Descriptive Statement of Division: Can This Document Deprive You of Your Rights of Enjoyment?

Imagine: you buy a flat in Plan-de-Cuques, with a nice private garden attached, clearly mentioned in the condominium regulations. A few years later, the developer decides to subdivide his lot and, in the descriptive statement of division (a document intended for land registration), he simply removes your right of enjoyment over this garden. What should you do? This question was brought before the courts by an owner, and the Court of Cassation ruled on 8 July 1992. This decision, little known to the general public, is nevertheless fundamental for all co-owners.

In this case, the condominium regulations of a building in Gemenos granted the owner of a lot a right of private enjoyment over part of the common land. The developer, using a power of subdivision, drew up a new descriptive statement of division that removed this right. But the owner contested, and the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal ruled in his favour. The Court of Cassation confirmed: the descriptive statement of division is merely a technical tool for land registration; it has no contractual character. It cannot therefore modify the real rights (rights over property) as they result from the condominium regulations, which is the founding deed.

But what does this actually change for you, as an owner in Marseille or the Alpes-Maritimes? This decision protects you against unilateral modifications of your rights through an administrative document. In short, if your condominium regulations grant you a right of enjoyment over a common part (garden, terrace, parking space), the developer cannot take it away from you by modifying the descriptive statement of division. A valuable legal certainty, especially in developments with private green spaces.

The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day

The story begins in a residence named "Le Christiania", in Gemenos, in the Bouches-du-Rhône. In 1969, a real estate company (SCI), owner of the entire property, established condominium regulations. These regulations provided that the SCI was the owner of a lot comprising a building and, above all, a right of private enjoyment over a fraction of the common land. This right was clearly delineated on a plan annexed to the regulations. Mr X, a private individual, purchased this lot in 1970. He thus became a co-owner, with exclusive enjoyment of part of the land.

But the SCI, which had retained other lots, decided to subdivide its initial lot to create new lots. To do so, it drew up a new descriptive statement of division on 1 August 1969 (even before the sale to Mr X, but published afterwards). In this document, it removed Mr X's right of enjoyment over the plot of land, converting it into a simple common part. Mr X noticed this and brought legal proceedings to have his right recognised. He sought the annulment of the descriptive statement of division insofar as it infringed his rights.

The Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal, by a judgment of 16 November 1989, ruled in his favour. It held that the descriptive statement of division, drawn up only for the purposes of land registration (to inform third parties), has no contractual character. It cannot therefore deprive a co-owner of a right of enjoyment recognised by the condominium regulations. The SCI appealed to the Court of Cassation. But the High Court dismissed its appeal on 8 July 1992, thus confirming the solution. A victory for the small owner against the developer.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Court of Cassation had to answer a specific question: can a descriptive statement of division modify the real rights of co-owners? For the judges, the answer is no. Their reasoning is based on the legal nature of the descriptive statement of division. This document, provided for by the Decree of 4 January 1955 on land registration, has the sole purpose of describing the lots and their shares of common parts, to enable their registration in the land register. It is not a deed creating rights, unlike the condominium regulations which are a contract between the co-owners.

In short, the condominium regulations are the "constitution" of the condominium: they set out the rights and obligations of each person. The descriptive statement of division is merely a technical description of it. If the regulations grant a right of private enjoyment, this right forms part of the lot, and the descriptive statement cannot remove it without modifying the regulations themselves. However, to modify the condominium regulations, the agreement of the general meeting of co-owners is required, and sometimes unanimity. Here, the SCI acted alone, which is illegal.

In other words, the Court of Cassation considered that the SCI, by using the power of subdivision conferred by the regulations, could not, through a simple descriptive statement, deprive Mr X of his right of enjoyment. The judges also emphasised that the right of enjoyment was attached to the lot, and could not be removed without the consent of the co-owner concerned. This decision is a confirmation of the primacy of the condominium regulations over technical documents. What few people know is that this solution has been constant for decades: the descriptive statement of division is merely an accessory.

What This Changes for You — Practically

So, in practice, does this decision really protect you? Yes, and here is how.

If you are the owner of a lot with a right of private enjoyment (garden, terrace, allocated parking space), this case law guarantees that the developer or the managing agent cannot take it away from you by modifying the descriptive statement of division. For example, in Gemenos, if your regulations grant you the enjoyment of a 100 m² garden, and the developer wants to take it back to build, he must obtain your consent or go through a modification of the regulations at a general meeting. However, be careful: if your right is not clearly mentioned in the regulations, but only in the descriptive statement, the latter could be challenged. Check your title deeds.

For a purchaser, this is an essential point of vigilance. Before buying a property in a condominium, do not rely solely on the descriptive statement of division. Ask to see the condominium regulations and their annexes (plans). If the seller promises you private enjoyment, make sure it appears in the regulations. undefined, I have encountered cases where purchasers lost their garden because it was only mentioned in the descriptive statement, subsequently modified by the developer. This decision gives you a solid argument to demand rectification.

For co-owners, this case law is a reminder: the condominium regulations are the law of the building. If you notice a contradiction between the regulations and the descriptive statement, the regulations prevail. You can ask the managing agent to update the descriptive statement to make it compliant. In case of a dispute, the courts will rule in your favour. In Plan-de-Cuques, such a conflict could cost you several thousand euros in legal fees, but thanks to this decision, you have a good chance of winning.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Keep your condominium regulations and its annexes carefully. They are your collective title deed. In the event of a modification of the descriptive statement, you will be able to prove your rights.
• Before buying, have a notary or a lawyer lawyer verify that the promised right of enjoyment is indeed included in the condominium regulations, and not just in the descriptive statement. A non-contractual right is fragile.
• If you are a developer or subdivider, do not attempt to unilaterally modify rights of enjoyment through a descriptive statement. This would be contrary to case law and could lead to your civil liability (obligation to remedy the harm).
• In case of a dispute, take action quickly. Limitation periods (time limits for bringing legal action) are often 5 years for personal actions. Do not wait until the situation worsens.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This 1992 decision is part of a consistent line of authority. As early as 1975, the Court of Cassation had held that the descriptive statement of division has only a declaratory role, not a constitutive one. More recently, in a judgment of 15 May 2019 (No. 18-14.267), the High Court reiterated that the condominium regulations prevail over the descriptive statement in the event of a conflict. The trend is therefore clear: the courts protect the rights acquired by co-owners in the regulations.

However, be careful: if the condominium regulations themselves are modified regularly (for example, to remove a right of enjoyment), this modification must comply with the majority rules of the Law of 10 July 1965. A simple decision of the general meeting cannot remove a right of enjoyment without the consent of the co-owner concerned, unless the regulations so provide. For the future, this case law remains relevant and applies to all condominiums, whether old or new.

Frequently Asked Questions

My descriptive statement of division mentions a right of enjoyment, but the regulations do not. What should I do? This is a problem. The regulations prevail, so this right is fragile. You can try to have the regulations modified by a general meeting, but unanimity is often required. Consult a lawyer.

Can I sue the developer if he modified the descriptive statement after my purchase? Yes, on the basis of this case law. You can seek annulment of the descriptive statement and damages. Be mindful of time limits: act within 5 years of discovery.

What are the costs of such a dispute? Expect between €2,000 and €5,000 in lawyer's fees for first-instance proceedings, plus any expert fees. But the stake (your right of enjoyment) could be worth much more.

Can the managing agent modify the descriptive statement without my consent? No, because the descriptive statement must reflect the reality of rights. Any modification must be voted on at a general meeting, and if it affects your rights, your consent is necessary.

Does this decision apply to rights of way? Indirectly. If a right of way is provided for in the regulations, the descriptive statement cannot remove it. But rights of way also fall under easements, which have their own rules.

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →