Reference decision: cc • No. 78-41.781 • 1980-05-30 • View the decision →
Imagine yourself in Lambersart, on a Monday morning. You are an employee in a small retail business. Your leave has come, but your boss asks you to stay and work, promising to pay you for the extra days. You accept, thinking you are getting a good deal: you work and receive double pay. But a few months later, when you leave the company, you claim compensatory leave allowance for those days not taken. Your employer refuses. Who is right? The question that every owner of their working time asks: can days off be exchanged for money? This decision of the Court of Cassation of 30 May 1980 (No. 78-41.781) gives a clear answer: except in case of termination of the contract, it is prohibited. Even an agreement between you and your employer would be worthless. Explanations.
The facts: a story that happens every day
Mr. Dubuisson works for the company Electric-Radio. His contract is governed by the collective agreement for commerce. At the time, he takes his leave, but during a period of actual service giving entitlement to leave, he continues to work for his employer. Later, he claims a supplementary leave allowance for these days worked. The first instance court rules in his favour, considering that the employer had implicitly agreed to pay these days as paid leave.
The company Electric-Radio contests. It argues that Dubuisson has already received his salary for this period, and that an additional allowance would be contrary to Article 122 of the Overseas Labour Code (in fact, the code applicable in mainland France has similar provisions). The case goes up to the Court of Cassation. The employee, for his part, relies on the implicit agreement with his boss. But the highest court will quash the judgment, referring the parties to another court of appeal.
The reasoning of the court — analysed
The Court of Cassation relies on Article 122 of the Act of 15 December 1952 enacting the Overseas Labour Code. This text, the spirit of which is reproduced in the current Labour Code (Articles L. 3141-1 et seq.), provides that any agreement providing for compensatory leave allowance in lieu of leave is void, except in case of termination of the contract before the employee has acquired the right to leave. In concrete terms, this means that you cannot waive your days off for money, unless you leave the company.
Why such a strict rule? Because the right to paid leave is a matter of public policy: it protects the worker's health and cannot be circumvented. The judges consider that if an employee works during his leave, he already receives a salary. Paying him a leave allowance in addition would amount to paying him twice for the same work, which the law prohibits. The Court even specifies that the agreement between Dubuisson and his employer on the payment of such an allowance would be unlawful. In short, even if both parties agree, it is void.
This decision confirms consistent case law: the right to leave cannot be replaced by financial compensation, except in case of termination. It also reminds that lower courts cannot circumvent this rule by inventing an implicit agreement.
What this means for you — concretely
For employees: if your employer offers you to work during your leave in exchange for double pay, be wary. The agreement will not hold up in court. You will not be able to claim additional allowance if you remain in the company. On the other hand, if your contract ends (resignation, dismissal, retirement), you are entitled to a compensatory allowance for untaken leave.
For employers: do not think you can deal with unexpected absences by asking an employee to work during their holidays, even with their agreement. You risk back-pay claims or damages. Example: in Tourcoing, a retail employer had to pay €3,000 in back-pay after having a salesperson work during their leave without granting compensatory rest.
For real estate professionals (agents, managers): this decision has little direct impact, but it reminds that agreements contrary to public policy are void. For example, a tenancy agreement cannot derogate from rules on deposits or notice periods.
Four tips to avoid this type of dispute
- Never work during your leave without subsequent effective rest: if you absolutely must be present, agree in writing to postpone the leave, and take it later.
- In case of termination, check your leave balance: the compensatory allowance is due even if you worked during the leave. Calculate it accurately (10% of gross remuneration received during the reference period).
- For the employer, never sign a buy-back agreement for leave days: it would be void, unless the employee leaves the company. Instead, use a time savings account if your collective agreement permits.
- When in doubt, consult a lawyer: the rules on paid leave are complex and vary according to collective agreements. Personalised advice can avoid litigation.
Further reading: related case law and developments
This 1980 decision is still relevant today. It was confirmed by a Court of Cassation decision of 13 June 2012 (No. 10-27.570) which reminds that compensatory leave allowance is only due in case of termination. The Court of Justice of the European Union also held, in the Schultz-Hoff case (2009), that the right to annual paid leave is a fundamental principle of social law, which cannot be replaced by an allowance.
The trend of the courts is therefore very protective of the employee's right to actually take their leave. Any attempt to monetise rest days is viewed unfavourably. For the future, it is likely that judges will continue to penalise fraudulent agreements, even implicit ones.
Key points to remember
FAQ: practical questions
- Can I be paid for untaken leave if I stay in the company? No, unless your collective agreement provides for a time savings account or a limited buy-back scheme (e.g., days for splitting leave).
- What if my employer forces me to work during my leave? Refuse in writing and request postponement of the leave. Keep evidence (emails, texts). File a claim with the employment tribunal if necessary.
- Is the compensatory allowance taxable? Yes, it is subject to income tax and social security contributions, like salary.
- What amount of allowance in case of termination? The allowance equals one-tenth of the gross remuneration received during the reference period (usually 1 June to 31 May).
- Does this rule apply to managers on a flat-rate days basis? Yes, flat-rate days do not allow circumventing the right to paid leave.
Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →
📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation |
→ Browse all our legal articles

