Aller au contenu principal
Assignment of Professional Lease: Can the Landlord Restrict Your Freedom to Assign?
Droit-immobilier

Assignment of Professional Lease: Can the Landlord Restrict Your Freedom to Assign?

📅 Décision du 20 May 1981⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 10 vues📖 5 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation confirms that the landlord can, even with a maximum rent increase, prohibit the isolated assignment of the leasehold interest and require the assignment of all rights attached to the profession. A key clause for landlords and tenants.

Reference decision: cc • N° 79-14.797 • 1981-05-20 • View decision →

Imagine: you own a professional premises in Saint-Doulchard, let to a tradesman. You have agreed to a rent increase up to the statutory maximum. But now your tenant wants to assign his leasehold interest to a third party, without asking for your consent. Can you prohibit it? This 1981 decision of the Court of Cassation gives a clear answer: yes, provided the lease so provides. But what exactly does this change for you, landlord or tenant? Let's delve into the details.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mr Nougarède, tenant of premises used for professional purposes belonging to a landlord, wished to assign his leasehold interest alone, without the professional activity he carried on there. The lease contained a clause restricting assignment to the whole of the rights attached to the exercise of his profession. The landlord refused the isolated assignment. Nougarède brought proceedings, arguing that the maximum rent increase (provided for by law) entitled him to complete freedom of assignment. The Court of Appeal ruled against him, and the Court of Cassation confirmed this in 1981.

The reasoning of the court — broken down

The Court of Cassation relies on Article 1134 of the Civil Code (now Article 1103): agreements lawfully formed take the place of law for those who have made them. In other words, the lease is law between the parties. Here, the assignment clause was clear: it required the assignee to take over all the rights attached to the profession (goodwill, equipment, etc.). The tenant could not assign a bare "leasehold interest" without the activity. The Court rejects the tenant's argument that the rent increase (statutory cap) gave him an absolute right to assign freely. It recalls that the law does not prohibit the landlord from restricting assignment, even in the case of a maximum rent. In short, contractual freedom prevails over rent regulation.

What this means for you — practically

For landlords: you can insert a clause in the lease prohibiting the isolated assignment of the leasehold interest. Even if you have already applied a rent increase, this clause remains valid. However, it must be clearly drafted, e.g., "the tenant may assign his leasehold interest only together with all the rights attached to the exercise of his profession."

For tenants: if you are considering assigning your lease, check the clauses. If the lease requires a global assignment (goodwill + lease), you cannot assign the lease alone. In Aubigny-sur-Nère, a hairdresser wishing to sell his salon will have to include the lease in the sale, not assign it separately.

For purchasers: before buying a leasehold interest, ensure the lease authorises assignment. Otherwise, you risk the landlord's refusal.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Draft a precise assignment clause in the lease: state explicitly whether assignment is free, subject to approval, or limited to the assignment of the business. Example: "Any assignment of the leasehold interest is subject to the landlord's written consent, unless it occurs with the assignment of the entire craft business."
  • Keep a written record of exchanges: if you refuse an assignment, notify your refusal by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt, giving reasons for your decision.
  • Anticipate tax consequences: assignment of a leasehold interest may generate capital gains. Consult a chartered accountant.
  • Have your lease reviewed by a lawyer lawyer: Maître Zakine can check the compliance of your clauses with recent case law.

This 1981 decision was subsequently confirmed: the Court of Cassation held that even with a regulated rent, the landlord can restrict assignment (Civ. 3e, 12 March 1985, n°83-16.789). However, caution: if the clause is considered abusive (e.g., total prohibition without legitimate reason), it could be annulled. undefined, I have encountered cases where the tenant wanted to assign his lease to a direct competitor: the landlord can legitimately refuse to protect his premises. The trend of the courts is to respect the parties' intention, provided the clause is clear and not discriminatory.

What you absolutely must remember

FAQ:

  • Can I assign my leasehold interest if the lease says nothing? In principle, assignment is free, but the landlord may refuse if he has a serious reason (subject to any contrary clause).
  • Can the landlord prohibit any assignment? Yes, if the lease so provides. But a total prohibition without any possibility of assignment in the context of a sale of the business may be revised by the court.
  • What to do if the landlord abusively refuses? Apply to the judicial court for a court order authorising the assignment.
  • What is the time limit to challenge a refusal? You have 5 years from the refusal (general limitation period).

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) may save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je céder mon droit au bail si le bail ne dit rien ?

En principe, la cession est libre, mais le bailleur peut refuser s'il a un motif sérieux (ex : insolvabilité du cessionnaire). Sans clause, la loi autorise la cession.

Le bailleur peut-il interdire toute cession ?

Oui, si une clause du bail le prévoit. Mais une interdiction totale sans possibilité de cession dans le cadre d'une vente de fonds peut être contestée en justice.

Que faire si le bailleur refuse abusivement la cession ?

Vous pouvez saisir le tribunal judiciaire pour demander une autorisation judiciaire de cession. Le juge vérifiera le caractère abusif du refus.

Quel est le délai pour contester un refus de cession ?

Vous avez 5 ans à compter du refus (prescription de droit commun). Agissez rapidement pour éviter la prescription.

La majoration du loyer au maximum supprime-t-elle le droit du bailleur de limiter la cession ?

Non, selon cette décision de 1981. Même avec un loyer majoré, le bailleur peut valablement limiter la cession par une clause du bail.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 79-14.797
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 20 mai 1981

Mots-clés

cession de bailbail professionneldroit au bailbailleurlocataireclause de cessionCour de cassation1981

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Owner of professional premises in Saint-Doulchard

You let a workshop to a cabinetmaker. The lease provides that assignment can only be made with the entire craft business. The tenant wants to assign the lease alone to a friend. You refuse.

Application pratique:

The case law confirms your right to refuse the isolated assignment, even if the rent is at the statutory maximum. You must notify your refusal in writing with reasons.

2

Tenant of a medical practice in Aubigny-sur-Nère

You want to sell your patient list and assign the lease to the successor. But the lease contains a clause prohibiting assignment without the landlord's consent.

Application pratique:

You must obtain the landlord's written consent before assigning. If he refuses without legitimate reason, you can apply to the court.

3

Purchaser of a business in Bourges

You are buying a restaurant. The seller assigns you the business and the leasehold interest. But the landlord has not given his consent.

Application pratique:

Check before purchase whether the lease authorises assignment. Otherwise, the landlord may refuse your installation. Have a prior agreement signed.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide