Local Public Holidays and the 5th Week of Leave: Allowed to Accumulate
Droit-immobilier

Local Public Holidays and the 5th Week of Leave: Allowed to Accumulate

📅 Décision du 19 November 1987⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation ruled that local public holidays, such as those in Chalon-sur-Saône or Paray-le-Monial, are not additional paid leave. They can therefore be accumulated with the 5th week of paid leave, unlike other rights arising from local customs.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 86-12.370 • 1987-11-19 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are employed in a garment factory in Chalon-sur-Saône. Your collective agreement already grants you two additional days of leave for seniority, and by company agreement, you benefit from Easter Monday as a paid day off. In 1982, a national agreement introduced a fifth week of paid leave. Your employer then announces that, to compensate, he is abolishing the payment for Easter Monday. Is this legal?

This question has been asked by thousands of employees and employers. The answer came from the Court of Cassation in a judgment of 19 November 1987. The judges ruled: local public holidays (such as those of Saint-Martin in Paray-le-Monial) remain due, even if you now benefit from five weeks of leave. Why? Because a public holiday is not additional paid leave. Simple? Not so much.

In this article, I decipher this decision and its consequences for employees and employers, particularly in the region of Chalon-sur-Saône. You will see how the Court distinguished between the different types of days off, and what this means concretely for your pay.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr. X, an employee of a clothing company in Paray-le-Monial, had for years benefited from local public holidays as paid days off, in accordance with a local custom. In 1982, the clothing industry signed a national agreement introducing a fifth week of paid leave. Mr. X's employer then considered that this new week "absorbed" the local public holidays: he stopped paying for them.

Mr. X brought the matter before the employment tribunal. He argued that local public holidays are not paid leave, but distinct rights. The employer retorted that the 1982 agreement stipulates that "the new right to a fifth week of paid leave does not accumulate with rights to additional paid leave days already existing". For him, local public holidays are indeed "additional leave".

The employment tribunal ruled in favour of Mr. X. The employer appealed. The Douai Court of Appeal upheld the judgment in 1986. The case went up to the Court of Cassation, which dismissed the employer's appeal in 1987. The employee won: local public holidays remain due, in addition to the five weeks.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Court of Cassation examined the national agreement of 7 April 1982. It looked at its key article, which provides for the non-accumulation of the fifth week with "rights to additional paid leave days already existing". But what is an "additional paid leave day"?

The Court answered: a public holiday taken off is not paid leave. Paid leave is a period of paid rest freely chosen by the employee, whereas a public holiday is a day off imposed by law, agreement or custom. The legal nature is different. Consequently, the 1982 agreement does not cover public holidays.

The judges specified that the agreement distinguishes three categories of additional rights:

  • Those arising from local customs or company agreements: they do NOT accumulate with the 5th week.
  • Those arising from the collective agreement, its annexes or riders: they are MAINTAINED.
  • Local public holidays: they are NOT paid leave, so the agreement does not concern them.

In this case, the disputed public holidays were granted by local custom. But the Court excluded them from the scope of the agreement by classifying them as non-paid leave. This is a strict but logical interpretation: two distinct legal concepts cannot be equated.

This judgment is a confirmation of previous case law: public holidays are autonomous rights. There is no reversal, but a welcome clarification.

What This Changes for You — Concretely

For employees: if you work in a company where local public holidays are taken off and paid (for example, Easter Monday in Chalon-sur-Saône, or Saint-Martin in Paray-le-Monial), your employer cannot abolish them on the pretext of granting you a 5th week of leave. On the other hand, if you benefit from additional leave days (for example, 2 days for seniority), these may be absorbed by the 5th week, unless they are provided for by the collective agreement.

For employers: be careful not to confuse public holidays and paid leave. If your company is located in an area where local customs exist (such as in the region of Chalon-sur-Saône), you must respect them. An employee who loses a public holiday could claim back pay for 3 years (limitation period for wages). For example, if a local public holiday is worth €100, the back pay over 3 years could reach €3,600 for 12 days.

For property professionals: you are not directly concerned, but your employer or employee clients may approach you. Knowing this case law allows you to refer them to a specialist lawyer.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Check local customs: inquire with the town hall or chamber of commerce to find out which local public holidays are in force in your municipality (Chalon-sur-Saône, Paray-le-Monial, etc.).
  • Consult your collective agreement: it may provide for additional leave days which, on the other hand, can be absorbed by the 5th week. Do not confuse them with public holidays.
  • Draft a clear company agreement: if you wish to modify leave entitlements, clearly specify what is paid leave and what is a public holiday. Avoid ambiguous wording.
  • Keep a written record: retain payslips and collective agreements. In the event of a dispute, you will be able to prove the existence of local public holidays.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

Before this judgment, the Court of Cassation had already ruled on the accumulation of paid leave with other rights. For example, in a judgment of 12 June 1986 (No. 84-41.234), it held that additional leave days granted by local custom could not be accumulated with the 5th week. The 1987 decision confirms this logic, but excludes public holidays from the scope of the agreement.

Since then, case law has not evolved on this point. The distinction between public holidays and paid leave is well established. However, the question of "bridge days" (days off between a public holiday and the weekend) sometimes remains contentious. Courts generally treat them as public holidays if provided for by custom or agreement.

For the future, legislative developments on paid leave (such as the 2016 Labour Law) have not called this case law into question. Local public holidays therefore remain protected.

Checklist Before Taking Action

If you are an employee and your employer abolishes a local public holiday:

  1. Check the existence of the local custom with your town hall or trade union.
  2. Consult your collective agreement to see if it mentions this public holiday.
  3. Gather your payslips for the last 3 years to calculate the loss.
  4. Send a recorded delivery letter to your employer asking for the reinstatement of the public holiday and back pay.
  5. If refused, bring the matter before the employment tribunal. You have 3 years to act.

If you are an employer:

  1. List the local public holidays applicable in your geographical area (Chalon-sur-Saône, Paray-le-Monial...).
  2. Check that your company agreement or collective agreement does not implicitly abolish them.
  3. If in doubt, seek legal advice before modifying your employees' rights.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Un jour férié local est-il un congé payé supplémentaire ?

Non, selon la Cour de cassation, un jour férié chômé n'est pas un congé payé. Il s'agit d'un droit distinct, qui peut donc se cumuler avec la 5e semaine de congés payés.

Puis-je perdre mes jours fériés locaux si mon employeur m'accorde une 5e semaine de congés ?

Non, si ces jours fériés sont prévus par un usage local (comme à Chalon-sur-Saône ou Paray-le-Monial) ou par la convention collective, ils restent dus en plus des 5 semaines. Seuls les jours de congés supplémentaires (ex : pour ancienneté) peuvent être absorbés.

Quels délais pour réclamer un rappel de salaire pour jours fériés non payés ?

Vous avez 3 ans pour agir devant le conseil de prud'hommes à compter de la date d'exigibilité du salaire. Conservez vos bulletins de paie.

Que faire si mon employeur supprime un jour férié local ?

Rassemblez vos preuves (bulletins de paie, convention collective, attestation de la mairie), envoyez un courrier recommandé à votre employeur, et en cas de refus, saisissez le conseil de prud'hommes.

Cette jurisprudence s'applique-t-elle à tous les secteurs ?

Oui, le principe dégagé par la Cour de cassation est général : les jours fériés locaux ne sont pas des congés payés. Mais vérifiez les textes applicables à votre branche.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 86-12.370
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 19 novembre 1987

Mots-clés

congés payésjours fériés locaux5ème semainecumulaccord national habillement

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Employee losing a local public holiday in Chalon-sur-Saône

Paul works in a textile company in Chalon-sur-Saône. For 20 years, Easter Monday has been a paid day off by local custom. In 2023, his employer grants him the 5th week of leave and abolishes the payment for Easter Monday.

Application pratique:

Paul can claim back pay for 3 years. He must challenge in writing and, if necessary, bring the matter before the employment tribunal. The 1987 case law protects him: the public holiday is not paid leave, so it remains due.

2

Employer wishing to harmonise leave entitlements

A company in Paray-le-Monial has several sites with different customs: some employees have local public holidays, others do not. The employer wants to standardise by abolishing these public holidays for everyone.

Application pratique:

He cannot unilaterally abolish a more favourable local custom. He must negotiate with the unions or, failing that, maintain acquired rights. A collective agreement may provide for compensation, but not outright abolition.

3

Property professional advising an employer client

An estate agent in Chalon-sur-Saône advises a building contractor who employs 5 workers. The contractor wants to know if he can replace local public holidays with the 5th week of leave.

Application pratique:

The agent should refer him to a specialist lawyer. The answer is no: local public holidays are distinct rights. The employer risks back pay claims and employment tribunal proceedings.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide