Reference Decision: cc • N° 12-29.221 • 2014-01-21 • View the decision →
Imagine: you own a flat in Meylan, Isère, and you decide to buy the shares of a SCI (French property investment company) that owns a building. You sign a transfer deed, pay the price, and everything seems in order. Then, a few months later, a member challenges the sale and seeks annulment. Why? Because the transfer was not notified to the company and the other members, as required by law. This misfortune, experienced by many investors, was decided by the Court of Cassation in 2014.
The question every owner, whether in Voiron or elsewhere, asks is simple: "Am I really the owner of these shares if the procedure was not followed?" The answer, unsurprisingly, is nuanced. The law protects the existing members, to prevent an unwanted third party from entering the company without control.
The decision of 21 January 2014 (n° 12-29.221) of the Court of Cassation reminds a fundamental rule: to transfer shares of a SARL to a third party outside the company, the conditions of Article L. 223-14 of the French Commercial Code must be respected. If the notification is not made, the transfer can be annulled. Here is what to remember to avoid a dispute.
The facts: a story like many others
In this case, a SCI had two members, Mr X and Mrs Y. In 2005, Mr X decides to transfer his shares to a third party, Mr Z, an entrepreneur from Meylan. The transfer deed is signed on 30 December 2005. In June 2006, the articles of association of the SCI are amended to include Mr Z as a member and co-manager. Everything seems to be going normally, until Mrs Y, the other member, challenges the transfer.
Mrs Y brings proceedings to seek annulment of the transfer, arguing that Mr Z was never regularly approved (accepted) by the members. According to her, the notification procedure provided for by Article L. 223-14 was not followed: the transfer was not notified to the company or the members, and approval was not sought. The Court of Appeal dismisses her claim, holding that the amendment of the articles of association and the Kbis extract (official document certifying the legal existence of a company) were sufficient to prove the members' consent.
Mrs Y appeals to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation rules in her favour: the Court of Appeal did not verify whether notification had been made. Yet, without this formality, approval cannot be valid. The judgment is quashed (annulled) and the case remitted to another Court of Appeal.
The reasoning of the court — broken down
The Court of Cassation relies on Article L. 223-14 of the French Commercial Code, which governs the transfer of shares of a SARL. This provision requires that a transfer to a third party outside the company be notified to the company and to each member. Then, the members must decide on the approval of the transferee (the new owner of the shares). If approval is refused, the company must buy back the shares or have them bought back by another member.
In this case, the Court of Appeal had considered that the signing of the new articles of association by both members amounted to tacit approval. But the Court of Cassation reminds that approval can only be given if the transfer has been previously notified. Without notification, there is no legal basis to validate the transfer. The lower courts (first instance and appeal judges) should have established that notification had taken place.
This is not a reversal of case law: the Court of Cassation confirms a consistent rule. However, the decision is interesting because it emphasises that even a subsequent amendment of the articles of association cannot remedy the lack of notification. In other words, form prevails over substance. The judges insist on the protective nature of the procedure: it allows members to refuse the entry of a third party without having to justify their decision.
The decision was rendered by the Third Civil Chamber, specialised in property and land matters. This explains why the Court dealt with this dispute in a civil context, even though it concerns company shares. In practice, SCIs are often used to manage real estate, hence the link with property law.
What this means for you — concretely
If you are a member of a SARL or SCI, this decision reminds you that transferring your shares to a third party is not a trivial act. You must follow the notification procedure, otherwise the transfer may be annulled years later. For example, if you sell your shares to a friend without informing the other members, they can seek annulment, even if the price has been paid.
For a buyer, the lesson is clear: before buying shares, verify that the transfer has been notified and that approval has been obtained. Ask for a copy of the notification and the minutes of approval. Without these documents, you risk losing your shares and your investment. Imagine you buy shares of a SCI in Voiron for €50,000. If notification was not made, a member can obtain annulment: you get your money back, but after months of proceedings and legal fees.
For existing members, this decision is a protection. If a third party tries to enter without your consent, you can challenge. But beware: if you have tacitly accepted the transfer (for example, by signing the new articles of association), you may be deemed to have waived your right to act. It is therefore preferable to formalise your refusal in writing.
Finally, for property professionals (notaries, estate agents), this decision is a reminder: the transfer of company shares is not a simple sale. It requires specific formalities. A failure to notify can lead to annulment, even if the transfer has been duly registered.
Four tips to avoid this type of dispute
- Notify the transfer by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt: address it to the company and each member, specifying the number of shares transferred, the price and the identity of the transferee. Keep the acknowledgements of receipt.
- Obtain express approval from the members: hold a general meeting or obtain written consent. Do not rely on silence or a subsequent signature of the articles of association.
- Draft a detailed transfer deed: mention the date of notification, the date of approval, and attach supporting documents. Have it registered with the tax authorities.
- Consult a lawyer before any transfer: a professional will check the company's articles of association and any approval clauses. This will avoid costly annulments.
Further reading: related case law and developments
The Court of Cassation has rendered several decisions in the same vein. For example, in a decision of 12 November 2009 (n° 08-20.525), it held that the lack of notification rendered the transfer void, even if the transferee was subsequently approved. Similarly, in a decision of 15 May 2012 (n° 11-15.680), it specified that notification must be made before approval, not after.
The trend is therefore consistent: the judges are very strict on procedure. They consider that notification is a condition of validity, not a mere formality. This strictness aims to protect members against unwanted intrusions. In the future, the Court may further strengthen this requirement, for example by requiring individual notification to each member, even if the articles of association provide for collective notification.
For practitioners, it is essential to follow this case law. A poorly notified transfer is a time bomb: it can be challenged for five years (the limitation period in company law). It is better to spend a little time doing things properly than to risk annulment.
Summary and next steps
Here is a checklist of actions to take if you plan to transfer or buy shares of a SARL/SCI:
- Check the articles of association: read the approval clauses. Some companies impose special conditions (enhanced majority, response time).
- Notify the transfer: send a registered letter to the company and each member, with details of the transfer.
- Obtain approval: wait for the members' response. If they do not respond within 15 days (or the period provided by the articles of association), approval is deemed granted.
- Draft the final deed: once approval is obtained, sign the transfer deed and have it registered.
- Update the registers: amend the articles of association and the company's Kbis.
If in doubt, do not hesitate to consult a specialised lawyer. A property investment in Meylan or Voiron can quickly turn into a nightmare if formalities are neglected.
Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →
📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation |
→ Browse all our legal articles

