Droit Immobilier

Liable to cassation, the judgment which

📅 Décision du 19 March 1985⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The judgment that dismisses the purchaser of a plot of land in his claim brought against his vendors for not having informed him, at the time of the sale, of the existence of a party wall agreement concluded between the vendors’ predecessor in title and the owner of the adjoining land, and for having allowed a concrete footing to be installed in the subsoil of the sold plot, on the ground that the bad faith of the vendors, who claimed to be unaware of the agreement and the presence of the footing, was not established, without examining whether the vendors were not liable as universal heirs standing in the shoes of their predecessor, is liable to cassation.

Reference decision: cc • No. 83-14.036 • 19 March 1985 • View the decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The judgment that dismisses the purchaser of a plot of land in his claim brought against his vendors for not having informed him, at the time of the sale, of the existence of a party wall agreement concluded between the vendors’ predecessor in title and the owner of the adjoining land, and for having allowed a concrete footing to be installed in the subsoil of the sold plot, on the ground that the bad faith of the vendors, who claimed to be unaware of the agreement and the presence of the footing, was not established, without examining whether the vendors were not liable as universal heirs standing in the shoes of their predecessor, is liable to cassation.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 83-14.036
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 19 mars 1985

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide