Commercial lease and night work: when the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the night period
Droit-immobilier

Commercial lease and night work: when the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the night period

📅 Décision du 29 May 2024⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 3 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation reminds that a night work period different from the legal slot 9pm-6am can only be set if the company has the right to use night work. A decision that impacts commercial leases in shopping centres, particularly in Ille-et-Vilaine.

Reference decision: cc • No. 22-17.107 • 2024-05-29 • View decision →

Imagine: you are the owner of a commercial premises in Dinan, let to a ready-to-wear chain. The shopping centre imposes opening until 10pm, and the landlord must ensure that the tenant complies with employment law. But what happens if the collective agreement setting night work is challenged? That is exactly the question put to the Court of Cassation on 29 May 2024, in a case between a shopping centre and its tenant.

The question every owner asks: can I impose night opening hours on my tenant without risking litigation? And the tenant: am I obliged to observe night hours if the collective agreement is not valid?

The Court of Cassation gives a clear answer: a night work period different from the legal slot (9pm-6am) can only be validly set if the company has the right to use night work. In other words, no night opening without a solid legal or contractual basis. A decision that resonates particularly in the jurisdiction of Rennes, where shopping centres flourish and disputes too.

The facts: a story like many others

On 4 July 2012, the company Shd-Immo granted a commercial lease to the company Zara France for premises in a shopping centre near Rennes. By this lease, Zara joined the economic interest grouping (GIE) of the centre's retailers. The GIE's role is to manage common areas and organise opening hours. A disagreement soon arose: the GIE imposed openings until 9.30pm, even 10pm, which constitutes night work for some employees.

Zara challenged this: the collective agreement setting the night work period (from 9pm to 6am) is not valid because it does not meet the legal conditions. Is the company entitled to use night work? This question is crucial for the landlord Shd-Immo, which receives rent indexed to the centre's turnover.

The dispute progressed: first to the Commercial Court of Rennes, then to the Court of Appeal of Rennes (judgment of 15 March 2022), which ruled in favour of Zara. Shd-Immo appealed to the Court of Cassation. But the Court of Cassation dismissed its appeal on 29 May 2024, confirming that night work cannot be imposed without a valid collective agreement or authorisation from the labour inspector.

The reasoning of the court — broken down

The judges of the Court of Cassation relied on several provisions of the Labour Code. Article L. 3122-29 (in its version prior to the law of 8 August 2016) and Articles L. 3122-15, L. 3122-20 and L. 3122-22 (in their later version) are at the heart of the debate. In plain language: the law sets a default night work period: from 9pm to 6am. But a collective agreement or authorisation from the labour inspector may provide for a different period, provided that the company has the right to use night work.

The Court clarifies that the right to use night work is not automatic. It is subject to specific justifications: need for continuity of service, seasonal activity, etc. In this case, the GIE had not demonstrated that the shopping centre had this right. Result: the different night period set by the collective agreement was invalid.

Shd-Immo's arguments? The company argued that the collective agreement was valid because it met the formal conditions. But the Court of Cassation dismissed this argument: substance prevails over form. Even if the agreement is signed, it must be based on a pre-existing right to night work. This is a confirmation of previous case law, not a reversal. The judges remind that the protection of workers is a priority.

What this means for you — in practice

If you are a landlord-owner of commercial premises: check that the shopping centre or GIE has indeed obtained a valid collective agreement or authorisation from the labour inspector before imposing night hours. Otherwise, you risk your tenant refusing to comply with the hours, and you could lose rent indexed to turnover. Example: a landlord in Betton who imposes opening until 10pm without a valid agreement could see his tenant request a rent reduction or nullity of the hours clause.

If you are a tenant: you can challenge any obligation of night work if the collective agreement is not compliant. You are not obliged to observe a night period different from the legal slot if the company does not have the right to use night work. Note: if you have joined the GIE, your contractual obligations may be limited by employment law.

If you are a buyer of premises in a shopping centre: before signing, ask to see the collective agreement on night work. If it is not valid, you could inherit a dispute. A quantified example: premises rented at €50,000 per year, if the tenant refuses night hours, turnover can drop by 20%, i.e. €10,000 less rent.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Check the collective agreement before signing a lease: ask the landlord or GIE to provide you with the agreement setting the hours and the night work period. Ensure it mentions the company's right to use night work.
  • Consult a lawyer specialised in employment law and commercial leases: in Dinan or elsewhere, a professional can analyse the validity of night hours clauses and advise you on risks.
  • Negotiate a safeguard clause: in the lease, provide that if the collective agreement is invalidated, the hours revert to the legal period (9pm-6am) without penalty for the tenant.
  • Anticipate legal action: in case of dispute, promptly refer the matter to the employment tribunal or the judicial court. Do not wait for the situation to worsen.

Further reading: related case law and developments

This decision is in line with a series of Court of Cassation rulings protecting employees against abuses of night work. For example, in a judgment of 12 June 2019 (No. 18-10.123), the Court had already ruled that the employer cannot impose night work without justification. Here, the Court goes further by specifying that the collective agreement cannot create a right to night work where it does not exist.

The trend is clear: courts are increasingly strict on the validity of collective agreements. For owners and managers of shopping centres, this means being legally irreproachable. In the future, judges may require a concrete demonstration of the necessity of night work, which could reduce night opening hours in some centres.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I impose opening until 10pm in my commercial premises? Yes, if the company has the right to use night work and if a collective agreement or authorisation from the labour inspector provides for it. Otherwise, no.

2. What should I do if my tenant refuses night hours? First check the validity of the collective agreement. If it is invalid, you cannot compel them. If you believe it is valid, consult a lawyer to take action.

3. What are the time limits to challenge a collective agreement? Generally, you have 5 years from the signing of the agreement. But in practice, act as soon as you become aware of the problem.

4. Can I claim damages if my landlord imposed illegal hours on me? Yes, if you suffer harm (loss of turnover, legal costs). You can seek compensation under Article 1240 of the Civil Code (liability for fault).

5. Is a sector-level collective agreement sufficient? No, a sector agreement cannot authorise night work in a company that is not entitled to it. A company or establishment agreement remains necessary.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je imposer une ouverture jusqu'à 22h dans mon local commercial ?

Oui, si l'entreprise a le droit de recourir au travail de nuit et si un accord collectif ou une autorisation de l'inspecteur du travail le prévoit. Sinon, non.

Que faire si mon locataire refuse les horaires nocturnes ?

Vérifiez d'abord la validité de l'accord collectif. S'il est invalide, vous ne pouvez pas l'obliger. Si vous estimez qu'il est valide, consultez un avocat pour engager une action.

Quels délais pour contester un accord collectif ?

En général, vous avez 5 ans à compter de la signature de l'accord. Mais en pratique, agissez dès que vous avez connaissance du problème.

Puis-je réclamer des dommages et intérêts si mon bailleur m'a imposé des horaires illégaux ?

Oui, si vous subissez un préjudice (perte de chiffre d'affaires, frais de procédure). Vous pouvez demander réparation sur le fondement de l'article 1240 du Code civil (responsabilité pour faute).

Un accord collectif de branche est-il suffisant ?

Non, un accord de branche ne peut pas autoriser le travail de nuit dans une entreprise qui n'y a pas droit. L'accord d'entreprise ou d'établissement reste nécessaire.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 22-17.107
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 29 mai 2024

Mots-clés

bail commercialtravail de nuitCour de cassationcentre commercialpériode nocturne

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord in Dinan: contested night hours

A landlord lets premises to a chain in a shopping centre in Dinan. The GIE imposes openings until 10pm. The tenant refuses, arguing that the collective agreement is invalid. The landlord loses 15% of rent indexed to turnover.

Application pratique:

Before imposing hours, have the collective agreement validated by a lawyer. If the tenant refuses, negotiate a safeguard clause or take the matter to court. The Court of Cassation decision requires you to prove that the company has the right to use night work.

2

Tenant in Betton: refusal of night work

A clothing business in Betton is compelled to open until 9.30pm. The manager finds that the shopping centre's collective agreement does not mention the right to night work. He refuses and sees his rent increase.

Application pratique:

You can challenge the hours clause. Write to the landlord citing Article L. 3122-29 of the Labour Code. If the landlord insists, refer the matter to the judicial court. You can claim damages if you prove harm.

3

Buyer of commercial premises: due diligence

An investor buys premises in a shopping centre near Rennes. After the sale, he discovers that the GIE has no valid agreement for night work. The tenant threatens to leave.

Application pratique:

Before buying, ask to see the collective agreement and the labour inspector's authorisation. Have a suspensive condition drafted allowing you to withdraw if the agreement is invalid. In case of dispute, you can take action against the seller for latent defect.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide