Aller au contenu principal
Rural Pre-Emption Right: Acquiring a Farm in the Name of an Adult Child
Droit-immobilier

Rural Pre-Emption Right: Acquiring a Farm in the Name of an Adult Child

📅 Décision du 04 January 1971⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 8 vues📖 5 min de lecture

The French Supreme Court allows a sitting tenant to exercise his pre-emption right by directly purchasing a rural farm in the name of his adult child, without losing the benefit of the tax exemption, provided he undertakes to farm the land for five years.

Reference Decision : cc • No. 68-12.608 • 1971-01-04 • View decision →

You are a farmer in Bayonne, tenant of a rural farm for years. The owner tells you he is going to sell to a third party. You have a pre-emption right (priority to buy) to acquire the property. But you want your adult son, who wishes to set up as a farmer, to become the owner. Question : can you use your pre-emption right to buy directly in your child’s name, while benefiting from the tax exemption (tax reduction) provided for by Article 1373-sexies-C of the General Tax Code ? Until this 1971 decision of the French Supreme Court, doubt remained. The judges ruled in favour of the farmer, subject to conditions. Explanations.

The Facts : A Common Story

Mr. Dupont, a farmer in Bayonne, is a sitting tenant (lessee) of a rural farm – that is, he rents land with equipment and buildings. The owner, Mr. Martin, decides to sell the farm. Mr. Dupont then exercises his pre-emption right, a legal right allowing the tenant to buy the farm he farms as a priority. But Mr. Dupont wants to set up his adult son, Pierre, as farmer. Rather than buying himself and then reselling or giving, he acquires the farm directly in Pierre’s name. The tax authority then refuses the exemption from registration duties (sale taxes) provided for by Article 1373-sexies-C of the General Tax Code for acquisitions made under the pre-emption right. Why ? Because, in its view, the exemption only benefits the tenant farmer who buys for himself, not for a third party, even his child. Mr. Dupont challenges this. The case goes up to the French Supreme Court.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The French Supreme Court, in its judgment of 4 January 1971, rules in favour of Mr. Dupont. It interprets Article 1373-sexies-C of the General Tax Code (which provides for a tax exemption for the acquisition of a rural farm by the sitting tenant exercising his pre-emption right). This text imposes only one condition : the undertaking to farm the farm for at least five years. It does not say that the purchase must be made in the tenant’s own name. In other words, the legislator intended to promote the setting up of young farmers, whether the tenant or his adult child. The Court states that “the tax exemption granted to the tenant farmer who exercises his pre-emption right, either for personal farming or to set up an adult child, is only subject to the condition of the undertaking to farm the farm for a minimum period of five years and no legal provision prohibits the tenant exercising his right from proceeding by direct purchase on behalf of his adult son whom he is setting up.” In clear terms, the tenant can act as intermediary for his child, as long as the latter undertakes to farm. This is a teleological (based on the legislator’s intention) rather than literal interpretation. The judges refuse to add a condition that the text does not contain.

What This Changes for You — Concretely

For landlord owners : you cannot oppose the tenant using his pre-emption right to acquire in the name of his adult child. The sale is on the same terms. For tenant farmers : you can pass the farm on to your adult child without losing the tax advantage. Beware however : the child must undertake to farm personally for five years. If not, the exemption is revoked. Worked example : in Tarbes, a rural farm worth €200,000. Registration duties would be about €10,000 (5 %). Thanks to the exemption, you save this sum. For purchasers : if you are the child, you must be of age and capable of farming. But what exactly does this change ? It means you do not need to already be an owner to benefit from the favourable regime. Your parent’s pre-emption right benefits you directly.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Formalise the farming undertaking in writing : The adult child must sign a deed of undertaking to farm the farm for at least five years, to be annexed to the sale deed. This avoids any dispute with the tax authority.
  • Check the status of sitting tenant : Only the tenant farmer can exercise the pre-emption right. Ensure the lease is current and that you are actually farming.
  • Respect the pre-emption deadlines : The tenant has a period of two months from notification of the sale project to exercise his right. After this period, he loses priority.
  • Consult a lawyer notary : Each region (Pyrénées-Atlantiques, Landes) may have local specificities. A professional will save you procedural errors.

This 1971 decision is part of a line favourable to the setting up of young farmers. It was confirmed by later judgments, such as that of the French Supreme Court of 12 June 1973 (no. 71-14.210) which extends the same reasoning to the case where the tenant buys on behalf of an emancipated minor child. The trend of the courts is therefore liberal : the pre-emption right is a tool serving family farming. What few people know is that this case law influenced the legislator during the reform of the agricultural tenancy status in 2014, which relaxed the conditions for transfer. For the future, we can expect judges to continue to favour the setting up of young farmers, even if the tenant does not buy in his own name.

Summary and Next Steps

Here are the key points to remember :

  • The sitting tenant can exercise his pre-emption right to buy a rural farm directly in the name of his adult child.
  • The tax exemption (Article 1373-sexies-C of the General Tax Code) is preserved if the child undertakes to farm for five years.
  • This solution has been validated by the French Supreme Court since 1971.

If you are in this situation : 1) Check your pre-emption right. 2) Have your child sign a farming undertaking. 3) Notify your intention to the owner within the deadlines. 4) Draft the sale deed with a notary mentioning the exemption. 5) Keep all supporting documents for the tax authority.

In a similar situation ? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je utiliser mon droit de préemption pour acheter un fonds au nom de mon enfant majeur ?

Oui, la Cour de cassation le permet depuis 1971, à condition que l'enfant s'engage à exploiter le fonds pendant au moins cinq ans.

Quel est le délai pour exercer mon droit de préemption ?

Vous disposez de deux mois à compter de la notification du projet de vente par le propriétaire pour exercer votre droit de préemption.

L'exonération fiscale s'applique-t-elle si j'achète pour mon enfant ?

Oui, l'article 1373-sexies-C du Code général des impôts ne fait pas de distinction : l'exonération est accordée dès lors que l'exploitant s'engage à exploiter pendant cinq ans, que ce soit en son nom ou pour installer un enfant majeur.

Mon enfant mineur peut-il bénéficier de ce dispositif ?

Non, la décision vise spécifiquement l'enfant majeur. Pour un mineur, d'autres mécanismes existent, comme l'achat par le preneur suivi d'un bail ou d'une donation.

Que se passe-t-il si mon enfant n'exploite pas pendant cinq ans ?

L'administration fiscale peut remettre en cause l'exonération et réclamer les droits d'enregistrement avec pénalités. Il est donc crucial que l'enfant respecte son engagement.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 68-12.608
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 04 janvier 1971

Mots-clés

droit de préemptionfonds ruralexonération fiscaleinstallation jeune agriculteurCour de cassation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Farmer in Bayonne wanting to set up his son

Mr. Dupont, farmer in Bayonne, wants his adult son to take over the farm. He uses his pre-emption right to buy directly in his son's name, saving €10,000 in registration duties.

Application pratique:

This case law allows Mr. Dupont to proceed, provided his son signs a farming undertaking for five years. He must notify the owner within two months and have the deed drafted by a notary.

2

Owner in Tarbes receiving a pre-emption for a child

Mrs. Martin, owner in Tarbes, receives a pre-emption notification from her tenant who wants to buy for his adult daughter. She questions its validity.

Application pratique:

The sale is valid. Mrs. Martin must sell on the same terms as agreed with the initial third party. She cannot refuse on the ground that the buyer is the tenant's child.

3

Young farmer in Mont-de-Marsan benefiting from exemption

Pierre, 25, sets up as a farmer. His father exercises his pre-emption right and acquires the farm in his name. Pierre undertakes to farm for five years.

Application pratique:

Pierre must comply with his personal farming undertaking. He can claim the tax exemption at the time of sale. In case of inspection, he must prove he is actually farming.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide