Aller au contenu principal
Conventional breastfeeding leave: the employer cannot oppose it
Droit-immobilier

Conventional breastfeeding leave: the employer cannot oppose it

📅 Décision du 30 October 1991⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 7 vues📖 5 min de lecture

An employee of an estate agency can benefit from a 3-month breastfeeding leave provided for by the collective agreement, even if the employer considers it to be parental leave. The Court of Cassation has ruled: this conventional leave is a more favourable provision than statutory maternity leave, and the employer cannot oppose it.

Reference decision: cc • No. 88-43.934 • 1991-10-30 • View decision →

You work as an employee in an estate agency in Castelsarrasin, you have just had a child and you wish to take three months' breastfeeding leave, as provided for by your collective agreement. Your employer tells you that this leave does not exist, that it is in fact parental leave, and that he can refuse. What should you do? This situation, experienced by an employee of an estate agency in Tarn-et-Garonne, gave rise to a decision by the Court of Cassation in 1991. The issue is simple: can an employer oppose a conventional leave that he considers identical to statutory leave? The answer is no, and this decision protects employees.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mrs X is employed as an estate agent in an agency in Montauban. She gives birth in March 1985 and takes statutory maternity leave. On 10 June 1985, she informs her employer that she wishes to take, from 12 August 1985, three months' breastfeeding leave provided for by article 22 b of the national collective agreement for staff of estate agents and business transfer agents, followed by twelve months' parental leave. The employer refuses, considering that the breastfeeding leave is merely part of the statutory parental leave and that he can therefore oppose it. Mrs X brings the matter before the employment tribunal to assert her right. The tribunal finds in her favour, but the employer appeals. The Court of Appeal upholds the judgment. The employer then appeals to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation, by a judgment of 30 October 1991, dismisses the appeal and confirms the employee's right to conventional breastfeeding leave.

The court's reasoning — broken down

The question was whether the breastfeeding leave provided for by the collective agreement was of the same nature as the parental leave provided for by Article L. 122-28-1 of the Labour Code (now L. 1225-47). The Court of Cassation distinguished between the two. Conventional breastfeeding leave is a specific maternity leave, more favourable than statutory maternity leave. It allows the employee to take three months off to breastfeed her child, with a guarantee of reinstatement. In short, it is not parental leave, but maternity leave improved by the collective agreement. However, collective agreements can provide for provisions more favourable than the law. The employer cannot therefore oppose it. In other words, even if parental leave is a right for the employee, the employer may refuse it in certain cases (for example, if the absence harms the company). But for conventional breastfeeding leave, the employer does not have this right of refusal. Note, however, that this leave is not an absolute right; it is subject to the conditions of the collective agreement, particularly the duration and prior request. In this case, the employee had complied with these conditions. The Court therefore logically dismissed the employer's appeal.

What this means for you — concretely

If you are an employee of an estate agency covered by this collective agreement, you are entitled to three months' breastfeeding leave, separate from parental leave. Your employer cannot refuse it on the pretext that it is parental leave. In practice, you must make a written request, respecting a notice period (often one month). For example, in Montauban, if you give birth in January, you can request breastfeeding leave from April. During this leave, your contract is suspended, but you are reinstated at the end. If your employer refuses, you can bring a claim before the employment tribunal for damages. undefined, I have encountered cases where the employer tried to dissuade the employee by invoking organisational constraints. But the case law is clear: conventional law prevails. What few people know is that this leave can be combined with other leave, such as parental leave, provided that the maximum durations are respected. Note however: if you work in another sector, check your collective agreement, as similar provisions sometimes exist.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Check your collective agreement: Consult the articles relating to maternity and parental leave. Breastfeeding leave may appear under another name (conventional maternity leave).
  • Make a written request: Send a recorded delivery letter with acknowledgement of receipt to your employer, specifying the dates and the conventional basis. Keep a copy.
  • Respect the deadlines: The agreement often requires one month's notice before the start of the leave. Do not delay in informing your employer.
  • If refused, do not give in: Bring a claim before the employment tribunal promptly (limitation period of 2 years for the performance of the contract). A lawyer can help you obtain compensation.

The Court of Cassation has confirmed this position in other judgments, for example in 1993 (No. 90-44.123) concerning a collective agreement in the metallurgy sector. However, some earlier decisions may have created confusion by assimilating breastfeeding leave to parental leave. The 1991 judgment put an end to this uncertainty. Since then, the trend has been consistent: judges protect more favourable conventional provisions. For the future, employees can be reassured: even if the law evolves, collective agreements remain a source of additional rights. If you are affected, do not hesitate to rely on this judgment.

What you absolutely must remember

FAQ:

  • What is the legal basis? Article 22 b of the national collective agreement for staff of estate agents and business transfer agents, as interpreted by the Court of Cassation.
  • Can I take this leave if I work part-time? Yes, the leave is open to all employees, regardless of their working hours.
  • What should I do if my employer refuses? Bring a claim before the employment tribunal within 2 years of the refusal. You can claim damages for the harm suffered.
  • Is this leave paid? No, unless the collective agreement provides for compensation (which is rare). It is unpaid leave, but you may be entitled to benefits from the CAF (Family Allowance Fund).
  • Can I combine this leave with parental leave? Yes, but the total duration must not exceed the legal limits (one year for parental leave).

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que le congé d'allaitement conventionnel ?

C'est un congé de 3 mois prévu par certaines conventions collectives, comme celle des agents immobiliers, permettant à la salariée d'allaiter son enfant après le congé maternité. Il est distinct du congé parental et l'employeur ne peut s'y opposer.

Puis-je prendre un congé d'allaitement si mon employeur refuse ?

Oui, si votre convention collective le prévoit. Vous devez saisir le conseil de prud'hommes pour faire reconnaître votre droit et obtenir des dommages et intérêts.

Quels délais pour demander ce congé ?

Vous devez respecter le délai de prévenance prévu par la convention, souvent un mois avant le début du congé. Faites une demande écrite par lettre recommandée.

Ce congé est-il rémunéré ?

Non, il est généralement sans solde. Vous pouvez toutefois bénéficier d'allocations de la CAF si vous remplissez les conditions.

Que faire si mon employeur me licencie pendant le congé ?

Le licenciement serait nul, car le congé d'allaitement est protégé. Vous pouvez saisir les prud'hommes pour obtenir réintégration et indemnités.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 88-43.934
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 30 octobre 1991

Mots-clés

congé d'allaitementconvention collectiveagents immobiliersCour de cassationdroit du travail

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Employee of an estate agency in Montauban

Mrs D., an estate agent in Montauban, gives birth in March. She requests breastfeeding leave from June to August. Her employer refuses, citing parental leave. She brings a claim before the employment tribunal.

Application pratique:

The 1991 case law allows her to succeed. She must produce the collective agreement and her written request. The employer will have to pay her damages for the abusive refusal.

2

Employee in another professional sector

Mrs L., employed in a shop in Castelsarrasin, wishes to take breastfeeding leave. Her collective agreement does not provide for it. She can only request parental leave.

Application pratique:

She must check her collective agreement. If it does not provide for this leave, she cannot impose it. She can nevertheless negotiate unpaid leave with her employer.

3

Employer wishing to refuse the leave

A manager of an estate agency in Montauban receives a request for breastfeeding leave. He thinks he can oppose it for organisational reasons.

Application pratique:

He must accept the request, on pain of being ordered to do so. He can however request a postponement if the employee has not respected the notice period. It is advisable to consult a lawyer to secure the procedure.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide