Life interest in use and habitation: what happens to the co-holder's right after the death of the exclusive beneficiary?

Imagine: you own a house in Illkirch-Graffenstaden, and you have granted a life interest in use and habitation to two people – for example, your ex-spouse and your new spouse. One day, one of the two beneficiaries dies. Can the other continue to live in the property? How far does his right extend? This seemingly technical question conceals a considerable human and patrimonial issue.

The French Supreme Court, in a judgment of 15 October 2008 (No. 07-16.921), ruled: the grant of exclusive and temporary enjoyment of the life interest to one of the co-holders does not definitively deprive him of his right. Upon the death of the person who had exclusive enjoyment, the other co-holder recovers his full right, and this for the rest of his life.

What does this decision mean for you, the owner or beneficiary of a life interest? How can conflicts be avoided? Let us decipher this judgment together, starting with the story that gave rise to it.

The facts: a story like many that happen every day

Mrs X and Mr Y were divorced. By a judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal of 27 October 1993, a life interest in habitation was granted to each in respect of a house in Paris. However, this right was to be exercised exclusively and temporarily by one of them, Mrs X, until her death. In short, Mrs X had the right to live alone in the house, while Mr Y, although the holder of the same right, could not exercise it as long as Mrs X was alive.

Upon Mrs X's death, Mr Y intended to recover his right of habitation. But the question arose: was this right definitively extinguished, or merely suspended? Mrs X's heirs contested Mr Y's claim, arguing that the life interest ends with the death of the beneficiary, and that Mr Y was no longer a holder of anything. The dispute was brought before the courts.

The Paris Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Mr Y, considering that the life interest was a "split" right: Mrs X had only the enjoyment, while Mr Y retained the ownership (the "bare ownership" of the right). Upon Mrs X's death, the enjoyment reverted to the ownership, and Mr Y became the sole holder of the right of habitation. The heirs appealed to the Supreme Court.

The reasoning of the court – dissected

The French Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the reasoning of the Court of Appeal. But on what basis? The life interest in use and habitation is a real right (a right in rem) provided for in Articles 625 to 636 of the French Civil Code. It allows its holder to live in a dwelling and use it as an occupant, but without being able to rent or sell it. In principle, this right is non-transferable and ends upon the death of the beneficiary.

However, the Court distinguishes two situations here: when the right is granted to several persons (co-holders), each has a potential right over the whole property. If one of the co-holders is granted exclusive temporary enjoyment, this does not mean that the other loses his right; he is merely temporarily deprived of it. The Court uses an analogy with usufruct (the right to enjoy a property without being its owner): the usufructuary may be deprived of his right for a certain time, but he recovers it afterwards. Here, it is the same logic: Mr Y was the "bare title holder" of the right of habitation, and Mrs X was its temporary "usufructuary".

This decision is important because it clarifies a point rarely addressed: the fate of the life interest in the case of multiple holders. It is part of a jurisprudential trend protective of beneficiaries' rights: judges avoid causing the loss of an acquired right, even if its exercise has been temporarily suspended.

What this changes for you – concretely

If you are the owner of a property in Strasbourg or Illkirch-Graffenstaden and you have granted a life interest in use and habitation to several persons, this decision directly concerns you. Here are the practical implications:

• For the owner-landlord: if you have granted a life interest to two persons, know that the death of one does not free up the property. The other beneficiary may continue to live there. You must therefore anticipate this eventuality in your calculation of the life annuity, as the duration of the right may be extended.
• For the surviving co-holder: you recover your right of habitation after the death of the other beneficiary. You do not have to leave the premises. Be sure to keep documents proving your status as a co-holder (notarial deed, judgment).
• For the heirs: if you inherit a property encumbered with a life interest, you cannot evict the surviving co-holder. You will have to wait for his death to recover full ownership. Example: in Strasbourg, an apartment worth €200,000, if the life interest is granted to two persons aged 70 and 75, the owner may have to wait 15 to 20 years before recovering the property.

If you are in this situation, you must check the deed constituting the life interest. If the exclusive enjoyment has been granted to one of the co-holders, the 2008 judgment protects you. On the other hand, if the deed provides for automatic extinction upon the death of the first beneficiary, that clause will apply.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Draft the constitutive deed clearly: specify whether the life interest is granted to several persons, and whether the enjoyment is exclusive or shared. Indicate the fate of the right upon the death of each co-holder. A notary in Strasbourg can help you draft tailor-made clauses.
• Include a reversion clause: if you wish the right to end on the first death, write it in black and white. Otherwise, the 2008 case law will apply by default.
• Anticipate family conflicts: in case of divorce or remarriage, the life interest can be a source of tension. A mediator or a lawyer specialised in property law in Illkirch-Graffenstaden can advise you in advance.
• Keep all judgments and deeds: if the life interest results from a court decision (as in the commented judgment), keep a copy. It will serve as proof in case of dispute.

In-depth analysis: related case law and developments

This decision is part of a line of judgments protective of life interests. For example, the French Supreme Court had already held (Civ. 3e, 20 March 2002, No. 00-15.678) that the right of use and habitation is a real right that follows the property, even in case of sale. In 2010, it clarified that the beneficiary of a life interest can require its respect by the new owner (Civ. 3e, 9 November 2010, No. 09-69.347).

The trend is therefore towards consolidating the rights of life interest beneficiaries. For owners, this means that it is difficult to get rid of a life interest as long as the beneficiary is alive. However, heirs can sometimes contest the extent of the right if the deed is ambiguous. The 2008 judgment is a good example of this strict interpretation: the right is not extinguished by the mere temporary lack of exercise.

Frequently asked questions

• Can I lose my right of habitation if I do not exercise it for several years? No, according to this judgment, the mere fact of not exercising the right (because another co-holder has exclusive enjoyment) does not cause it to disappear. You recover it as soon as you can exercise it again.
• What if the owner refuses to let me live in the property after the death of the other beneficiary? You must apply to the judicial court (formerly the High Court) to have your right recognised. A lawyer specialised in property law in Strasbourg can assist you. Timeframes vary, but an interim procedure can be concluded within a few weeks.
• What costs should I expect to enforce my right? Lawyer's fees vary: a simple consultation costs between €150 and €300, and a full procedure can range from €1,500 to €5,000 depending on complexity. Court costs (bailiff, expert) are additional.
• Does this decision apply to life interests constituted before 2008? Yes, because it interprets existing law. It applies to all life interests, regardless of their date of constitution, unless the deed provides for a contrary clause.
• Can I sell my right of habitation? No, the right of use and habitation is non-transferable by nature (Article 631 of the Civil Code). You cannot sell it, but you can renounce it.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation – and often much more. Book an appointment →