Annual Leave: the Legal Period from 1 May to 31 October
Droit-immobilier

Annual Leave: the Legal Period from 1 May to 31 October

📅 Décision du 22 February 1983⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 6 vues📖 2 min de lecture

It follows from the provisions of Article L. 223-7 of the French Labour Code (Code du travail) that the period for annual leave is fixed by collective agreements and must, in all cases, include the period from 1 May to 31 October of each year. It is only in the absence of a collective agreement that the said period is fixed by the employer, by reference to custom and after consultation with the staff delegates and the works council. An appeal against a decision is liable to be set aside by the Cour de cassation where it finds an employer guilty of infringing the aforementioned text on the ground that, without prior consultation of the staff delegates, the employer modified, within the limits fixed by law and recalled above, the date of the employees' departure on holiday, within the framework of the collective agreement in force in the establishment, which authorised both the organisation of leave by rotation and the annual closure of the establishment and permitted the conclusion of particular agreements with a view to spreading out leave.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 81-95.013 • 1983-02-22 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The Situation

It follows from the provisions of Article L. 223-7 of the French Labour Code that the period for annual leave is fixed by collective agreements and must, in all cases, include the period from 1 May to 31 October of each year. It is only in the absence of a collective agreement that the said period is fixed by the employer, by reference to custom and after consultation with the staff delegates and the works council. An appeal against a decision is liable to be set aside by the Cour de cassation where it finds an employer guilty of infringing the aforementioned text on the ground that, without prior consultation of the staff delegates, the employer modified, within the limits fixed by law and recalled above, the date of the employees' departure on holiday, within the framework of the collective agreement in force in the establishment, which authorised both the organisation of leave by rotation and the annual closure of the establishment and permitted the conclusion of particular agreements with a view to spreading out leave.

What the Law Says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key Points

  • Strictly observe the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (titles, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 81-95.013
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 22 février 1983

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord seeks to extend holiday period

A landlord in Lyon owns a commercial property leased to a retail tenant. The tenant's staff collective agreement sets the annual leave period from 1 May to 31 October. The landlord wants to change the closure dates to align with a new office lease, but the tenant refuses, citing the collective agreement.

Application pratique:

This case law confirms that the employer (tenant) must respect the leave period set by collective agreement, which includes 1 May to 31 October. The landlord cannot unilaterally force a change; instead, negotiate with the tenant and consult staff delegates if modification is needed. The landlord should review the lease terms and consider mediation before any legal action.

2

First-time buyer discovers appeal deadline

A first-time buyer in Nice purchases an apartment but later finds a defect in the title deed. He misses the 10-year legal appeal deadline by two months. The seller refuses to negotiate, citing the expired limitation period.

Application pratique:

This case underscores strict time limits for property disputes. The buyer should have acted within the legal timeframe (here, 10 years from deed signature). Since the deadline passed, the buyer may lose rights. To avoid this, always keep documents and set reminders for key dates. Consult a lawyer immediately upon discovering any issue.

3

Co-owner in dispute over building works

A co-owner in a Paris condominium (copropriété) wants to add a balcony, but the building's rules require prior consultation of all co-owners. The co-owner proceeds without approval, sparking a dispute. The syndic decides to sue.

Application pratique:

This case law highlights the necessity of prior consultation (here, staff delegates analogy). In copropriété, any modification affecting common areas or external appearance requires a vote at the general meeting. The co-owner must first obtain written consent from the syndic and majority of co-owners. If not, the syndic can seek annulment and demand restoration. Always follow the copropriété's internal rules and consult a lawyer before starting works.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide