for legal aid, submit the application at the same time as the complaint.
  • Respect deadlines: the appeal against the inadmissibility order must be lodged within 10 days of its notification. Even if you do not yet have aid, appeal to preserve your rights.
  • Ensure information flows: ask your lawyer to check with the registry that the decision granting aid has reached them. If in doubt, send a copy of the decision yourself.
  • Consult a specialist lawyer: criminal procedures are complex. An experienced lawyer in property and criminal law will save you from fatal mistakes. In Plaisir or Poissy, Maître Zakine can assist you.

This decision echoes a judgment of the Criminal Chamber of 10 March 2021 (n° 20-82.456) which had already held that obtaining legal aid during proceedings regularises the situation, even if the deposit was not paid within the initial deadline. The Court of Cassation goes further here by imposing on the administration the duty to inform the court automatically.

However, a divergence existed with some courts of appeal which required the civil party to rely on the aid obtained themselves. The Court of Cassation puts an end to this requirement, strengthening protection. The trend is therefore clearly favourable to less affluent litigants.

In the future, this case law could lead to a simplification of procedures: the investigating judge could, before setting a deposit, check ex officio whether the civil party is eligible for legal aid. This would avoid unnecessary back-and-forth.

Summary and next steps

FAQ

1. What is the deposit? It is a sum of money that the judge may require from the civil party to guarantee payment of a possible civil fine. Its amount is freely set by the judge.

2. What should I do if I cannot pay the deposit? Apply for legal aid. If it is granted, you are exempt from the deposit, even if the deadline has passed.

3. Must I appeal the inadmissibility order? Yes, within 10 days of its notification. Even if you do not yet have aid, the appeal preserves your rights. Aid obtained afterwards will regularise the situation.

4. Who must inform the court of the granting of aid? The secretary of the legal aid office has an obligation to inform the registry. But for greater safety, your lawyer can also do so.

5. How much does a consultation with Maître Zakine cost? €45 for a first 30-minute consultation, which can save you months of proceedings.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que la consignation dans une plainte pénale ?

La consignation est une somme d'argent que le juge d'instruction peut exiger de la partie civile pour garantir le paiement d'une éventuelle amende civile. Elle est prévue à l'article 88 du code de procédure pénale.

Que faire si je n'ai pas payé la consignation dans le délai ?

Vous pouvez demander l'aide juridictionnelle. Si vous l'obtenez avant que la chambre de l'instruction ne statue sur votre appel, vous êtes dispensé de la consignation, même si le délai est expiré.

L'aide juridictionnelle efface-t-elle la consignation ?

Oui, l'obtention de l'aide juridictionnelle, même après le délai de consignation, vous dispense de payer la consignation, à condition que vous ayez interjeté appel de l'ordonnance d'irrecevabilité.

Dois-je informer le tribunal de l'obtention de l'aide juridictionnelle ?

Normalement, le secrétaire du bureau d'aide juridictionnelle doit informer le greffe. Mais pour éviter tout problème, votre avocat peut également transmettre la décision.

Puis-je porter plainte sans payer de consignation si j'ai l'aide juridictionnelle ?

Oui, si vous bénéficiez de l'aide juridictionnelle, vous êtes dispensé de consignation dès le départ. Présentez votre décision d'aide au juge d'instruction.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 22-80.893
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 13 septembre 2022

Mots-clés

aide juridictionnelleconsignationplainte avec constitution de partie civileirrecevabilitéCour de cassation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord owner victim of fraud

Mr Dupont, owner of a flat in Plaisir, was defrauded by his tenant. He files a complaint with a civil party application. The judge sets a deposit of 300 euros. Mr Dupont, with modest income, cannot pay.

Application pratique:

Mr Dupont must immediately apply for legal aid. Even if the deposit deadline has passed, he must appeal the inadmissibility order within 10 days. Once aid is obtained, the deposit is annulled. He can pursue his action.

2

Tenant victim of unhealthy housing

Mrs Martin, tenant in Poissy, suffers from unhealthy housing. She files a complaint. The judge sets a deposit of 200 euros. She only has RSA (income support).

Application pratique:

She must apply for legal aid. If she obtains it before the investigating chamber rules on her appeal, the deposit is lifted. She can thus obtain redress without advancing any money.

3

Co-owner abused by management company

Mr Leroy, co-owner in Versailles, discovers that the management company has misappropriated funds. He files a complaint. The judge sets a deposit of 500 euros.

Application pratique:

Mr Leroy must apply for legal aid. Even if the deposit deadline has passed, he appeals. The aid obtained regularises his situation. He may recover the misappropriated funds without having to pay the deposit.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide