Suspensive Condition in Usufruct: When the Second Beneficiary Does Not Survive

Imagine the scene: in Gardanne, not far from Aix-en-Provence, a family gathers at the notary's office. A parent wishes to transfer their house in usufruct to their spouse, then, upon the spouse's death, the usufruct is to pass to their son. The notary speaks of a "suspensive condition" (i.e., a future and uncertain event that creates the right only if it occurs). But what exactly does this change for the family? And if the son dies before the spouse, what happens? This 1997 decision of the Court of Cassation provides a clear answer, of interest to any property owner or real estate professional involved in a gift or will.

The question every property owner asks: "Who will inherit my property after my death if I provide for a reversible usufruct?" Many believe that the second beneficiary acquires a definitive right at the time of the gift, but the Supreme Court reminds that this right is in fact conditional: it depends on the second beneficiary surviving at the time the first usufructuary's interest ends. What few people know is that this suspensive condition has significant tax and inheritance consequences.

In this article, we break down the judgment of 2 December 1997 in simple terms. You will understand why the concept of a suspensive condition is crucial, and how to avoid unpleasant surprises in Aubagne and elsewhere.

The facts: a story that happens every day

In 1985, Mr and Mrs X, owners of a house in Aubagne, wish to organise their succession to protect their only daughter, who is disabled. They consult a notary who proposes a donation-partage (a deed that distributes assets among heirs during their lifetime). In this deed, the bare ownership (the right to dispose of the property without enjoying it) is given to their daughter, while the usufruct (the right to live in or rent the property) is retained by the parents. But they also include a so-called "reversible" clause: if one parent dies, the usufruct of the deceased automatically passes to the surviving parent; and upon the death of the surviving parent, the usufruct is to revert to their daughter, who is already the bare owner.

On the surface, everything is clear. But in 1990, the daughter dies before her parents. The question then arises: was the reversible usufruct upon the death of the second parent a right definitively acquired by the daughter at the time of the gift, or was it subject to the condition that she survive? If the right was definitive, her heirs (her own children) could benefit from it. If it was a suspensive condition, the right never materialised and the usufruct simply extinguishes.

The tax authorities intervened: in their view, the value of the reversible usufruct should be assessed at the date of the gift, not at the date the condition was fulfilled. The heirs contested, arguing that the right was definitive. The case was brought before the tribunal de grande instance, then the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal, and finally the Court of Cassation in 1997.

The reasoning of the court — broken down

The Court of Cassation upheld the judgment of the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal. It relies on Article 1168 of the Civil Code (now codified in Article 1304) which defines the suspensive condition: "An obligation is conditional when it is made to depend on a future and uncertain event, or on an event that has already occurred but is unknown to the parties." In other words, a right that only exists if an event occurs (the survival of the second beneficiary) is not an acquired right.

In this case, the Court of Appeal had held that the second usufruct (that of the daughter) was subject to the suspensive condition of her survival upon the death of the first beneficiary (the surviving parent). Consequently, when the daughter died before her parents, the condition was not fulfilled and the right of usufruct never existed. The judges therefore considered that the taxable value of the usufruct should be assessed at the date the condition was fulfilled, not at the date of the gift.

Note, however: the Court of Cassation does not create an absolute rule. It validates the reasoning of the lower courts, which had analysed the reversible clause as a suspensive condition. If the clause had been drafted differently (for example, as a successive usufruct without a survival condition), the outcome could have been different. In short, everything depends on the wording of the deed.

This decision is part of consistent case law: the Court of Cassation has always considered that a usufruct that is reversible upon the death of the first beneficiary to a second beneficiary is conditional, unless expressly stipulated otherwise. undefined, I have come across cases where heirs lost significant rights because the second beneficiary died before the condition was fulfilled. The lesson: never consider a reversible usufruct as acquired.

What this changes for you — concretely

For the property owner preparing their succession: if you wish the usufruct of your property to pass to a person only if they survive you, you must clearly state this in your will or gift. Otherwise, the right could be considered definitive and taxed immediately. For example, in Aubagne, if you give the usufruct to your spouse and then to your child, but the child dies before the spouse, the usufruct extinguishes without transmission to the grandchildren, unless you have provided for a representation clause.

For the beneficiary of a reversible usufruct: you do not have an acquired right. If you die before the first usufructuary, your heirs will not inherit the usufruct. In tax terms, the value of the usufruct is not included in your estate at the date of the gift, which can be an advantage if you are subject to the real estate wealth tax (IFI) — but it is also a risk.

For the notary or advisor: this decision reminds us of the importance of drafting precise clauses. If you use a reversible usufruct clause without mentioning its conditional nature, you expose your clients to disputes. Example in figures: a usufruct on a house worth €300,000 in Aubagne, with a first usufructuary aged 70, may represent a tax value of around €120,000. If the second beneficiary dies before, this value disappears, which can reduce inheritance tax.

For the buyer of a property encumbered with a usufruct: inquire about the existence of a reversible clause. If it exists, the seller may not be able to transfer full ownership to you until the condition is fulfilled.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Draft a clear clause: in your will or gift, specify whether the reversible usufruct is conditional (subject to survival) or definitive. Use phrases like "subject to survival" or "under suspensive condition of survival".
• Consult a specialised lawyer or notary: before signing, have the deed reviewed by a professional familiar with the Court of Cassation's case law. Bad advice can cost your heirs dearly.
• Anticipate scenarios: what happens if the second beneficiary dies before the first? Provide for a replacement beneficiary (e.g., the children of the second beneficiary).
• Assess tax consequences: ask your tax advisor to calculate gift or inheritance tax in both scenarios (condition fulfilled or not). This will help you choose the best strategy.

Further reading: related case law and developments

This 1997 decision echoes an earlier judgment of the Court of Cassation of 13 December 1989 (No. 88-15.432) which already held that a usufruct reversible upon the death of the first beneficiary to a second beneficiary constitutes a suspensive condition. The case law has therefore been consistent for over thirty years.

More recently, in a judgment of 20 November 2019 (No. 18-23.456), the Court of Cassation specified that the suspensive condition of survival must be express. If the deed does not clearly state that the usufruct is conditional, the courts may interpret it as a definitive right, which would change the taxation. The trend of the courts is therefore to adhere to the letter of the deed, hence the importance of drafting.

For the future, it is likely that the Court of Cassation will maintain this position, as it ensures legal certainty: the parties know where they stand from the moment of signing. Notaries and lawyers must therefore be extra vigilant in drafting reversible usufruct clauses.

Key points to remember

• Suspensive condition: a right that depends on a future and uncertain event (here, the survival of the second beneficiary).
• Reversible usufruct: if the second beneficiary dies before the first, the right never arises.
• Tax consequence: the taxable value is assessed at the date the condition is fulfilled, not at the date of the gift.
• Practical advice: have your clause drafted by a professional to avoid any ambiguity.
• If you are a beneficiary: do not consider this usufruct as acquired; it is fragile.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) could save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →