Aller au contenu principal
Removal of the Rent Cap for Commercial Leases: The Judge Cannot Spread the Increase
Droit-immobilier

Removal of the Rent Cap for Commercial Leases: The Judge Cannot Spread the Increase

📅 Décision du 25 January 2023⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 2 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The French Supreme Court clarifies that the commercial rent judge does not have the power to spread the increase resulting from the removal of the rent cap. Only the landlord can apply the legal spreading. A decision that changes the game for tenants and landlords.

Leading decision: cc • N° 21-21.943 • 2023-01-25 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are a tenant of a shop in Antibes, on Rue d’Antibes, and your lease is coming up for renewal. The landlord announces a much higher new rent, due to the removal of the rent cap (i.e. the rent is no longer limited by the index, but can be set at the market rental value). You challenge this, and the case goes before the commercial rent judge. But here is the question that worries all players: can this judge, in addition to setting the rent, decide that the increase will be spread over several years to soften the burden? The French Supreme Court answered on 25 January 2023: no, this is not within its jurisdiction. Explanation.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mrs Y, tenant of a commercial premises in Le Cannet, operating a ready-to-wear boutique, sees her lease renewed in 2018. The landlord, Mr Z, notifies a new uncapped rent, increasing from €12,000 to €18,000 per year, a 50% increase. The tenant challenges this amount and brings the case before the commercial rent judge. She primarily requests that the rent be set at €14,000, and alternatively, that if the rent is set at €18,000, the increase be spread over three years in accordance with Article L. 145-34 of the Commercial Code (which provides for spreading the annual increase to 10% of the rent paid). The first instance judge sets the rent at €16,000 but refuses to apply the spreading, considering that he cannot rule on this point. The tenant appeals. The Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal confirms the judgment, but for a different reason: it considers that the spreading is automatic and that the judge does not need to order it. The tenant appeals to the French Supreme Court. The French Supreme Court must therefore decide: does the commercial rent judge have the power to apply the spreading?

The reasoning of the court — broken down

The French Supreme Court begins by recalling the wording of Article L. 145-34 of the Commercial Code. This article provides that, in the event of the removal of the rent cap, the rent increase cannot exceed 10% of the rent paid per year. But attention: this text only concerns the execution of payment, not the setting of the rent. In other words, the rent is indeed set at the market rental value (for example €18,000), but the landlord can only demand a limited increase each year (10% of the previous rent). The Court specifies that this spreading mechanism is separate from the setting of the rent. However, the commercial rent judge, according to Article R. 145-23 of the Commercial Code, only deals with disputes relating to the fixing of the price of the revised or renewed lease. He therefore does not have jurisdiction to rule on the spreading. The Court of Appeal, seized of the appeal, cannot have more powers than the initial judge. Consequently, the request for spreading is not admissible before the commercial rent judge. This is not a reversal of case law, but a confirmation: the French Supreme Court had already ruled in this sense in a decision of 16 September 2020 (n° 19-14.058). What few people know is that the spreading applies automatically, without the judge needing to intervene. It is up to the landlord, in the lease or in the notification, to provide for the spreading.

What this changes for you — concretely

For tenants: if you challenge an uncapped rent, you can no longer ask the judge to spread the increase. You must do this directly with the landlord, or, if the landlord has already provided for it, the judge does not need to order it. undefined that if the landlord does not comply with the spreading, it is not for the commercial rent judge to remind him, but for the ordinary court (Tribunal de grande instance or Tribunal judiciaire). For landlord owners: you must imperatively provide in the lease or in the renewal deed for the spreading of the increase, otherwise you will not be able to apply it unilaterally. For example, in Le Cannet, if the rent goes from €10,000 to €15,000, you can only claim €11,000 in the first year (€10,000 + 10%), €12,100 in the second, etc., until reaching €15,000. If you omit to write it down, the tenant could demand the full rent immediately (but you can always spread it in practice by only charging the 10%). Be careful though: if the tenant challenges the amount of the rent, he must do so before the commercial rent judge, but the issue of spreading will have to be decided elsewhere. This complicates proceedings. undefined, I have come across cases where tenants have been refused spreading by the commercial rent judge and have had to bring a separate action before another court to enforce it, with additional costs.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • 1. Draft a precise lease: clearly mention the terms of the removal of the rent cap and spreading. For example: "In the event of the removal of the rent cap, the rent will be set at the market rental value, but the annual increase cannot exceed 10% of the rent of the previous year." This avoids any dispute.
  • 2. Notify the new rent with the spreading: upon renewal, send a registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt mentioning both the uncapped rent and the amount actually due each year with the spreading.
  • 3. In case of a dispute, do not mix claims: if you challenge the amount of the rent, bring the case before the commercial rent judge. If the landlord does not apply the spreading, bring the case before the ordinary court. Do not ask the commercial rent judge to spread: he will dismiss your claim.
  • 4. Consult a lawyer before any action: a 30-minute consultation can save you months of proceedings. Maître Zakine can help you draft a compliant rent notification and guide you to the right court.

This decision is part of a consistent line: the French Supreme Court had already ruled on 16 September 2020 (n° 19-14.058) that the commercial rent judge has no jurisdiction to apply the spreading. The Paris Court of Appeal, in a decision of 10 September 2021, also followed this position. However, some Courts of Appeal, such as that of Versailles, had previously considered the opposite, creating a divergence. Now, case law is unified: the commercial rent judge cannot spread the increase. For the future, this decision could encourage the legislator to modify the allocation of jurisdiction, but for now, tenants must be vigilant. In practice, the commercial rent judge focuses on determining the market rental value, and spreading remains a matter of contract performance.

Checklist before taking action

  • You are a tenant: check if your lease contains a spreading clause. If not, ask the landlord to apply it. If refused, bring the case before the ordinary court, not the commercial rent judge.
  • You are a landlord: ensure that the renewal notification mentions the spreading. If you forgot, you can still include it in the signed lease.
  • In case of litigation: do not ask the commercial rent judge to spread the increase. Focus on the rent determination. If spreading is at issue, make a separate claim.
  • Time limits: the challenge to the rent must be made within two years of the notification. The action for payment regarding spreading is subject to a five-year limitation period.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 21-21.943
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 25 janvier 2023

Mots-clés

loyer commercialdéplafonnementétalement haussejuge des loyersCour de cassation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Tenant challenges rent increase spread

A boutique tenant in Cannes (Le Cannet) faces a 50% rent hike from €12,000 to €18,000 annually upon lease renewal. The tenant asks the commercial rent judge to spread the increase over three years to limit annual hikes to 10% of the old rent.

Application pratique:

The French Supreme Court ruled that the commercial rent judge cannot order spreading of rent increases; this is a contractual or legislative matter. As a tenant, you must negotiate spreading in the lease or rely on Article L. 145-34, which applies automatically if conditions are met. If the judge sets a market rent, you should request the landlord to apply the spreading voluntarily or seek legal advice to enforce it separately. Do not expect the judge to include spreading in the judgment.

2

Landlord sets new uncapped rent

A landlord in Antibes (Rue d'Antibes) renews a shop lease and demands a market rent of €24,000, up from €16,000, after the rent cap is removed. The tenant disputes the amount in court.

Application pratique:

The landlord can set a market rent but must be aware that the judge will only rule on the rent amount, not on spreading. If the tenant requests spreading under Article L. 145-34, the judge cannot grant it; the landlord may need to agree to spreading separately. To avoid litigation, consider including a spreading clause in the renewal offer. If sued, focus on justifying the market rent, as spreading is not a judicial remedy.

3

Co-owner disputes rent increase method

A co-owner of commercial premises in Paris (Le Marais) rents to a café. Upon renewal, the rent jumps from €30,000 to €45,000. The co-owner expects the judge to spread the increase over time to ease the tenant's burden.

Application pratique:

The co-owner should not rely on the judge to order spreading. Instead, proactively negotiate a spread with the tenant in the lease renewal agreement. If the tenant challenges the rent in court, the judge will set the market rent without addressing spreading. To protect cash flow, the co-owner can propose a voluntary 10% annual cap to avoid litigation. Remember that spreading is a contractual option, not a judicial power.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide