Aller au contenu principal
Suspensive Condition: When the Seller Withdraws Before Signing
Droit-immobilier

Suspensive Condition: When the Seller Withdraws Before Signing

📅 Décision du 11 April 1995⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 7 vues📖 6 min de lecture

Article 1175 of the Civil Code requires that suspensive conditions be performed in good faith. The Court of Cassation reminds that a seller cannot evade their obligations by invoking a condition that was not fulfilled due to their own actions.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 93-11.120 • 1995-04-11 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are the owner of a property in Mauguio, a small port in the Hérault. You are selling your property. The buyer obtains their loan, the suspensive condition is fulfilled. But you change your mind at the last moment. Can you terminate the sale without consequences? This question has crossed the mind of every owner or buyer at some point. The answer lies in Article 1175 of the Civil Code, a little-known but remarkably effective provision. The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 11 April 1995, ruled: a suspensive condition must be performed in the manner that the parties presumably intended. In short, you cannot play with fire.

This decision, No. 93-11.120, is a reference for all property professionals. It reminds us that good faith is paramount in the performance of contracts. But what exactly does this change for you, whether you are an owner or buyer in Sète, Montpellier, or elsewhere? Let us delve into the facts.

The story begins with a promise to sell shares, subject to a suspensive condition: obtaining financing within a period of one year. The seller, a surgeon by profession, withdraws before the expiry of the period. The buyer sues. The Court of Appeal rules in favour of the seller, but the Court of Cassation quashes the judgment. For the supreme judges, the seller failed in his obligation of good faith by preventing the fulfilment of the condition.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr X, owner in Mauguio, had promised to sell his shares in a company to a fellow surgeon, Mr Y. The promise was subject to a suspensive condition: obtaining a loan within one year from 1 May 1985. During this period, the parties had undertaken to perform the condition in good faith. But the seller changed his mind and refused to sign the final deed, claiming that the condition had not been fulfilled.

The buyer then took the matter to court. At first instance, the court ruled in favour of Mr Y, finding that the seller had obstructed the condition. However, the Court of Appeal reversed this judgment, considering that the condition had not been fulfilled and that the seller was free. The case went up to the Court of Cassation, which ruled in favour of the buyer.

What is interesting is that the seller himself contributed to the failure of the condition. undefined, I have come across cases where owners in Sète delayed matters to obtain a better price. But beware: the Court of Cassation reminds us that bad faith does not pay.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Court of Cassation relies on Article 1175 of the Civil Code, which provides: "Every condition must be performed in the manner that the parties have presumably intended and understood it should be performed." In simple terms, this means that the parties must perform the condition in good faith, that is, as they agreed, and not by preventing its fulfilment.

The judges considered that the seller had violated this obligation by withdrawing without valid reason. They held that the suspensive condition (obtaining the loan) had been thwarted by the seller's conduct. The Court of Appeal had erred by merely noting that the condition had not been fulfilled, without verifying whether the seller had hindered its fulfilment.

This decision confirms consistent case law: the suspensive condition must not be a pretext to renege on an undertaking. This is a useful reminder for all property professionals. However, be aware: the solution is not automatic. The bad faith must be proven, which can be tricky. What few people know is that Article 1175 is often invoked in connection with mortgage loans.

What This Means for You — In Practical Terms

For a seller-owner in Mauguio: you cannot unilaterally withdraw after signing a promise to sell subject to a suspensive condition. If you do, you risk damages. Example: if the buyer has already paid application fees (around €500) and you refuse to sell, you will have to compensate them.

For a buyer in Sète: if the seller obstructs the suspensive condition (e.g., by refusing to provide the documents necessary for the loan), you can apply to the court for specific performance of the sale or claim damages. In a recent case, a buyer obtained €10,000 in compensation for moral and financial loss.

For a tenant: this also applies to leases. If your landlord makes the signing of the lease conditional on obtaining a guarantee, they cannot withdraw without reason.

If you are in this situation, you must act quickly: the limitation period is 5 years. Gather evidence (emails, letters) of bad faith.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Draft the suspensive condition precisely: specify the deadline, the obligations of each party, and the consequences of non-fulfilment. Avoid vague clauses.
  • Keep all evidence: registered letters, emails, acknowledgements of receipt. In the event of a dispute, you will need to demonstrate good faith.
  • Do not delay in taking action: if the other party obstructs, send them a formal notice in writing. Prolonged silence may be interpreted as abandonment.
  • Consult a specialised lawyer: a professional will help you draft the clauses and anticipate risks. In Montpellier, Maître Zakine can advise you.

This decision follows the line of the Court of Cassation judgment of 13 February 1985 (No. 83-16.123), which already sanctioned bad faith in the performance of a suspensive condition. Since then, the courts have become increasingly strict. In 2020, the Montpellier Court of Appeal ordered a seller to pay €15,000 in damages for concealing defects.

The trend is clear: judges protect the buyer against capricious reversals. For the future, it is likely that the suspensive condition will be interpreted even more strictly, with a reinforced duty of loyalty. What this means: if you are a seller, do not rely on a suspensive condition to wriggle out of a promise.

Key Points to Remember

FAQ:

  • Can I withdraw after the suspensive condition has been fulfilled? No, the sale is final. Any withdrawal exposes you to damages.
  • What if the seller refuses to sign? Send a formal notice by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt. If they persist, apply to the court for a declaration that the sale is binding.
  • What are the time limits for taking action? 5 years from the date of withdrawal. But act quickly to avoid prejudice.
  • How much does a legal procedure cost? Between €1,500 and €5,000 in legal fees, depending on complexity.
  • How do I prove bad faith? Through written evidence (letters, emails) or witness testimony. Lack of response may suffice.

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) could save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je me rétracter après la levée de la condition suspensive ?

Non, la vente est parfaite. Toute rétractation expose à des dommages et intérêts.

Que faire si le vendeur refuse de signer après la réalisation de la condition ?

Mettez-le en demeure par lettre recommandée. S'il persiste, saisissez le tribunal pour faire constater la vente.

Quels délais pour agir en justice ?

5 ans à compter de la rétractation. Mais agissez vite pour limiter le préjudice.

Quel coût pour une procédure ?

Entre 1 500 et 5 000 € d'honoraires d'avocat, selon la complexité.

Comment prouver la mauvaise foi du vendeur ?

Par des écrits (courriers, emails) ou des témoignages. L'absence de réponse peut suffire.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 93-11.120
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 11 avril 1995

Mots-clés

condition suspensivearticle 1175vente immobilièrerétractation vendeurbonne foi

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Seller-owner in Mauguio: How to avoid a dispute

You have signed a promise to sell subject to a suspensive condition for obtaining a loan. The buyer has obtained their loan, but you have found a better price elsewhere. Can you refuse to sell? No, you risk damages (e.g., €10,000).

Application pratique:

Honour your commitment. If you change your mind, negotiate a settlement. If you refuse, the buyer can sue you.

2

Buyer in Sète: The seller is obstructing

The seller refuses to provide the documents necessary for your bank to process the loan. The suspensive condition is not fulfilled. What should you do?

Application pratique:

Send a formal notice to the seller by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt. If they do not respond, apply to the court. You can claim damages for the loss suffered (application fees, etc.).

3

Tenant in Montpellier: Lease subject to a suspensive condition

The landlord makes the signing of the lease conditional on obtaining a rental guarantee. After you agree, they withdraw. Is this legal? No, Article 1175 applies as well.

Application pratique:

Demand performance of the contract in writing. If they refuse, you can claim damages for the loss (cancelled move, etc.).

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide