Aller au contenu principal
3-Year Derogatory Lease: Beware of Cumulative Durations Since 2014
Droit-immobilier

3-Year Derogatory Lease: Beware of Cumulative Durations Since 2014

📅 Décision du 22 October 2020⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The French Supreme Court reminds that since the law of 18 June 2014, the total duration of successive derogatory leases for the same business in the same premises cannot exceed three years from the first lease, even if the tenant has waived the commercial lease status at each renewal.

Reference Decision: cc • N° 19-20.443 • 2020-10-22 • View the decision →

Picture the scene: in Tarnos, in the commercial zone of Porte des Landes, a hair salon manager has been operating his premises for nearly four years. His initial lease was a 23-month derogatory lease, renewed once. At the end of the second lease, the landlord offers him a new 12-month seasonal lease. The trader accepts, thinking he is doing the right thing. But here's the catch: the law does not allow more than three years of cumulative derogatory leases for the same premises and the same business. This decision of the French Supreme Court of 22 October 2020 forcefully reminds us of this.

What question does every owner of commercial premises in the Landes ask? "Can I multiply derogatory leases to avoid the protective status of commercial leases?" The answer is no, since the Pinel Law of 18 June 2014. And the French Supreme Court has just locked the system: it does not matter that the tenant waived the status each time; the total duration cannot exceed three years.

In this article, I will explain simply what this decision changes for you, whether you are a landlord in Saint-Vincent-de-Tyrosse or a trader in Mont-de-Marsan. We will look at the facts, the judges' reasoning, and above all the practical consequences to avoid falling into the trap.

The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day

Mr X, owner of commercial premises in Tarnos, rents his property to a hairdresser since 2015. The first derogatory lease (a short-term lease that escapes the commercial lease status) is signed for 23 months. Upon expiry in 2017, a second 23-month derogatory lease is concluded, with the tenant expressly waiving the protective status. In 2019, the landlord proposes a third 12-month derogatory lease. The tenant refuses and claims the application of the commercial lease status, which would give him a right to renewal and a capped rent.

The landlord brings the case before the High Court of Mont-de-Marsan, seeking the tenant's eviction. He is unsuccessful: the judge considers that the cumulative duration of the three leases (23 + 23 + 12 = 58 months, nearly 5 years) exceeds the permitted three years. The landlord appeals, then appeals to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court confirms: since the law of 18 June 2014, the total duration of successive derogatory leases for the same business in the same premises cannot exceed three years from the effective date of the first lease. In short, it does not matter that the tenant waived each time: the clock starts ticking from the beginning.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The French Supreme Court relies on Article L. 145-5 of the Commercial Code, resulting from the 2014 Pinel Law. This text allows parties to derogate from the commercial lease status for a maximum period of three years. But beware: the accumulation of several derogatory leases must not exceed this duration. The reasoning is simple: the law intended to limit the precariousness of traders. If one could indefinitely chain derogatory leases, the protective status would be circumvented.

In this case, the landlord argued that each waiver of status (a clause by which the tenant agrees not to benefit from the status) was valid and that the clock should reset. But the Court rejects this argument: the waiver cannot have the effect of extending the maximum three-year period. In other words, the three-year period runs continuously from the first lease, regardless of successive waivers.

What few people know is that this interpretation is a confirmation of earlier case law, but with reinforced scope. Before 2014, parties could conclude as many derogatory leases as they wished. The law changed the game. The judges remind that the objective is to protect the trader, as the weaker party, against landlords who would keep them in a precarious situation.

What This Changes for You — Practically

For landlord lessors: if you signed a first derogatory lease in 2021, you will no longer be able to propose a second after 2024 without the tenant being able to claim the status. Example: in Saint-Vincent-de-Tyrosse, a landlord rents premises at €800/month under a two-year derogatory lease. If he renews once for one year, the clock reaches three years. Upon expiry, the tenant can demand a commercial lease and the rent will be capped according to the Commercial Rent Index (ILC), potentially a reduction if the market has fallen.

For tenants: if you have occupied premises for more than three years under several derogatory leases, you can demand the commercial lease status. However, beware: you must act quickly, as the right to renewal is subject to a two-year limitation period from the expiry of the lease.

undefined, I have encountered cases where traders in Mont-de-Marsan had signed four seasonal leases of 6 months each. The Supreme Court would say that the cumulative duration of 24 months is less than three years, so it is valid. But beware: if you exceed three years, the status applies automatically, even if the tenant signed waivers.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Do not accumulate more than three years of derogatory leases for the same premises and the same business. From the first lease, set yourself a maximum limit of three years, including renewals.
  • Have an express and informed waiver clause drafted for each new lease, even if its effectiveness is limited by the decision. It may be useful in case of dispute over the duration.
  • Prefer a short-term commercial lease (1 to 3 years) if you want to avoid the status for a long time. But know that upon expiry, the tenant will have the right to renewal.
  • Consult a lawyer lawyer before signing a derogatory lease, especially if you have already had a previous lease with the same tenant. A simple check can avoid costly litigation.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

This decision is part of a consistent line. The French Supreme Court had already ruled (Cass. 3rd Civ., 22 March 2018, No. 16-28.380) that the three-year period runs from the effective date of the first lease, without the possibility of renewing it by a new waiver. Another decision (Cass. 3rd Civ., 11 July 2019, No. 18-17.489) specified that the waiver of status must be express and unambiguous. The trend is clear: judges protect the trader against schemes aimed at circumventing the status.

For the future, we can expect the Court to continue to sanction any exceeding of the three-year duration, even in case of apparent agreement between the parties. The message is clear: the commercial lease status is a matter of public policy; one can only derogate from it within the strict limits provided by law.

Summary and Next Steps

FAQ

Q: Can I sign a 23-month derogatory lease, then another 23-month one for the same premises?
A: No, the cumulative duration would be 46 months, i.e., more than three years. Upon expiry of the first lease, the second derogatory lease cannot exceed 13 months (36 - 23).

Q: What should I do if I have already exceeded the three years of derogatory leases?
A: The tenant can claim the commercial lease status. You must then offer them a commercial lease or initiate eviction proceedings, but beware: the judge could reclassify the relationship as a commercial lease with retroactive effect.

Q: Is the waiver of status useless?
A: Not entirely. It can be useful to demonstrate the parties' intention, but it does not allow exceeding the three years. It remains recommended for short-term leases.

Q: What are the time limits for action?
A: The tenant has two years from the expiry of the last lease to request renewal. After this period, they lose their right.

Q: Can I conclude a derogatory lease with a legal person (SARL, SAS)?
A: Yes, the same rules apply. Beware of the cumulative duration.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, lawyer in French real estate law, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial & droit immobilier  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je signer deux baux dérogatoires de 23 mois pour le même local ?

Non, la durée cumulée de 46 mois dépasse les trois ans autorisés. Le second bail dérogatoire ne peut excéder 13 mois.

Que faire si mon propriétaire me propose un troisième bail dérogatoire après deux déjà conclus ?

Vous pouvez refuser et réclamer l'application du statut des baux commerciaux, car la durée de trois ans est dépassée.

La renonciation au statut signée à chaque bail est-elle valable ?

Oui, mais elle ne permet pas de prolonger la durée maximale de trois ans. Le délai court dès le premier bail.

Quels sont les délais pour demander le statut des baux commerciaux ?

Vous avez deux ans à compter de l'expiration du dernier bail pour demander le renouvellement.

Cette règle s'applique-t-elle aux baux conclus avant 2014 ?

Non, la loi du 18 juin 2014 s'applique aux baux conclus à compter du 1er septembre 2014.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 19-20.443
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 22 octobre 2020

Mots-clés

bail dérogatoiredurée cumuléestatut des baux commerciauxCour de cassationloi Pinel

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord in Tarnos: Derogatory Lease Renewed Twice

Mr X, owner of commercial premises in Tarnos, signed a first 23-month derogatory lease with a hairdresser, renewed once for 23 months, then a third for 12 months. The tenant refuses and claims the status.

Application pratique:

Thanks to this decision, the judge considers that the cumulative duration of 58 months exceeds three years. The landlord must offer a commercial lease or negotiate a departure.

2

Tenant in Saint-Vincent-de-Tyrosse: Under Derogatory Lease for 3 Years

A trader has occupied premises for 3 years under two successive 18-month derogatory leases. He wishes to stay on the same terms.

Application pratique:

He can demand the commercial lease status and a new 9-year lease. The rent will be capped according to the ILC.

3

Buyer of a Business in Mont-de-Marsan: Check Previous Leases

An entrepreneur buys a business and discovers that the seller signed several derogatory leases with the landlord.

Application pratique:

If the cumulative duration exceeds three years, the new owner can demand the status. He must check the dates of the previous leases.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide