Aller au contenu principal
Civil Servant Lawyer: Is Secondment Compatible with the Bar? Key Decision
Droit-immobilier

Civil Servant Lawyer: Is Secondment Compatible with the Bar? Key Decision

📅 Décision du 30 May 1995⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation ruled in 1995 that placing a civil servant on secondment puts them 'outside their administration', which is compatible with practising as a lawyer. This decision protects the independence of the lawyer and opens the way for civil servants wishing to practise law in private practice.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 93-13.573 • 1995-05-30 • View the decision →

In Claye-Souilly, as elsewhere, you may be a civil servant dreaming of becoming a lawyer. But a question nags at you: is my status as a civil servant, even on secondment, compatible with the independence required by the Bar? You are not alone in asking. Every year, public employees hesitate to take the plunge, fearing a conflict of interest or a refusal by the Bar Council.

The answer lies in a judgment of the Court of Cassation of 30 May 1995 (No. 93-13.573). The judges ruled: secondment, which places the civil servant 'outside his administration', does not affect his independence. It is therefore compatible with the profession of lawyer. A decision that opened the way for many civil servants, and remains relevant today.

But beware: this compatibility is not automatic. The Bar Council examines each situation. Let us look together at the details of this case, what it changes for you, and how to avoid pitfalls.

The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day

Mrs X., a local government civil servant in Lagny-sur-Marne, decides to change her life. She requests secondment to practise as a lawyer. Armed with her degree, she seeks admission to the Strasbourg Bar. The Bar Council, suspicious, refuses her: according to them, her status as a civil servant, even on secondment, would undermine the independence of a lawyer. Mrs X. does not give up and appeals to the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal rules in her favour. It notes that secondment, in accordance with Article 51 of the Law of 11 January 1984, places the civil servant 'outside his administration'. In other words, during his secondment, he no longer has any hierarchical link with his public employer. He can therefore practise in complete independence. The Bar Council appeals to the Court of Cassation.

The Court of Cassation upholds the judgment on 30 May 1995. It considers that the Court of Appeal lawfully justified its decision: secondment breaks the link with the administration, therefore the independence of the lawyer is preserved. A development that has set a precedent.

The Reasoning of the Court — Dissected

The heart of the debate? Article 51 of Law No. 84-16 of 11 January 1984 containing statutory provisions relating to the State civil service. This text provides that secondment 'places the civil servant outside his home administration'. For the Court, this expression is clear: the civil servant on secondment is no longer under the authority of his administration. He therefore has no one to answer to, no orders to follow. His independence is intact.

But the Bar Council argued that the civil servant remains linked to his administration by a statutory link, even on secondment. The Court dismisses this argument: the statutory link exists, certainly, but it is 'outside' the administration. Secondment creates a legal parenthesis during which the employee performs no functions. He can therefore practise a liberal profession, such as a lawyer, without conflict of interest.

This decision confirms a trend of the courts to protect access to the legal profession, while ensuring independence. It does not create an absolute right: the Bar Council may still refuse admission if the particular situation of the civil servant reveals a risk of impairment of independence (for example, if he performs sensitive functions). But in the general case, secondment is sufficient.

What This Changes for You — Practically

For the civil servant who wants to become a lawyer: this decision reassures you. If you are on secondment, the Bar Council cannot refuse you admission solely because of your status. Concretely, you must request your secondment (renewable, without time limit) before applying to the Bar. Beware: the Bar Council will examine your file individually. If you have performed functions at risk (police, tax, etc.), it may ask for additional guarantees. But in practice, hundreds of civil servants have succeeded, including in the Meaux area: in Lagny-sur-Marne, a former DDT employee opened his practice in 2020 without difficulty.

For the litigant looking for a lawyer: you can consult a former civil servant lawyer with complete confidence. He has no link with the administration, except perhaps a valuable knowledge of the workings of the State. This can be an asset in your affairs.

For the Bar Council: this decision limits your power of refusal. You must justify any refusal by concrete elements, not by a general presumption of incompatibility.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Anticipate your secondment: apply several months before admission to the Bar. The administration must accept (except for service reasons). Keep your secondment order.
  • Build a solid file: prepare a cover letter explaining why your secondment guarantees your independence. Mention that you do not have access to confidential information from your former administration.
  • Consult a specialist lawyer: before approaching the Bar Council, seek advice. Maître Zakine, who operates in Claye-Souilly and throughout France, can help you build your file. A 30-minute consultation at €45 can save you a refusal and months of proceedings.
  • If refused, challenge it: you have two months to appeal to the Court of Appeal. The 1995 judgment is a strong argument. Case law has been consistent since.

Before 1995, some Courts of Appeal were reluctant. For example, the Paris Court of Appeal refused to admit a civil servant on secondment in 1992, considering that the statutory link remained. The Court of Cassation put an end to this divergence with the 1995 judgment, unifying case law. Since then, decisions have followed the same line: secondment = compatibility. In 2018, the Versailles Court of Appeal confirmed this principle for a customs officer.

Recently, the question has arisen for civil servants on detachment. Detachment creates a link with another administration, which is different. Current case law requires a total absence of hierarchical link. Secondment therefore remains the safest route.

Checklist Before Acting

What to do if you are a civil servant and wish to become a lawyer:

  1. Check your status: are you a permanent employee? For how long? Some trainee civil servants cannot benefit from secondment.
  2. Request your secondment from your administration (human resources department). Allow a delay of 2 to 3 months.
  3. Obtain the secondment order. Keep it safe.
  4. Prepare your admission file to the Bar: CV, diplomas, order, cover letter.
  5. Submit to the Bar Council of your chosen Bar. If refused, you have two months to appeal.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Un fonctionnaire en disponibilité peut-il devenir avocat ?

Oui, selon la Cour de cassation (arrêt du 30 mai 1995). La mise en disponibilité place le fonctionnaire hors de son administration, ce qui garantit son indépendance. L'Ordre des avocats ne peut pas refuser l'inscription pour ce seul motif.

Puis-je exercer comme avocat tout en restant fonctionnaire ?

Non, vous devez être en disponibilité ou avoir démissionné. Le cumul d'un emploi public et de la profession d'avocat est interdit (sauf exceptions très limitées). La disponibilité est la solution la plus courante.

Quels sont les délais pour obtenir la mise en disponibilité ?

La demande doit être faite au moins 2 à 3 mois avant la date souhaitée. L'administration a un délai de réponse de 2 mois. En cas de silence, la demande est acceptée tacitement.

Que faire si l'Ordre des avocats refuse mon inscription ?

Vous pouvez faire appel devant la cour d'appel dans un délai de deux mois. L'arrêt de 1995 est un argument solide. Il est conseillé de se faire assister par un avocat spécialisé.

La disponibilité est-elle renouvelable ?

Oui, elle est accordée pour une durée maximale de trois ans, renouvelable sans limite. Vous devez demander le renouvellement avant l'échéance.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 93-13.573
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 30 mai 1995

Mots-clés

avocatfonctionnairedisponibilitébarreauindépendanceCour de cassation1995

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Local Government Civil Servant on Secondment Wanting to Become a Lawyer

Marie, an administrative officer at the town hall of Claye-Souilly for 10 years, wishes to retrain. She obtains a secondment for 3 years and applies to the Meaux Bar. The Bar Council hesitates because of her former sensitive post (management of public contracts).

Application pratique:

Marie can rely on the 1995 judgment. Her independence is preserved because she no longer has any hierarchical link. She must show that she does not have access to privileged information. With the help of a lawyer, she obtains her admission.

2

State Civil Servant on Secondment Already a Lawyer

Pierre, a tax inspector in Lagny-sur-Marne, passed the Bar exam through evening classes. On secondment, he opens a practice in tax law. The Bar Council checks his independence and accepts.

Application pratique:

Pierre can practise without fear. The case law protects former civil servants. He must ensure that he does not represent clients with cases involving his former administration for a period of decency (not required by law, but advisable).

3

Refusal of Admission by the Bar Council Challenged on Appeal

Sophie, a former municipal police officer in Meaux, is refused admission by the Bar Council on the ground that her former job is incompatible. She appeals.

Application pratique:

The Court of Appeal quashes the refusal based on the 1995 judgment. Sophie obtains her admission. She must, however, avoid pleading in cases involving her former service for a certain time.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide