Sub-tenant's notice to quit a commercial lease: nullity for form? Cassation 2019
Droit-immobilier

Sub-tenant's notice to quit a commercial lease: nullity for form? Cassation 2019

📅 Décision du 24 October 2019⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 6 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation annulled a Court of Appeal decision that had declared void a notice given by a sub-tenant by registered letter. It recalls that for a notice at the triennial term, registered letter suffices, unlike the notice under Article L.145-9 which requires a bailiff's act.

Reference decision: cc • No. 18-24.077 • 2019-10-24 • View decision →

Imagine: you are the tenant of a commercial property in Vauvert, you have run your shop for three years, and you wish to leave. You send a registered letter to your landlord informing him that you are vacating the premises at the next triennial term. Everything seems normal, doesn't it? Yet your landlord might challenge the validity of your notice, arguing that it should have been served by a bailiff. The question is crucial: what form must a notice given by a sub-tenant follow?

This is precisely the issue that the Court of Cassation decided on 24 October 2019 (no. 18-24.077). The case pitted a sub-tenant, the company Lecorps services, against its head landlord. The sub-tenant had given notice by registered letter for the triennial term. The Court of Appeal had annulled this notice, holding that only a bailiff's act was valid. The Court of Cassation quashed this judgment, recalling that Article L.145-4 of the Commercial Code (which governs the triennial notice) allows registered letter.

This decision is a breath of fresh air for tenants and sub-tenants: a simple registered letter suffices to terminate a commercial lease at a triennial term, unless the contract provides otherwise. But beware, the rules differ depending on whether it is a notice at the initiative of the tenant or a notice to sell. Let us decipher this decision and its practical implications together.

The facts: a story like many that happen every day

The company Lecorps services was a sub-tenant of commercial premises located in Uzès, in the Gard. It had signed a commercial lease with the landlord company, which itself was the head tenant. In 2016, the sub-tenant decided to vacate the premises. It sent to its head landlord a registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt, dated 16 May 2016, informing him that it was giving notice for the triennial term of 1 September 2016.

The head landlord contested. He brought proceedings before the Tribunal de grande instance of Nîmes to have this notice declared void, arguing that the law requires a bailiff's act (extrajudicial act). According to him, Article L.145-9 of the Commercial Code, in its version resulting from the law of 6 August 2015, requires that any notice be served by extrajudicial act. The sub-tenant retorted that Article L.145-4, specific to the triennial notice, allows registered letter.

The tribunal ruled in favour of the landlord: judgment of 19 July 2017, the notice was void. The sub-tenant appealed. The Court of Appeal of Nîmes confirmed on 12 July 2018: in its view, a notice terminating a commercial lease can only be given in the forms provided for by Article L.145-9, i.e. by bailiff's act. The sub-tenant appealed to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation upheld the appeal on 24 October 2019, quashing the appellate judgment.

The reasoning of the court — explained

The Court of Cassation relies on Article L.145-4 of the Commercial Code, in its wording resulting from Law No. 2015-990 of 6 August 2015. This text provides that the tenant (lessee) may give notice at the expiry of a triennial period by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt or by extrajudicial act. This is a special provision, derogating from the common law of commercial leases.

The Court of Appeal had applied Article L.145-9, which requires an extrajudicial act for any notice. But the Court of Cassation recalls that Article L.145-4 is an exception: it expressly allows registered letter for the triennial notice. Moreover, the law of 6 August 2015 abolished the requirement of an extrajudicial act for this type of notice, in order to simplify formalities for small traders.

In this case, the sub-tenant had complied with the formalities: registered letter, six-month notice period before the term. The Court of Appeal therefore violated the law by requiring a bailiff's act. The Court of Cassation does not rule on the merits (validity of the notice) but refers the case to another Court of Appeal to decide in light of this principle. This is a confirmation of the wording of Article L.145-4, not a reversal: the Court had already so held in a judgment of 6 July 2017 (no. 16-15.036).

What this changes for you — practically

For tenants and sub-tenants: you can give notice at a triennial term by simple registered letter. Savings: a bailiff's act costs between €150 and €200. In Uzès, a trader who wants to leave his 80 m² premises can thus save this amount. Warning: the notice period is six months before the term. If you send your letter too late, the notice is void.

For landlords: you can no longer challenge a triennial notice on the ground that it was not served by bailiff. But check that the tenant has complied with the other conditions: notice period, content of the notice (mention of reasons?). If the lease contains a clause requiring an extrajudicial act, is it valid? The Court of Cassation did not say, but in principle a more stringent clause is possible.

For sub-tenants: the decision is even more favourable. A sub-tenant is a lessee like any other. He benefits from the same rules. So, if you are a sub-tenant, a registered letter suffices. But beware: the sub-lease must be regular (authorised by the head lease).

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Check your lease contract: some clauses impose additional formalities (bailiff's act, longer notice period). If so, comply with them, because contractual freedom prevails, unless the clause is abusive.
  • Strictly observe the deadlines: the triennial notice must be given at least six months before the term. For a lease starting on 1 January 2019, the first triennial term is 1 January 2022: send your letter before 1 July 2021.
  • Keep proof of sending: registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt is proof. Keep the receipt and the acknowledgement. If the landlord refuses to collect it, the period runs from the first presentation.
  • Get assistance: if in doubt, a lawyer specialised in property law can draft your notice. In Nîmes or Uzès, a 30-minute consultation (€45) can save you months of proceedings.

Further: related case law and developments

The Court of Cassation had already ruled in the same sense on 6 July 2017 (no. 16-15.036): for a triennial notice, registered letter suffices. This decision therefore confirms a consistent line. On the other hand, for a notice at the initiative of the landlord (refusal to renew, termination), the bailiff's act remains mandatory (Article L.145-9).

The Pinel Law of 18 June 2014 also relaxed the formalities: since 2014, the triennial notice can be given by registered letter. The law of 6 August 2015 specified that this option also applies to sub-tenants. The trend is therefore towards simplification, to make life easier for traders.

Warning: if the head tenant gives notice, this terminates the sub-lease. But the sub-tenant can then turn against his head landlord to claim damages. Recent case law (Civ. 3e, 12 May 2021, no. 20-13.756) has clarified that the sub-tenant can claim an eviction indemnity if the head lease is terminated without fault on his part.

Frequently asked questions

Can I give notice by email? No, the law requires a registered letter with AR or a bailiff's act. A simple email has no certain legal value.

What to do if my landlord refuses to recognise my notice? Summon him before the Tribunal judiciaire to have the validity of the notice declared. You can claim damages for abusive resistance.

Is the triennial notice possible at any time? No, only at the triennial term. If you want to leave before, you must negotiate a mutual termination or find a buyer for the lease.

What is the time limit to challenge a notice? The landlord has a period of two years from the date of the notice to bring an action for nullity. After this period, the action is time-barred.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je donner congé de mon bail commercial par simple lettre recommandée ?

Oui, si vous donnez congé à l'échéance triennale. L'article L.145-4 du code de commerce autorise la lettre recommandée avec accusé de réception. En revanche, pour un congé à l'initiative du bailleur (refus de renouvellement), un acte d'huissier est obligatoire.

Que faire si mon bailleur conteste mon congé par lettre recommandée ?

Vous pouvez saisir le tribunal judiciaire pour faire reconnaître la validité de votre congé. Conservez l'accusé de réception et prouvez que vous avez respecté le délai de six mois avant l'échéance. La jurisprudence récente vous est favorable.

Quels sont les risques si j'envoie mon congé par lettre simple ?

La lettre simple n'a pas de valeur probante. Le bailleur peut contester la date de réception. Privilégiez toujours la lettre recommandée avec AR ou l'acte d'huissier pour sécuriser votre départ.

Le sous-locataire peut-il donner congé par lettre recommandée ?

Oui, depuis la loi du 6 août 2015, le sous-locataire bénéficie des mêmes règles que le locataire principal. Un arrêt de la Cour de cassation du 24 octobre 2019 (n° 18-24.077) le confirme.

Quel est le délai de préavis pour un congé triennal ?

Le congé doit être donné au moins six mois avant l'échéance triennale. Par exemple, pour une échéance au 1er janvier 2025, envoyez votre lettre avant le 1er juillet 2024.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 18-24.077
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 24 octobre 2019

Mots-clés

bail commercialcongé triennalsous-locatairelettre recommandéeacte extrajudiciaire

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Trader tenant in Uzès wishing to leave at the triennial term

A trader in Uzès, tenant of an 80 m² premises, wants to vacate at the first triennial term. He sends a registered letter 8 months before the term. The landlord contests, arguing that a bailiff's act was necessary.

Application pratique:

The trader can rely on the Court of Cassation decision of 24 October 2019. He must prove the sending and receipt of the letter. If he is sued, he can seek dismissal of the landlord's claim and damages for abusive proceedings.

2

Sub-tenant of premises in Nîmes wanting to terminate the sub-lease

A sub-tenant in Nîmes signed a 3-year sub-lease. At the term, he sends a registered letter to the head landlord. The latter refuses, asserting that only a bailiff's act is valid.

Application pratique:

The Court of Cassation decision is directly applicable. The sub-tenant can send a registered letter with AR, and if the landlord contests, he can go to court. It is advisable to consult a lawyer to draft the notice.

3

Landlord of a commercial property in Vauvert contesting a notice

A landlord in Vauvert receives a registered letter from his tenant giving notice at the triennial term. He believes the notice is void because it was not served by bailiff and refuses to release the security deposit.

Application pratique:

The landlord is wrong. He must accept the notice and return the security deposit. If he brings an action, he risks being ordered to pay damages for abusive proceedings. Better to consult a lawyer to verify the regularity of the notice.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide