Unpaid Holiday Pay: When Can You Still Claim Your Money?

Imagine yourself, owner of a small business in Capbreton. Summer is in full swing, your employees go on holiday, and you scrupulously pay their holiday pay (the amount due for their leave). But here's the thing: a year later, one of them claims an additional day, arguing that a public holiday fell during their leave. You think it's too late, that the time limit has passed. You're wrong.

This situation, seemingly ordinary, hides an essential legal question: when does the time limit for claiming unpaid holiday pay really start? Is it when you go on holiday, as one might intuitively think? The answer, given by the highest French judicial court, goes against what many employers and even employees believe.

In a judgment of 4 December 1996, the Cour de cassation (the supreme court that checks the correct application of the law by lower courts) established a clear principle, protective of employees. This principle, often little-known, can change the game for thousands of contentious situations, from shops in Mont-de-Marsan to businesses on the Landes coast. But what exactly does this change for you, owner, tenant who might be an employee, or real estate professional managing staff?

The facts: a story as it happens every day

The story begins in 1987. Mr Durand and his colleagues, employees of a company, go on summer leave. Their holiday starts on a Friday in July, the day they receive their holiday pay. Saturday 15 August, a public holiday, falls right in the middle of this rest period. However, the law provides that a public holiday occurring during paid leave does not count as a day of leave taken; it must be compensated by an additional day of rest or a payment.

Mr Durand and his colleagues therefore consider themselves entitled to an additional day of paid leave. But time passes. It is only on 22 July 1992 – nearly five years later – that they bring the matter before the conseil de prud'hommes (the specialised tribunal for disputes between employers and employees) to claim payment for this day.

The employer immediately raises a plea of inadmissibility (a procedural means aimed at having the claim declared inadmissible without examining the merits) based on limitation (the time limit beyond which one can no longer take legal action). They invoke the five-year limitation period for wages, asserting that the time limit started to run on the day of going on leave, in July 1987. According to them, since the employees acted in July 1992, they are just at the limit, or even out of time.

The employment tribunal judges, then the cour d'appel (the court that re-examines cases on facts and law after a first judgment), reject this argument. They consider that the starting point of the time limit is not the date of going on leave, but the end of the period during which the additional day could have been taken. In this case, this day could have been added to the fifth week of paid leave, scheduled at the end of 1987. Thus, the limitation period only started at the end of that period, making the employees' action perfectly admissible. The employer, dissatisfied, appeals to the Cour de cassation.

The court's reasoning – analysed

The Cour de cassation, in its judgment of 4 December 1996, confirms the lower courts' solution. Its reasoning, although technical, rests on simple and fair logic.

The legal basis invoked is that of limitation of claims (the time limits for claiming a sum due). For wages, which include holiday pay, the limitation period is five years (article L.3245-1 of the Code du travail). But the crucial question is: when does this five-year period start to run?

The Court establishes a principle: "The starting point of limitation in matters of holiday pay must be fixed at the expiry of the legal or contractual period during which the leave could have been taken." In other words, the time limit does not start on the date you go on holiday, nor even on the date you receive the main payment. It begins at the end of the period during which you could have actually benefited from the additional leave due.

Why this solution? Because it corresponds to the very nature of the right to paid leave. This right is acquired for a reference period (generally the calendar year). The employee can take their leave at different times during this period. If an element (like a public holiday) generates a right to additional leave, this additional leave is added to the stock of available leave. It can be taken at any time until the end of the reference period, or even carried forward within certain limits. Fixing the start of limitation at the end of this period protects the employee, who cannot know immediately if they have been wronged, and gives them reasonable time to exercise their right.

In the case judged, the cour d'appel had found that the additional day (due for 15 August) "could have been taken with the fifth week of paid leave at the end of the year". The Cour de cassation validates this reasoning: the five-year period therefore only started at the end of 1987, and the action brought in July 1992 was well within time.

This is not a reversal of case law (a radical change of position), but an important clarification. It fits into a protective interpretation of employees' rights, aligning the starting point of limitation with the effective possibility of enjoying the right, and not on a purely accounting event.

What this changes for you – concretely

This decision has very practical implications, whether you are an employer or employee, and even indirectly for real estate professionals who manage teams (estate agents, property managers, developers).

If you are an employer (landlord, business owner, developer): Be careful however: you can no longer consider that a claim for holiday pay is time-barred five years after going on holiday. You must calculate the time limit from the end of the reference period (often 31 December of the year concerned) during which the additional leave could have been taken. For example, for a public holiday occurring during summer leave 2023, the five-year period for claiming the additional day would only start on 31 December 2023 (if the reference period is the calendar year). The employee could therefore validly act until the end of 2028. undefined, I have encountered cases where employers in Mont-de-Marsan had to regularise old situations, with arrears calculated over several years, because they wrongly thought limitation had occurred.

If you are an employee (or tenant who is also an employee): You have a longer period than you thought to check your rights and claim what is owed to you. If you have doubts about the calculation of your holiday pay, particularly for past years where public holidays fell during your holidays, you may still have time to act. Concretely, for a given year N, you generally have until the end of N+5 to bring an action. An unpaid day of leave, depending on your salary, can represent a significant sum. For an employee on the minimum wage, this represents about €70-80 gross per day. Over several years and several employees, amounts can quickly accumulate.

For real estate professionals: Estate agents, property management or development employees are directly concerned. Good administrative and social management is crucial. How to react? You must implement rigorous monitoring of leave and public holidays, and keep documents (payslips, leave certificates) well beyond five years after going on holiday. Ideally, for ten years, to cover the potential limitation period.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Establish a written leave document for each employee each year. This document must specify the exact dates of leave, explicitly mention included public holidays, and indicate how they are treated (compensation by an additional day or inclusion in the count). Have it signed by the employer and employee.
• On your payslips, clearly detail the calculation of holiday pay. Indicate the number of working days of leave accrued, the number taken, and the treatment of public holidays. Total transparency often defuses conflicts.
• Keep all documents relating to leave and pay for at least ten years. The limitation period is five years, but the starting point can be delayed. Solid archives are your best defence in case of late challenge.
• In case of doubt, review annually with your employees. A simple check at the end of the year ("Have you taken all your leave? Have public holidays been correctly compensated?") allows problems to be resolved immediately, before they escalate.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

In-depth: related case law and developments

The 1996 judgment fits into a consistent line of case law from the Cour de cassation aimed at protecting employees in matters of limitation. Even before, the Court had recalled that limitation of wage claims could not run before the employee had knowledge of their rights (which is often the case for subtleties like public holidays).

An earlier decision, Cass. Soc. 19 January 1989, had laid similar foundations by indicating that the starting point of limitation for holiday pay could not be earlier than the date when the employee was able to know the extent of their rights. The 1996 judgment specifies and strengthens this orientation by explicitly linking it to the period when leave could be taken.

What few people know is that this case law has repercussions beyond simple public holidays. It can apply to any situation where a right to additional leave or a complementary payment arose during a period of leave (for example, in case of illness during holidays, under certain conditions). The trend of the courts is clear: interpret time limits favourably to the employee, as long as the nature of the right justifies a postponement of the starting point of limitation.

For the future, this case law remains relevant. It reminds employers of the importance of impeccable and anticipatory management of holiday pay, and employees that they have real time limits to assert their rights.

Checklist before acting

If you are an employee and think you have unpaid holiday pay:

1. Gather your payslips and leave certificates for the years concerned.
2. Identify precisely the reason: public holiday during your leave? Illness? Other?
3. Calculate the end date of the reference period (generally 31 December of the year of the facts). Add five years: this is your deadline for acting.
4. First try dialogue with your employer, relying on the documents. If this fails, consult a specialised solicitor or employment tribunal adviser to assess your chances and start proceedings if necessary.

If you are an employer and receive a claim:

1. Do not immediately reject on grounds of limitation without having checked the end date of the reference period.
2. Consult your archives to retrieve documents relating to the employee's leave for the year in question.
3. Check the calculation: did the public holiday indeed give rise to a right to compensation? Was this compensation granted (additional day or payment)?
4. If the right is well-founded and not time-barred, regularise quickly. The cost of an employment tribunal dispute often exceeds the amount of the claim.

Do you find yourself in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings – and often much more. Book an appointment →