Aller au contenu principal
Payment guarantee for works: even after termination, the employer must still pay
Droit-immobilier

Payment guarantee for works: even after termination, the employer must still pay

📅 Décision du 18 May 2017⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation reminds that the payment guarantee owed by the employer to the contractor can be demanded even after termination of the contract, as long as the amount for the works has not been fully paid. A decision that protects contractors and their subcontractors.

Reference decision: cc • No. 16-16.795 • 2017-05-18 • View the decision →

You are a property owner in Saint-Amand-Montrond and have entrusted the renovation of your roof to a tradesman. During the works, a dispute arises, you terminate the contract. The contractor demands payment for the work already carried out. But you consider that the termination releases you from any obligation. Who is right?

This question, which every employer (owner who orders works) asks themselves, was answered by the Court of Cassation in a judgment of 18 May 2017: the payment guarantee provided for by law can be demanded even after termination of the contract, as long as the amount for the works has not been fully paid. In other words, terminating does not exempt you from paying what is due.

This decision, made in relation to a private works contract, concerns both individuals and professionals. It clarifies the employer's obligations towards the contractor, and has important practical consequences for all building industry players. Analysis.

The facts: a story like many that happen every day

A contractor, whom we will call Mr Dupont, enters into a works contract with an individual, Mr Martin, for the construction of a house extension in Aubigny-sur-Nère. The amount of the works is €45,000. During the works, disagreements arise over the quality of the finishes. Mr Martin decides to terminate the contract unilaterally, without paying the full amount owed to Mr Dupont.

Mr Dupont, who has already completed 60% of the works, i.e. €27,000 worth of services, demands payment of this sum. But Mr Martin refuses, arguing that termination ends the contract and therefore any obligation on his part. The contractor then applies to the interim relief judge (emergency procedure) to obtain an interim payment (advance on the amount due).

The Bourges High Court, then the Court of Appeal, rule in his favour: the employer must provide a payment guarantee, even after termination. Mr Martin appeals to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation dismisses his appeal and upholds the Court of Appeal's decision. It specifies that the obligation to guarantee payment for the works is not seriously contestable, as long as the amount for the works has not been fully paid.

The court's reasoning — broken down

To understand the judgment, we need to go back to the legal basis: Article 1799-1 of the Civil Code (in its version then in force) requires the employer to provide the contractor with a payment guarantee for private works contracts exceeding €12,000. This guarantee can be a bank guarantee or an insurance assignment. Its purpose: to protect the contractor against the risk of non-payment.

The debate focused on the following question: does termination of the contract extinguish the obligation to provide this guarantee? Mr Martin argued yes, because the contract no longer exists. But the Court of Cassation says no. Its reasoning is simple: as long as the works have not been fully paid, the contractor is entitled to a guarantee. Termination does not change the existing debt.

The judges rely on the text: the guarantee obligation arises at the time the contract is concluded and continues until payment is complete. Termination is not a ground for extinguishing the obligation to pay. This is a confirmation of case law: the Court of Cassation had already ruled similarly in 2013 (Cass. civ. 3e, 11 December 2013, No. 12-27.579).

In practice, this means that the employer cannot hide behind a termination to refuse payment. The interim relief judge can order the payment of an interim sum, because the obligation is not seriously contestable.

What this changes for you — concretely

For the landlord owner (employer): you must know that terminating a works contract does not exempt you from paying what is due. If the contractor has already carried out works, you must pay for them. And if the amount exceeds €12,000, you must provide him with a payment guarantee, even after termination. In Aubigny-sur-Nère, imagine you terminate a €20,000 contract after €8,000 worth of works: you must pay those €8,000 and provide a bank guarantee for the remaining balance.

For the contractor: this decision protects you. If your client terminates the contract without paying, you can apply to the interim relief judge for an interim payment. You do not have to wait for the dispute to be decided on the merits. This saves time and money.

For the subcontractor: you also benefit from this guarantee. The law provides that the subcontractor can demand the guarantee from the employer. If the main contractor is in default, you can go directly against the owner.

For the purchaser of a building: if you buy a property under construction, check that the seller has provided the payment guarantees to the contractors. Otherwise, you could inherit debts.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Demand the guarantee as soon as the contract is signed. Do not start the works without having received the bank guarantee or insurance assignment. In case of termination, you will be covered.
  • Make a precise inventory before any termination. Photograph the works carried out, have a bailiff's report made if necessary. This will allow you to prove the extent of the services in case of litigation.
  • Never unilaterally stop payment. If you think the work is poorly done, apply to the interim relief judge to have the defects noted, but do not stop paying. You could be ordered to pay an interim sum.
  • Consult a lawyer before terminating. Terminating a works contract has legal and financial consequences. A lawyer specialising in property law will help you assess the risks and negotiate an amicable solution.

This decision is part of a consistent line of the Court of Cassation. As early as 2013, the third civil chamber had ruled that the payment guarantee is due even after termination of the contract (Cass. civ. 3e, 11 December 2013, No. 12-27.579). The 2017 judgment confirms and clarifies this principle.

Another important decision is that of 10 September 2015 (No. 14-20.054) which extends this obligation to public works contracts, under certain conditions. The trend is therefore towards protecting contractors and subcontractors, by ensuring effective payment.

In the future, it is possible that the legislature will specify the terms of this guarantee, particularly the time limit for claiming it after termination. In the meantime, case law remains favourable to creditors of works.

Checklist before acting

FAQ: practical questions

  • Can I terminate a works contract without paying if the contractor has done poor work? No. You must first pay for the work done, then bring legal action to obtain damages. Termination does not exempt you from paying.
  • What is the minimum amount for the guarantee to be mandatory? €12,000 excluding VAT. Below that, the law does not require it, but you can provide for it contractually.
  • How can I claim the guarantee after termination? By registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt to the employer. If refused, apply to the interim relief judge.
  • What are the time limits for taking action? The interim relief judge rules urgently, usually within a few weeks. For an action on the merits, you have 5 years from the termination.
  • What if the employer is insolvent? The payment guarantee (bank guarantee) allows you to go against the bank. If it has not been provided, you can try to seize the employer's assets.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je résilier un contrat de travaux sans payer si l'entrepreneur a mal travaillé ?

Non, la résiliation ne vous dispense pas de payer les travaux déjà réalisés. Vous devez régler les sommes dues, puis engager une action en justice pour obtenir des dommages-intérêts si les travaux sont défectueux.

Quel est le montant minimum pour que la garantie de paiement soit obligatoire ?

Le seuil est fixé à 12 000 euros HT pour les marchés de travaux privés. En dessous, la loi n'impose pas de garantie, mais vous pouvez la prévoir contractuellement.

Comment obtenir la garantie de paiement après résiliation du marché ?

Vous devez envoyer une lettre recommandée avec accusé réception au maître d'ouvrage pour exiger la garantie. En cas de refus, saisissez le juge des référés qui pourra ordonner son versement sous astreinte.

Quels sont les délais pour agir en justice pour non-paiement des travaux ?

Pour une action en référé, quelques semaines. Pour une action au fond, vous avez 5 ans à compter de la résiliation du contrat ou de la fin des travaux.

Que faire si le maître d'ouvrage est insolvable ?

Si la garantie de paiement (caution bancaire) a été fournie, vous pouvez vous retourner contre la banque. Sinon, vous pouvez tenter de saisir les biens du maître d'ouvrage, mais les chances de recouvrement sont faibles.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 16-16.795
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 18 mai 2017

Mots-clés

garantie de paiementrésiliation de marchétravauxentrepreneurmaître d'ouvrage

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Owner who terminated a works contract in Saint-Amand-Montrond

Mr Durand, owner in Saint-Amand-Montrond, terminates his roof renovation contract after a dispute over quality. The contractor has already carried out €8,000 worth of work on a €18,000 contract.

Application pratique:

Mr Durand must pay the €8,000 and provide a bank guarantee for the balance of €10,000. He cannot refuse on the grounds of termination.

2

Contractor in Aubigny-sur-Nère faced with a client who does not pay after termination

A tradesman in Aubigny-sur-Nère has carried out €15,000 worth of work for a client who terminated the contract. The client refuses to pay, arguing that termination ends all obligations.

Application pratique:

The tradesman can apply to the interim relief judge for an interim payment of €15,000, because the obligation to pay is not seriously contestable.

3

Unpaid subcontractor after termination of the main contract

A plumbing subcontractor has carried out €6,000 worth of work under a €25,000 contract. The main contractor terminated the contract with the employer and does not pay the subcontractor.

Application pratique:

The subcontractor can claim the payment guarantee directly from the employer, even after termination. He must put the employer on formal notice then take interim relief proceedings.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide