Reference decision: cc • N° 08-13.834 • 2009-10-07 • Consult the decision →
This decision provides important insight into your property rights. Here's what it changes for you.
The situation
Having found that the owner of a plot bordering a river had, after initial flooding, removed the riparian vegetation but only undertook to replant the bank belatedly with species that were not recommended by the Departmental Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry given their shallow rooting, the Court of Appeal was able to deduce that the change in the river's course following further flooding was due to a lack of maintenance of the banks by the riparian owner and that this owner, who had not complied with the provisions of Article L. 215-14 of the Environmental Code, was bound to restore the site and to compensate the owners of a micro hydroelectric plant for the loss resulting from the lack of water supply.
What the law says
This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.
Key points
- Strictly observe the legal deadlines for appeals
- Keep all supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, letters)
- Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation
For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.
📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes |
→ Browse all our legal articles

