Aller au contenu principal
Commercial Lease: No Right of Pre-emption for a Unit Sold as Part of a Larger Property
Droit-immobilier

Commercial Lease: No Right of Pre-emption for a Unit Sold as Part of a Larger Property

📅 Décision du 19 June 2025⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 vues📖 5 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that a commercial tenant cannot exercise a right of pre-emption when the unit it occupies is only part of a property sold as a whole. This ruling clarifies the rules for landlords and tenants.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 23-19.292 • 2025-06-19

You are the owner of a commercial property in Mérignac and wish to sell the entire building, but one of your tenants claims a right of pre-emption to buy only its unit. What should you do? This situation, more common than one might think, has just been decided by the Court of Cassation in a judgment of 19 June 2025. The High Court has ruled that the commercial tenant's right of pre-emption does not apply when the sale concerns a larger property than the leased unit alone. This decision secures global sales, but it deserves close analysis.

The Facts: A Common Story

Imagine: a company, which we will call "Assistance et gestion intégrale", has been a tenant since 1994 of a commercial unit within a property complex in Bordeaux. The lease was renewed in 2011. The landlord, an investor, decides to sell all the units in the building – i.e., several commercial units – to a single buyer. The tenant, considering that this sale gives it a right of pre-emption to buy its own unit, sues the seller and the buyer. It seeks annulment of the sale and damages. The Commercial Court of Bordeaux rules in its favour at first instance: the judge considers that the single sale of several separate units constitutes a single sale within the meaning of Article L. 145-46-1 of the Commercial Code, giving rise to a right of pre-emption. But the Bordeaux Court of Appeal reverses this judgment. The tenant appeals to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation dismisses the appeal and upholds the Court of Appeal's decision: no right of pre-emption when the leased unit is only part of the property sold.

The Reasoning of the Court — Explained

Article L. 145-46-1 of the Commercial Code provides that the tenant of a commercial lease benefits from a right of pre-emption in the event of a sale of the leased unit. But what happens if the landlord sells several units at once? The Court of Cassation answers: the right of pre-emption only applies if the sale concerns exclusively the leased unit. If the sale concerns a larger property, even if the leased unit is part of it, the tenant cannot demand priority. In other words, the seller is not obliged to split the sale to satisfy a tenant. The Court relies on a strict interpretation of the law: the right of pre-emption is an exception to the principle of free disposal of property, and it must not be extended. It dismisses the tenant's argument that the single sale of several separate units constitutes a "single sale" giving rise to a right of pre-emption. No, replies the Court: what matters is that the property sold is not the same as the leased property. The decision is clear: the tenant cannot "carve up" the sale to appropriate a part.

What This Changes for You — Practically

For a landlord in Bordeaux: you can sell your entire building without fear that a commercial tenant will block the sale by claiming a right of pre-emption over its sole unit. Example: you own a 500 m² building in Mérignac, with three commercial units leased to three different brands. You find an investor who wants to buy everything. None of the three tenants can demand to buy their unit separately. For a commercial tenant: be vigilant. If you are located in a larger property, you will not be able to exercise your right of pre-emption in the event of a global sale. However, if the landlord sells only your unit (for example, a condominium lot), then the right of pre-emption applies. For a buyer: this decision secures your purchase. You need not fear an action to annul the sale from a dissatisfied tenant. However, check that the sale indeed concerns a property and not the leased unit alone.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Precisely draft the subject of the sale: in the sale deed, clearly describe the entire property sold (plot, building, lots) to avoid any dispute over the scope.
  • Inform your tenants in writing: even if the right of pre-emption does not apply, a registered letter explaining the global sale can prevent litigation. Keep proof of sending.
  • Check your leases: some lease contracts contain a contractual right of pre-emption clause that is broader than the law. Review your leases to see if a specific clause imposes an obligation on you.
  • Consult a lawyer before the sale: a property law professional in Bordeaux or Mérignac can analyse the configuration of the premises (single unit or property) and save you from costly litigation.

This decision is in line with a consistent line of the Court of Cassation. Already, in a judgment of 13 February 2019 (No. 17-28.652), the Court had ruled that the right of pre-emption does not apply in the case of a sale of a building comprising several lots, even if the tenant occupies one of them. More recently, in 2022, a judgment of the Commercial Chamber specified that the sale of a commercial property, even if it includes leased units, escapes the right of pre-emption. The trend is therefore clear: the courts protect the freedom to sell properties, to the detriment of tenants who hoped for a priority purchase right. In the future, one can expect landlords to structure their sales in "blocks" to avoid any risk, while tenants will try to obtain contractual pre-emption clauses.

Summary and Next Steps

FAQ:

  • Can I sell my entire building if a commercial tenant wants to buy its unit? Yes, the Court of Cassation confirms this: no right of pre-emption for the tenant if the sale concerns a larger property.
  • What should I do if my tenant sues me for breach of the right of pre-emption? You can rely on the judgment of 19 June 2025 to show that the right does not apply. Consult a lawyer promptly.
  • Are there exceptions? Yes, if the lease contains a contractual pre-emption clause, or if the sale concerns exclusively the leased unit (e.g., sale of a single lot).
  • What is the time limit to challenge the sale? The tenant has 2 years from the sale to contest. After this period, the claim is time-barred.
  • Must I notify the sale to my tenant? The law does not require it in the case of a global sale, but it is good practice to avoid litigation.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je vendre mon immeuble entier si un locataire commercial veut acheter son local ?

Oui, la Cour de cassation le confirme : pas de droit de préférence pour le locataire si la vente porte sur un ensemble plus vaste.

Que faire si mon locataire m'assigne en justice pour non-respect du droit de préférence ?

Vous pouvez invoquer l'arrêt du 19 juin 2025 pour démontrer que le droit ne s'applique pas. Consultez un avocat rapidement.

Y a-t-il des exceptions ?

Oui, si le bail contient une clause de préférence conventionnelle, ou si la vente porte exclusivement sur le local loué (par exemple, vente d'un lot unique).

Quel est le délai pour agir en nullité de la vente ?

Le locataire dispose de 2 ans à compter de la vente pour contester. Passé ce délai, l'action est prescrite.

Dois-je notifier la vente à mon locataire ?

La loi ne l'exige pas en cas de vente globale, mais c'est une bonne pratique pour éviter un contentieux.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 23-19.292
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 19 juin 2025

Mots-clés

bail commercialdroit de préférencevente immeubleCour de cassationMérignacBordeaux

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Owner of a commercial property in Mérignac

You own a 300 m² building with 4 commercial units leased. You want to sell the entire property to an investor. A tenant, who rents 50 m², claims to have a right of pre-emption to buy its unit alone.

Application pratique:

Thanks to this judgment, you can sell the entire property without fear of an action for annulment. You only need to prove that the sale concerns the whole building, not just the unit. Draft the sale deed accordingly and inform the tenants by registered letter.

2

Commercial tenant in Bordeaux

You lease an 80 m² unit in a 500 m² building owned by a single landlord. The landlord sells the entire building. You wanted to buy your unit, but the seller refuses.

Application pratique:

You cannot rely on the statutory right of pre-emption. Check your lease: if a contractual pre-emption clause exists, it may protect you. Otherwise, you will have to negotiate with the new buyer to remain as a tenant.

3

Buyer of a building in Bordeaux

You are buying a 600 m² building comprising 5 commercial units. One of the tenants sues you for annulment of the sale, claiming that its right of pre-emption was violated.

Application pratique:

You can defend yourself by relying on the judgment of 19 June 2025. The sale concerns a property, not just the leased unit. Keep the sale deed describing the entire building. If the tenant persists, consult a lawyer for a solid defence.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide