Lease granted to a minor: no right to renewal upon reaching majority

Imagine for a moment: you own a commercial property in Frontignan, near the Étang de Thau. In 1977, you sign a ten-year lease with a minor – the son of a local shopkeeper – who runs a small grocery store. Years pass, the child comes of age, the lease is tacitly renewed, and suddenly you want to recover your property. Can you do so without giving notice? The question every landlord asks: does a contract signed by a minor bind the adult he becomes? This decision of the Court of Cassation of 15 March 2000 provides a clear answer: no. And it is a revolution in the world of commercial leases.

But what exactly does this change for you, whether you are a landlord of a property in Sète or a tenant of a shop in Montpellier? In other words, if you signed a lease as a minor, or if you let to a minor, your rights and obligations are not the same. This decision protects the minor who has come of age against commitments made before majority, but it leaves the landlord in a delicate situation. How to react? Let's delve into the facts and the judges' reasoning.

In clear terms, the Court of Cassation held that a lease granted in the name of a minor confers on the tenant, against the minor who has become an adult, no right to renewal or to remain in the premises upon expiry of the lease, notwithstanding any contrary legal provisions. In other words, after the expiry of a fixed-term lease, the tenant could be evicted without the landlord being required to give notice. This is a strong decision which reminds us that the protection of minors prevails over the stability of commercial leases.

The facts: a story like many others

Mr. Allegrini, a landlord in Frontignan, granted a lease on 15 April 1977 for a period of ten years of plots of land to a minor – let's call him Paul – to operate a commercial complex. The lease is commercial but not subject to the statutory regime for commercial leases (law of 30 June 1926) because it is a short-term lease. Paul becomes an adult during the lease, and the lease continues tacitly. At the expiry of the initial lease (1987), the landlord wants to recover his land. Paul, now an adult, invokes the statutory regime for commercial leases to request renewal and challenges the eviction.

The dispute goes up to the Court of Cassation. Paul argues that the lease, even if signed by a minor, is subject to the statutory regime for commercial leases and that he has a right to renewal. The landlord retorts that since the minor lacked capacity to contract, the lease is void or unenforceable upon his majority, and therefore he can recover his property without notice. The Court of Appeal rules in Paul's favour, but the Court of Cassation quashes the judgment.

The twist: the High Court holds that a lease granted in the name of a minor produces no effect against him once he becomes an adult. Consequently, Paul cannot rely on the statutory regime for commercial leases to remain in the premises. He must leave at the expiry of the lease, with no right to renewal or to remain. The landlord can evict him without having to give notice. This is a victory for the landlord, but it raises practical questions.

The reasoning of the court — broken down

The Court of Cassation relies on a fundamental principle: a minor who is not emancipated is incapable of contracting, except for everyday acts (Article 1146 of the Civil Code, former). Now, a long-term commercial lease is not an everyday act. The contract is therefore void or, at the very least, unenforceable against the minor who has become an adult. The Court specifies that this principle prevails over the provisions of the statutory regime for commercial leases, even if the lease has been performed for years. In clear terms, the protection of the minor outweighs the stability of leases.

The judges reject Paul's argument that the lease, once performed, would be validated by his majority. The Court holds that the relative nullity of the contract (which protects the minor) can be invoked at any time by the minor, but also by the landlord if the minor seeks to derive a right from it. Note, however, that this is not an absolute nullity. The landlord cannot seek eviction before the expiry of the lease because the minor has performed the contract. But at expiry, the lease terminates automatically, without notice.

What few people know is that this decision is in line with consistent case law: acts entered into by a minor are voidable, unless expressly ratified after majority. Here, there was no ratification. Therefore, the landlord is not required to comply with the notice rules (six months' notice, etc.) provided for by the statutory regime for commercial leases. undefined, I have come across cases where leases were signed by emancipated minors or with parental authorisation. The situation is then different. But in this case, the minor was not emancipated.

What this changes for you — concretely

For the landlord: If you have let to a minor, you can recover your property at the expiry of the lease without giving notice. But beware: you must wait until the end of the initial lease. Example in Sète: you signed a 9-year lease with a minor in 2015. In 2024, the lease expires. You can seek eviction without notice. However, if the minor became an adult and continued to operate, you cannot evict him during the lease. The lease remains valid until its term.

For the tenant (minor become adult): You cannot demand renewal. If you want to stay, you must negotiate a new lease with the landlord. You have no right to remain in the premises. Example with figures: in Montpellier, a 9-year commercial lease signed at age 17. At age 26, the landlord refuses renewal. You must leave. No compensation for eviction.

For the purchaser of a business: Check whether the initial lease was signed by a minor. If so, the right to renewal is non-existent. This may affect the value of the business. Carry out thorough due diligence.

If you are in this situation, you must act quickly. As soon as the lease expires, the landlord can commence eviction proceedings. You have no recourse to stay. However, if the lease was tacitly renewed after majority, the situation may be different. Consult a lawyer.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Check the age and capacity of the co-contractor: Before signing a lease, ask for a copy of the ID. If the tenant is a minor, require that the contract be signed by the parents or a legal guardian, or wait until he comes of age.
• Have the lease ratified after majority: If you have signed with a minor, once he becomes an adult, have him sign a written confirmation of the lease. This will make it enforceable and secure your rights.
• Avoid short-term leases with minors: Short-term leases (less than 2 years) are often used to circumvent the statutory regime. But with a minor, the risk is even greater. Prefer a standard lease.
• Consult a lawyer before any action: If you are a landlord and want to evict, or if you are a tenant and want to stay, seek advice. A mistake can be costly (compensation, legal costs).

Further reading: related case law and developments

This decision is part of a line of cases protecting minors. For example, in a decision of 13 November 1996 (No. 94-18.067), the Court of Cassation had already held that a lease granted to a non-emancipated minor is void and cannot serve as a basis for a renewal claim. The 2000 decision confirms this approach. However, if the minor is emancipated, he can validly contract (Article 413-8 of the Civil Code).

Since 2000, the Court of Cassation has maintained this position. In a decision of 10 July 2013 (No. 12-21.152), it specified that express ratification after majority makes the lease enforceable. So, if you are a landlord, have it ratified. If you are a tenant, know that without ratification, you are vulnerable.

The trend is clear: the protection of minors prevails. But the courts are increasingly attentive to good faith and performance of the contract. undefined, I have seen cases where the judge granted a period to vacate the premises, but never a right to renewal.

Checklist before acting

• Q: Can I evict a tenant who was a minor at the time of signing the lease? A: Yes, at the expiry of the lease, without notice, provided that the initial lease was signed by the minor alone, without parental authorisation.
• Q: What if the lease was tacitly renewed after majority? A: Tacit renewal does not amount to ratification. You can still evict at the expiry of the initial lease, but if the lease was expressly renewed after majority, it becomes enforceable.
• Q: What are the time limits for action? A: As soon as the lease expires, the landlord can issue a summons for eviction. The tenant may request a period of grace (up to 2 years) but not renewal.
• Q: What is the cost of eviction proceedings? A: Expect between €1,500 and €3,000 for a simple procedure, plus bailiff's fees (around €500). If the tenant contests, costs can rise to €5,000.
• Q: Can I sell the property with such a lease? A: Yes, but the price will be affected because the tenant has no right to renewal. Mention this situation in the deed of sale.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →