Aller au contenu principal
Except in cases where review proceedings may be brought
Droit Immobilier

Except in cases where review proceedings may be brought

📅 Décision du 28 March 1995⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 vues📖 2 min de lecture

Except in cases where review proceedings may be brought, a judicial decision ordering a person to pay a debt under a contract precludes that person from challenging the binding force of that same contract by relying on new grounds of defence which they omitted to raise during the proceedings; consequently, the decision declaring inadmissible, on grounds of res judicata, the subsequent claim for annulment of that contract is legally justified (judgments nos. 1 and 2).

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 93-16.520 • 1995-03-28 • View decision →

This decision provides important clarification regarding property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Except in cases where review proceedings may be brought, a judicial decision ordering a person to pay a debt under a contract precludes that person from challenging the binding force of that same contract by relying on new grounds of defence which they omitted to raise during the proceedings; consequently, the decision declaring inadmissible, on grounds of res judicata, the subsequent claim for annulment of that contract is legally justified (judgments nos. 1 and 2).

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Comply strictly with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 93-16.520
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 28 mars 1995

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide