Landlord's Right of Withdrawal: Conditional Exercise Prohibited and Reservations Forbidden

Imagine: you are the owner of a commercial property in Redon, and you give notice to your tenant to regain possession. Then, you change your mind. Does the law offer you a way out? Yes, through the famous “right of withdrawal”. But beware: this tool is a double-edged sword. The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 9 March 2011 (No. 10-10.409), has just reminded us of a golden rule: the withdrawal must be total, without reservation, on pain of nullity. Explanations follow.

This decision applies to all landlords and tenants of commercial leases. Whether you are in Rennes or elsewhere, it sets strict limits on the ability to revoke a notice. How many times have I seen owners think they can “try” to change their mind, even if it means imposing conditions? The judgment of 9 March 2011 brings them back to reality: the right of withdrawal is a definitive act, not a negotiation.

So, how should it be exercised correctly? And above all, what are the consequences of a clumsy withdrawal? Let us delve into the facts of this case, then into the reasoning of the judges, before drawing practical lessons for your own situations.

The facts: a story that happens every day

The case began in Aix-en-Provence, but it could have taken place in Redon or Rennes. Mr and Mrs X are landlords of a commercial property leased to Jumbo Ventures Limited. The lease, originally signed on 26 March 2004, was renewed on the same terms. In 2006, the parties could not agree on the rent: the landlord sought an increase, the tenant disputed it. Proceedings to fix the rent were initiated.

But the landlord, dissatisfied with the situation, served a notice to quit on the tenant for 26 March 2008, the expiry date of the lease. Then, presumably after reflection, he exercised his right of withdrawal: he informed the tenant that he was withdrawing the notice. Problem: this withdrawal was accompanied by reservations. The landlord specified that he was withdrawing only if the tenant agreed to a new rent determination. In other words, he made his withdrawal conditional on the tenant's agreement on the amount of rent.

The tenant refused these conditions and went to court. The question put to the judges was simple: is the right of withdrawal exercised conditionally valid? The Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal, on 10 September 2009, answered no. It held that the withdrawal was not validly exercised because it was not irrevocable. The landlord appealed to the Court of Cassation.

Landlords often think they can “test the waters” with a conditional withdrawal. Serious mistake! The Court of Cassation would confirm this.

The reasoning of the court — analysed

The Court of Cassation dismissed the landlord's appeal. It relied on Article L. 145-9 of the Commercial Code (in its version then in force), which provides that a landlord may renounce the notice he has served, provided he does so within 15 days of the notification of the notice, and that this renunciation is “irrevocable”. The Court specified that the right of withdrawal, to be valid, must not be accompanied by any reservation.

In this case, the landlord had written: “I withdraw the notice on condition that you accept the proposed new rent.” However, this condition made the withdrawal revocable: if the tenant refused, the landlord could maintain the notice. The withdrawal was therefore not a definitive act, but a mere proposal. The Court considered that the landlord had not genuinely exercised his right of withdrawal, but had attempted to renegotiate the rent under the guise of withdrawal.

This decision confirms consistent case law: the right of withdrawal is an exceptional faculty, which must be exercised clearly and unequivocally. It is not a conditional right of retraction. The judges remind that the legal certainty of commercial leases requires that the parties know whether the lease is maintained or not, without ambiguity.

The Court of Cassation thus upheld the appeal judgment, which had held that the conditional withdrawal lacked irrevocability. It emphasised that the landlord, by imposing a condition, had not actually renounced his notice, but had merely proposed an alternative.

This solution is logical: if the landlord could impose reservations on his withdrawal, he could exert pressure on the tenant indefinitely, which would empty the right of withdrawal of its substance. The case law is therefore protective of the tenant, but also of the clarity of contractual relations.

What this means for you — practically

For landlord-owners, this decision is a warning. If you give notice to your tenant and then change your mind, you must exercise your right of withdrawal without any conditions. For example, if you own a property in Rennes and have served notice for 30 June 2025, you have 15 days to send a recorded delivery letter simply saying: “I withdraw the notice served on [date].” No “if you accept a rent increase”, no “subject to the signing of a new lease”. A pure and simple withdrawal.

For tenants, this decision is a protection. If your landlord notifies you of a conditional withdrawal, you can challenge it. You are not obliged to accept the conditions. The withdrawal is void, and the notice remains valid. You can then leave the premises without penalty, or conversely negotiate from a position of strength. I had a case where a tenant in Rennes received a withdrawal “on condition of paying 20% more rent”: the nullity was obvious.

For property professionals (agents, notaries, lawyers), this case law obliges you to draft withdrawal documents with extreme rigour. A simple “I change my mind” is not enough: you need a written document, dated, and above all without reservation. The slightest addition may be interpreted as a condition.

Practically, if you are a landlord and wish to exercise your right of withdrawal, act quickly: the 15-day deadline is mandatory. After that, you can no longer revoke the notice. And remember: a conditional withdrawal is equivalent to no withdrawal at all.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Consult a lawyer before serving a notice. A simple error of form or time can cost you dearly. A professional will verify the validity of your notice and advise you on the appropriateness of a withdrawal.
• Do not mix withdrawal and negotiation. If you want to renegotiate the rent, do so before the notice, or after a valid withdrawal. Never condition your withdrawal on a counter-performance.
• Strictly respect the 15-day deadline. The right of withdrawal is subject to a short time limit. Send your recorded delivery letter with acknowledgement of receipt within 15 days of notification of the notice.
• Draft a clear and unequivocal withdrawal. Use a simple formula: “I purely and simply withdraw the notice served on [date].” No reference to a new lease, no suspensive condition.

Further reading: related case law and developments

This decision is part of a line of strict rulings on the right of withdrawal. For example, the Court of Cassation had already held (Civ. 3e, 18 June 2008, No. 07-15.231) that the withdrawal must be notified to the tenant in the forms of Article L. 145-9, and that it is inadmissible if made by a simple letter without acknowledgement of receipt. Rigour is required.

Another decision (Civ. 3e, 9 December 2009, No. 08-20.214) clarified that the withdrawal can be exercised even after the 15-day period if the landlord has served a new notice? No, the Court said that the right of withdrawal can only be exercised once and within the initial time limit. No second chance.

The trend of the courts is clear: the right of withdrawal is a favour granted to the landlord, but its exercise is strictly regulated to protect the tenant. Judges do not hesitate to annul ambiguous or conditional withdrawals. In future, case law may become even stricter, particularly regarding form (requirement of a notarised deed?).

Key points to remember

• The right of withdrawal must be exercised within 15 days of the notice. After this period, it is definitively lost.
• The withdrawal must be irrevocable and without reservation. Any condition renders it void.
• If you receive a conditional withdrawal, you are not obliged to accept it. The notice remains valid, and you may leave the premises.
• Seek legal advice to draft or challenge a withdrawal. The stakes (rent, eviction compensation) justify this investment.
• When in doubt, simply renounce the withdrawal. It is better not to exercise it than to do it incorrectly.

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →