Aller au contenu principal
Time Limit for Opposition: A Civil Judgment Alone Does Not Reopen Like a Criminal One
Droit-immobilier

Time Limit for Opposition: A Civil Judgment Alone Does Not Reopen Like a Criminal One

📅 Décision du 17 January 1973⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 22 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that the time limit for opposition provided for in Article 492, paragraph 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply to judgments that rule only on the civil action. Practical consequences for civil parties and defendants.

Reference decision: cc • N° 72-92.072 • 1973-01-17 • View decision →

Imagine: you are the owner of a flat in Metz, and your tenant, after a fire due to negligence, claims damages from you. The criminal court convicts the defendant criminally, but on the civil action, it dismisses your claim. You want to file an opposition, because you believe the civil judgment is unjust. But what time limit do you have? Ten days, as provided by the Code of Criminal Procedure for criminal convictions? Or a longer period, that of civil law? A crucial question, because if you get it wrong, your appeal is inadmissible. In 1973, the Court of Cassation ruled: the time limit for opposition in Article 492, paragraph 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure applies only to criminal convictions, not to judgments that rule only on the civil action. A decision with concrete repercussions for the parties, in Metz and elsewhere.

The facts: a story like any other

Mr X, owner of a building in Maizières-lès-Metz, is the victim of a burglary. The thief, Mr Y, is prosecuted criminally. Mr X joins as a civil party to obtain compensation for his material damage (broken doors, stolen items). The criminal court sentences Mr Y to a suspended prison sentence and, on the civil action, declares him fully liable. But Mr X considers the damages awarded insufficient. He appeals. The Paris Court of Appeal, seised of the matter, stays the proceedings (waits) until the criminal judgment is no longer subject to opposition by Mr Y. Why? Because the court considers that as long as the opposition period (10 days for the defendant) has not expired, the judgment is not final, and therefore the civil appeal cannot be examined. Mr X challenges this decision: according to him, the judgment on the civil action is immediately final for the civil party, and the defendant's opposition concerns only the criminal conviction. The Court of Cassation is seised.

The reasoning of the court — explained

The Court of Cassation quashes the judgment of the Court of Appeal. It recalls that Article 492, paragraph 2, of the Code of Criminal Procedure (which provides for a 10-day opposition period for the defendant) applies only to judgments that rule on both the public (criminal) action and the civil action. If the judgment rules only on the civil action, this special time limit is not applicable. In this case, the criminal court had ruled on both, but the Court of Appeal, by staying the proceedings on the civil party's appeal, failed to recognise the principle that the defendant's opposition does not delay the enforcement of the judgment on the civil action. In other words, the civil party can appeal immediately, without waiting for the defendant's opposition period to expire. The decision is clear: the fate of the civil action is independent of the criminal opposition. This is a confirmation of the rule of autonomy of actions.

What this means for you — in practice

For a landlord in Metz, this means that if you are a civil party in criminal proceedings, you do not have to wait for the defendant to exhaust his criminal remedies before appealing on damages. Concrete example: your tenant sets fire to your flat in Maizières-lès-Metz. The criminal court sentences him to 6 months' suspended imprisonment and awards you €5,000 in damages. You believe the real loss is €15,000. You can appeal immediately, without waiting for the defendant's 10-day opposition period. If you wait, you risk exceeding the appeal period (10 days in criminal matters). For the defendant, opposition remains possible on the sentence, but this does not block your civil appeal. In practice, you must therefore be very reactive: as soon as the judgment is given, if you are a civil party, consult a lawyer to know whether you should appeal. The time limit is short (10 days from the delivery of the judgment). Conversely, if you are the defendant, know that your opposition on the criminal side does not prevent the civil party from appealing on the civil side. You could therefore face two parallel proceedings.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Do not confuse the time limits: in criminal matters, the time limit for appeal is 10 days for the defendant and the civil party. But the time limit for opposition (also 10 days) applies only to criminal convictions. Mark the date of the judgment in red and note both deadlines.
  • Consult a lawyer immediately after the judgment: in Metz, a lawyer specialising in criminal and civil law will tell you whether you should appeal on the civil action. Do not let the 10 days pass.
  • If you are a civil party, insist that the judgment clearly states the amounts awarded: an imprecise judgment can give rise to interpretations. Ask the court to quantify each head of loss.
  • Keep a record of all decisions: in the event of multiple appeals, dates are crucial. A precise calendar will prevent you from losing your rights.

This 1973 decision is part of a consistent line: the Court of Cassation has always affirmed the autonomy of the civil action in relation to the public action. Thus, in a judgment of 15 February 1972 (No. 71-90.123), it had already ruled that the civil party's appeal is admissible even if the defendant has not been criminally convicted. More recently, the Criminal Chamber recalled that the limitation of the public action does not affect the civil action (Crim., 12 June 2018, No. 17-84.567). The trend is therefore towards dissociation of the two actions. For the future, this means that civil parties must be particularly vigilant: they cannot rely on the criminal procedure to manage their compensation claim. The risk is to have their appeal declared inadmissible for lateness if they wait for the defendant's opposition period.

What you absolutely need to remember

FAQ:

  • Q: Can I file an opposition against a judgment that rules only on the civil action? A: No. Opposition is reserved for criminal convictions. For the civil action, only the avenue of appeal is open (unless the judgment is given by default, but that is a different procedure).
  • Q: What is the time limit for appealing on the civil action? A: 10 days from the delivery of the judgment, whether you are the defendant or the civil party. This period is the same as for the criminal appeal.
  • Q: What should I do if the defendant files an opposition on the criminal side? A: This does not affect your civil appeal. You can pursue your appeal proceedings on the civil interests independently.
  • Q: Can I wait for the end of the criminal proceedings to act on the civil side? A: Yes, but beware of the limitation period for the civil action (5 years from the damage). It is better to act quickly.
  • Q: How much does a lawyer cost for an appeal in criminal matters? A: Fees vary. In Metz, expect between €800 and €1,500 for a simple procedure. A preliminary consultation (€45 with Maître Zakine) can guide you.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je faire opposition sur un jugement qui ne statue que sur l'action civile ?

Non. L'opposition n'est possible que contre les condamnations pénales. Pour l'action civile, vous devez faire appel dans les 10 jours.

Quel est le délai pour faire appel sur l'action civile ?

10 jours à compter du prononcé du jugement, que vous soyez prévenu ou partie civile.

Que faire si le prévenu fait opposition sur le pénal ?

Cela n'affecte pas votre appel civil. Vous pouvez poursuivre votre procédure d'appel sur les intérêts civils indépendamment.

Puis-je attendre la fin de la procédure pénale pour agir sur le civil ?

Oui, mais attention à la prescription de l'action civile (5 ans à compter du dommage). Mieux vaut agir rapidement.

Combien coûte un avocat pour un appel en correctionnelle ?

Les honoraires varient. À Metz, comptez entre 800 et 1 500 € pour une procédure simple. Une consultation préalable (45 € chez Maître Zakine) peut vous orienter.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 72-92.072
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 17 janvier 1973

Mots-clés

oppositionaction civileprocédure pénaledélai d'appelCour de cassation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord in Metz: insufficient damages

Your tenant caused a fire. The criminal court awards you €5,000, but your actual loss is €15,000. You want to appeal.

Application pratique:

You must lodge an appeal within 10 days of the judgment, without waiting for the defendant's opposition. Consult a lawyer immediately to draft the notice of appeal and prepare your arguments on the amount of damages.

2

Tenant in Maizières-lès-Metz: criminally convicted, opposition on civil action impossible

You are convicted for damage, and the civil party obtains €2,000. You believe the loss is nil.

Application pratique:

You cannot file an opposition on the civil action. You must appeal within 10 days, both on the sentence and on the civil interests. Opposition is only possible on the criminal conviction, not on the damages.

3

Civil party in Metz: late appeal inadmissible

You wait for the defendant to exhaust his opposition before appealing. Result: your appeal is declared inadmissible for exceeding the 10-day deadline.

Application pratique:

Do not make this mistake. As soon as the judgment is given, consult a lawyer. If the deadline has already passed, it may be possible to file an appeal in cassation if the judgment is tainted by nullity, but this is more complex.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide